Financial toxicity and its associated factors in patients requiring maintenance hemodialysis: a multicenter cross-sectional study in China.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Juanjuan Li, Dongling Feng, Jing Li, Li Li, Caixia Ma, Yuexia He
{"title":"Financial toxicity and its associated factors in patients requiring maintenance hemodialysis: a multicenter cross-sectional study in China.","authors":"Juanjuan Li, Dongling Feng, Jing Li, Li Li, Caixia Ma, Yuexia He","doi":"10.1093/joneph/aajag255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Financial toxicity is a growing concern for patients requiring Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD), affecting their quality of life and treatment adherence. In economically challenged areas like China's Ningxia Province, patients receiving MHD face increased financial burden due to high dialysis costs, transportation, and lost productivity. Identifying the prevalence and associated factors of financial toxicity is crucial for creating interventions to reduce its impact and improve outcomes of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter cross-sectional study in China involved 1,015 patients receiving MHD from four hospitals. Researchers evaluated financial toxicity, social support, and medical coping using COST-PROM, SSRS, and MCMQ scores. Data analysis was performed with Excel 2016 and SPSS 25.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study found a moderate average financial toxicity score of 19.21 ± 4.60. Among participants, 25.5% reported no financial toxicity, 28.4% had mild, and 46.1% experienced moderate financial toxicity. Significant factors related to financial toxicity included monthly household income, medical insurance type, dialysis vintage, number of comorbidities, social support, and coping styles of confrontation and surrender (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Financial toxicity is common among patients receiving MHD in Ningxia, China, linked to factors like low income, resident medical insurance, number of comorbidities, dialysis vintage, limited social support, and specific coping styles. This highlights the need for targeted interventions. Future studies could explore the value of early support for high-risk patients, regular financial toxicity screening, enhanced social networks, and personalized coping strategies might help alleviate this burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":16542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joneph/aajag255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Financial toxicity is a growing concern for patients requiring Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD), affecting their quality of life and treatment adherence. In economically challenged areas like China's Ningxia Province, patients receiving MHD face increased financial burden due to high dialysis costs, transportation, and lost productivity. Identifying the prevalence and associated factors of financial toxicity is crucial for creating interventions to reduce its impact and improve outcomes of patients.

Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study in China involved 1,015 patients receiving MHD from four hospitals. Researchers evaluated financial toxicity, social support, and medical coping using COST-PROM, SSRS, and MCMQ scores. Data analysis was performed with Excel 2016 and SPSS 25.0.

Results: The study found a moderate average financial toxicity score of 19.21 ± 4.60. Among participants, 25.5% reported no financial toxicity, 28.4% had mild, and 46.1% experienced moderate financial toxicity. Significant factors related to financial toxicity included monthly household income, medical insurance type, dialysis vintage, number of comorbidities, social support, and coping styles of confrontation and surrender (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Financial toxicity is common among patients receiving MHD in Ningxia, China, linked to factors like low income, resident medical insurance, number of comorbidities, dialysis vintage, limited social support, and specific coping styles. This highlights the need for targeted interventions. Future studies could explore the value of early support for high-risk patients, regular financial toxicity screening, enhanced social networks, and personalized coping strategies might help alleviate this burden.

维持性血液透析患者的财务毒性及其相关因素:中国一项多中心横断面研究
背景:财务毒性是维持性血液透析(MHD)患者日益关注的问题,影响他们的生活质量和治疗依从性。在中国宁夏等经济困难地区,由于透析费用高、交通不便和生产力下降,接受MHD治疗的患者面临越来越大的经济负担。确定财务毒性的患病率和相关因素对于制定干预措施以减少其影响和改善患者的预后至关重要。方法:在中国进行一项多中心横断面研究,涉及来自四家医院的1015例MHD患者。研究人员使用成本- prom、SSRS和MCMQ评分来评估财务毒性、社会支持和医疗应对。数据分析采用Excel 2016和SPSS 25.0软件。结果:中度金融毒性评分平均为19.21±4.60。在参与者中,25.5%的人报告没有金融毒性,28.4%的人报告轻度金融毒性,46.1%的人报告中度金融毒性。家庭月收入、医疗保险类型、透析年限、合并症数量、社会支持、对抗和投降应对方式是影响财务毒性的显著因素(p < 0.05)。结论:经济毒性在宁夏MHD患者中很常见,与低收入、居民医疗保险、合并症数量、透析时间、有限的社会支持和特定的应对方式等因素有关。这突出表明需要有针对性的干预措施。未来的研究可以探索对高危患者的早期支持的价值,定期的财务毒性筛查,增强的社会网络,以及个性化的应对策略可能有助于减轻这种负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nephrology
Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nephrology is a bimonthly journal that considers publication of peer reviewed original manuscripts dealing with both clinical and laboratory investigations of relevance to the broad fields of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. It is the Official Journal of the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书