Clinical Characteristics and Epidemiology of Isolated Dystonia: Results from a US Claims Analysis.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael S Oldham, Julie A Kerner, Bernard Ravina, Sonali Dasgupta, Joseph Imperato, James E Thornton
{"title":"Clinical Characteristics and Epidemiology of Isolated Dystonia: Results from a US Claims Analysis.","authors":"Michael S Oldham, Julie A Kerner, Bernard Ravina, Sonali Dasgupta, Joseph Imperato, James E Thornton","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.70856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dystonia is a rare, chronic movement disorder that is underrecognized, leading to delayed diagnosis. Epidemiological estimates and real-world characterization of isolated dystonia, occurring in the absence of other motor or neurological disorders, are limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Estimate the US incidence and prevalence of isolated dystonia and characterize adults with isolated dystonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study utilized a real-world claims database to identify an adult cohort (n = 20,951) with an index visit, defined as the first coded visit for dystonia, between January 2017-December 2024. Key outcomes included demographic and clinical characteristics of the adult cohort and US epidemiological estimates of dystonia without an identified secondary cause.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2020-2023 period prevalence was 50.2 per 100,000, corresponding to an overall prevalence of 168,151 individuals with isolated dystonia in the US in 2023. Annual incidence (2020-2023) ranged from 31.8 to 41.5 per 100,000. The largest age group was 18-44 years (45.1%). Most adults were female (68.4%). High rates of anxiety (23%) and depression (15%) were observed. Focal dystonia was the most coded subtype (73%), and primary care providers were most associated with the index visit (30%). Adults had a mean of 8.5 physician office visits pre-index, increasing to 13.5 post-index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study defines an isolated dystonia cohort in the US based on real-world evidence and systematic exclusion of secondary causes of dystonia. Estimated prevalence is within range of prior epidemiological studies, and the cohort showed increased rates of comorbid psychiatric disorders. Methods are needed to resolve inconsistencies between clinical classification and coding practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13647038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70856","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dystonia is a rare, chronic movement disorder that is underrecognized, leading to delayed diagnosis. Epidemiological estimates and real-world characterization of isolated dystonia, occurring in the absence of other motor or neurological disorders, are limited.

Objectives: Estimate the US incidence and prevalence of isolated dystonia and characterize adults with isolated dystonia.

Methods: The retrospective study utilized a real-world claims database to identify an adult cohort (n = 20,951) with an index visit, defined as the first coded visit for dystonia, between January 2017-December 2024. Key outcomes included demographic and clinical characteristics of the adult cohort and US epidemiological estimates of dystonia without an identified secondary cause.

Results: The 2020-2023 period prevalence was 50.2 per 100,000, corresponding to an overall prevalence of 168,151 individuals with isolated dystonia in the US in 2023. Annual incidence (2020-2023) ranged from 31.8 to 41.5 per 100,000. The largest age group was 18-44 years (45.1%). Most adults were female (68.4%). High rates of anxiety (23%) and depression (15%) were observed. Focal dystonia was the most coded subtype (73%), and primary care providers were most associated with the index visit (30%). Adults had a mean of 8.5 physician office visits pre-index, increasing to 13.5 post-index.

Conclusions: This study defines an isolated dystonia cohort in the US based on real-world evidence and systematic exclusion of secondary causes of dystonia. Estimated prevalence is within range of prior epidemiological studies, and the cohort showed increased rates of comorbid psychiatric disorders. Methods are needed to resolve inconsistencies between clinical classification and coding practices.

孤立性肌张力障碍的临床特征和流行病学:美国索赔分析的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书