Development and early implementation of a brief 2-day multidisciplinary parent training group for paediatric ARFID: A feasibility and acceptability study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Leila Carletti, Chloé Porte, Sarah Helbert, Marie Hooreman, Firiel Charpentier, Richard Delorme, Coline Stordeur, Thomas Villemonteix, Anaël Ayrolles
{"title":"Development and early implementation of a brief 2-day multidisciplinary parent training group for paediatric ARFID: A feasibility and acceptability study.","authors":"Leila Carletti, Chloé Porte, Sarah Helbert, Marie Hooreman, Firiel Charpentier, Richard Delorme, Coline Stordeur, Thomas Villemonteix, Anaël Ayrolles","doi":"10.1080/10640266.2026.2741121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many children with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) cannot access appropriate care, as existing individual and family treatments are scarce, long and costly. We developed a brief 2-day (12-h) multidisciplinary parent training group and assessed its feasibility and acceptability in routine care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Single-arm implementation study in one tertiary centre. Parents of 18 children (5-14 years) with DSM-5 ARFID (17/18 sensory-based; non-French-speaking families excluded) attended two days three weeks apart. Guided by the RE-AIM framework, we assessed reach, feasibility (a priori benchmark ≥75% completion) and acceptability (HAQ-11S; CSQ-8; parents' written feedback). Clinician-rated severity (CGI-S) was an exploratory, uncontrolled signal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 26 eligible families, 18 (69%) enrolled and 16 (89%) completed both days, exceeding the benchmark; attendance was almost exclusively maternal (83%). HAQ-11S and CSQ-8 scores were high and increased post-program (<i>p</i> < .001), and all respondents rated the satisfaction questionnaire positively. Parents' immediate self-reports most often cited better understanding of the disorder, increased competence and reduced isolation. CGI-S was numerically lower afterwards but this uncontrolled change cannot be attributed to the intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This brief multidisciplinary parent group for paediatric ARFID is feasible and highly acceptable in this specialist setting, resource use and clinical benefit require controlled evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48835,"journal":{"name":"Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2026.2741121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Many children with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) cannot access appropriate care, as existing individual and family treatments are scarce, long and costly. We developed a brief 2-day (12-h) multidisciplinary parent training group and assessed its feasibility and acceptability in routine care.

Method: Single-arm implementation study in one tertiary centre. Parents of 18 children (5-14 years) with DSM-5 ARFID (17/18 sensory-based; non-French-speaking families excluded) attended two days three weeks apart. Guided by the RE-AIM framework, we assessed reach, feasibility (a priori benchmark ≥75% completion) and acceptability (HAQ-11S; CSQ-8; parents' written feedback). Clinician-rated severity (CGI-S) was an exploratory, uncontrolled signal.

Results: Of 26 eligible families, 18 (69%) enrolled and 16 (89%) completed both days, exceeding the benchmark; attendance was almost exclusively maternal (83%). HAQ-11S and CSQ-8 scores were high and increased post-program (p < .001), and all respondents rated the satisfaction questionnaire positively. Parents' immediate self-reports most often cited better understanding of the disorder, increased competence and reduced isolation. CGI-S was numerically lower afterwards but this uncontrolled change cannot be attributed to the intervention.

Conclusion: This brief multidisciplinary parent group for paediatric ARFID is feasible and highly acceptable in this specialist setting, resource use and clinical benefit require controlled evaluation.

开发和早期实施儿科ARFID简短的2天多学科家长培训小组:可行性和可接受性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders PSYCHIATRY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Eating Disorders is contemporary and wide ranging, and takes a fundamentally practical, humanistic, compassionate view of clients and their presenting problems. You’ll find a multidisciplinary perspective on clinical issues and prevention research that considers the essential cultural, social, familial, and personal elements that not only foster eating-related problems, but also furnish clues that facilitate the most effective possible therapies and treatment approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书