Natascha Stoffel, Michaël Mouthon, Andria Pelentritou, Laure von der Weid, Cristina Concetti, Marzia De Lucia, Selma Aybek
{"title":"Altered Interoceptive Predictive Coding in Functional Neurological Disorders.","authors":"Natascha Stoffel, Michaël Mouthon, Andria Pelentritou, Laure von der Weid, Cristina Concetti, Marzia De Lucia, Selma Aybek","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interoception, the processing of internal bodily signals, has been linked to the pathophysiology of Functional Neurological Disorder (FND), along with the theoretical concept of altered predictive coding (PC). FND symptoms such as sensory-motor dysfunction may arise from disrupted integration of sensory input and predictions. However, PC in the modality of interoception has not yet been investigated in FND. Using a PC paradigm, the cardio-audio synchronization task measured electrophysiological responses to the heartbeat during omitted sounds that were temporally locked to the heartbeat (synchronous condition) or not (asynchronous control condition). Patients with mixed FND symptoms (N = 36) were compared to sex- and age-matched healthy controls (HC: N = 42) by contrasting synchronous and asynchronous heartbeat-evoked potentials during omissions using cluster-based permutation statistics. We further tested associations with self-reported interoceptive variables and assessed whole-scalp main and interaction effects in global field power (GFP) and topography. Patients with FND showed no cluster-level differences between conditions, whereas we identified a central cluster difference in HCs. The interoceptive-specific contrast (synch-asynch difference waves) differed between groups and correlated with interoceptive self-report but only when tested across groups (r = -0.33, p = 0.012). In this paradigm, group-by-condition interactions in topography identified the insula as the most probable source of differences. These interactions occurred before those identified in GFP analyses, suggesting that differential networks emerge first, followed by changes in overall activity strength. These results indicate that patients with FND use different neural mechanisms for interoceptive PC (i.e., precision-weighted prediction errors in interoception-guided predictions) than HCs. Patients with FND showed no difference in interoceptive PC, suggesting a dysfunctional interoceptive system. Together, these findings suggest that interoceptive-cued regularity processing in FND is characterized by altered early network recruitment, followed by differences in overall signal strength, potentially reflecting a disrupted progression of interoceptive PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"63 10","pages":"e70417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13644901/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Interoception, the processing of internal bodily signals, has been linked to the pathophysiology of Functional Neurological Disorder (FND), along with the theoretical concept of altered predictive coding (PC). FND symptoms such as sensory-motor dysfunction may arise from disrupted integration of sensory input and predictions. However, PC in the modality of interoception has not yet been investigated in FND. Using a PC paradigm, the cardio-audio synchronization task measured electrophysiological responses to the heartbeat during omitted sounds that were temporally locked to the heartbeat (synchronous condition) or not (asynchronous control condition). Patients with mixed FND symptoms (N = 36) were compared to sex- and age-matched healthy controls (HC: N = 42) by contrasting synchronous and asynchronous heartbeat-evoked potentials during omissions using cluster-based permutation statistics. We further tested associations with self-reported interoceptive variables and assessed whole-scalp main and interaction effects in global field power (GFP) and topography. Patients with FND showed no cluster-level differences between conditions, whereas we identified a central cluster difference in HCs. The interoceptive-specific contrast (synch-asynch difference waves) differed between groups and correlated with interoceptive self-report but only when tested across groups (r = -0.33, p = 0.012). In this paradigm, group-by-condition interactions in topography identified the insula as the most probable source of differences. These interactions occurred before those identified in GFP analyses, suggesting that differential networks emerge first, followed by changes in overall activity strength. These results indicate that patients with FND use different neural mechanisms for interoceptive PC (i.e., precision-weighted prediction errors in interoception-guided predictions) than HCs. Patients with FND showed no difference in interoceptive PC, suggesting a dysfunctional interoceptive system. Together, these findings suggest that interoceptive-cued regularity processing in FND is characterized by altered early network recruitment, followed by differences in overall signal strength, potentially reflecting a disrupted progression of interoceptive PC.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.