Stage-specific quality of life and tolerability of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer: a narrative review.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Pub Date : 2026-10-07 DOI:10.1159/ocl/aebag020
Luca Scafuri, Carlo Buonerba, Vincenzo Marotta, Anna Rita Amato, Germano Guerra, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
{"title":"Stage-specific quality of life and tolerability of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer: a narrative review.","authors":"Luca Scafuri, Carlo Buonerba, Vincenzo Marotta, Anna Rita Amato, Germano Guerra, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo","doi":"10.1159/ocl/aebag020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor tolerability should be interpreted alongside treatment benefit, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and treatment continuation. This narrative review examines these outcomes in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic and early breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In MONALEESA-2, median overall survival (OS) was 63.9 versus 51.4 months with ribociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76), while global health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was maintained. PALOMA-2 and MONARCH 3 improved progression-free survival (HRs 0.58 and 0.540) without demonstrated OS improvement. Earlier CDK4/6 inhibitor use in SONIA increased exposure and toxicity without demonstrating improved OS or global HRQoL. In monarchE, with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone, seven-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was 77.4% versus 70.9% (HR 0.734), and OS was 86.8% versus 85.0% (HR 0.842). NATALEE showed a 4.5-percentage-point five-year iDFS difference; its OS estimate remained uncertain. Three-year mean global-health-status changes in NATALEE were -3.10 versus -1.96 points with ribociclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor versus the aromatase inhibitor alone. Grade ≥3 diarrhea occurred in 7.8% of abemaciclib-treated monarchE patients. PALLAS and PENELOPE-B did not demonstrate improved iDFS; 42.2% of PALLAS palbociclib initiators discontinued early, including 27.2% because of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>Global HRQoL, individual symptoms, and continuation answer different questions. Discussions about metastatic treatment should integrate disease control and sequencing; discussions about adjuvant treatment should address absolute recurrence reduction and planned duration. Both require consideration of baseline symptoms, uncertainty, and individual priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/ocl/aebag020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor tolerability should be interpreted alongside treatment benefit, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and treatment continuation. This narrative review examines these outcomes in hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic and early breast cancer.

Summary: In MONALEESA-2, median overall survival (OS) was 63.9 versus 51.4 months with ribociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.76), while global health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was maintained. PALOMA-2 and MONARCH 3 improved progression-free survival (HRs 0.58 and 0.540) without demonstrated OS improvement. Earlier CDK4/6 inhibitor use in SONIA increased exposure and toxicity without demonstrating improved OS or global HRQoL. In monarchE, with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone, seven-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) was 77.4% versus 70.9% (HR 0.734), and OS was 86.8% versus 85.0% (HR 0.842). NATALEE showed a 4.5-percentage-point five-year iDFS difference; its OS estimate remained uncertain. Three-year mean global-health-status changes in NATALEE were -3.10 versus -1.96 points with ribociclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor versus the aromatase inhibitor alone. Grade ≥3 diarrhea occurred in 7.8% of abemaciclib-treated monarchE patients. PALLAS and PENELOPE-B did not demonstrate improved iDFS; 42.2% of PALLAS palbociclib initiators discontinued early, including 27.2% because of adverse events.

Key messages: Global HRQoL, individual symptoms, and continuation answer different questions. Discussions about metastatic treatment should integrate disease control and sequencing; discussions about adjuvant treatment should address absolute recurrence reduction and planned duration. Both require consideration of baseline symptoms, uncertainty, and individual priorities.

CDK4/6抑制剂在hr阳性/ her2阴性乳腺癌中的分期特异性生活质量和耐受性:一项叙述性综述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书