Neural Repair Therapies After Stroke: I. Therapeutic Advances.

IF 11.1 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
David J Lin, Steven C Cramer
{"title":"Neural Repair Therapies After Stroke: I. Therapeutic Advances.","authors":"David J Lin, Steven C Cramer","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.126.056092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Neural repair therapies, distinct from acute stroke therapies, target surviving neural elements to promote plasticity after the acute injury has occurred. Repair therapies encompass a broad and rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, ranging from behavioral training, drugs, and biological agents to neural stimulation. In this review, we highlight major advances across these therapeutic categories, focusing on the evidence base and readiness for clinical adoption. Intensive behavioral interventions, including constraint-induced movement therapy and telerehabilitation, result in meaningful gains even in chronic stroke. Biological therapies-growth factors, monoclonal antibodies, and stem cell approaches-show promise but face translational challenges. Pharmacological strategies targeting serotonergic and dopaminergic systems have yielded mixed results. Neural stimulation approaches span a spectrum of invasiveness, with vagus nerve stimulation now Food and Drug Administration-approved and emerging candidates including cerebellar deep brain stimulation and spinal cord epidural stimulation showing early promise. These studies have provided important lessons for neural repair trial design. Synthesizing evidence across modalities, we highlight how therapeutic advances are reshaping the landscape of poststroke recovery and identify the most promising opportunities for clinical translation. Emerging neural repair strategies stand to substantially improve function after stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13651594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.126.056092","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Neural repair therapies, distinct from acute stroke therapies, target surviving neural elements to promote plasticity after the acute injury has occurred. Repair therapies encompass a broad and rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape, ranging from behavioral training, drugs, and biological agents to neural stimulation. In this review, we highlight major advances across these therapeutic categories, focusing on the evidence base and readiness for clinical adoption. Intensive behavioral interventions, including constraint-induced movement therapy and telerehabilitation, result in meaningful gains even in chronic stroke. Biological therapies-growth factors, monoclonal antibodies, and stem cell approaches-show promise but face translational challenges. Pharmacological strategies targeting serotonergic and dopaminergic systems have yielded mixed results. Neural stimulation approaches span a spectrum of invasiveness, with vagus nerve stimulation now Food and Drug Administration-approved and emerging candidates including cerebellar deep brain stimulation and spinal cord epidural stimulation showing early promise. These studies have provided important lessons for neural repair trial design. Synthesizing evidence across modalities, we highlight how therapeutic advances are reshaping the landscape of poststroke recovery and identify the most promising opportunities for clinical translation. Emerging neural repair strategies stand to substantially improve function after stroke.

脑卒中后神经修复治疗:1 .治疗进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书