Physician-level variation exceeds time-of-day variation in diagnostic resource utilization in low-acuity emergency department care.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mehmet Şirin Büyükkaya, Mesut Kina, Mahmut Şahin, Mehmet Tatli, Ramazan Sami Aktaş
{"title":"Physician-level variation exceeds time-of-day variation in diagnostic resource utilization in low-acuity emergency department care.","authors":"Mehmet Şirin Büyükkaya, Mesut Kina, Mahmut Şahin, Mehmet Tatli, Ramazan Sami Aktaş","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgag142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency physicians working prolonged shifts may show temporal variation in clinical practice. We examined whether diagnostic resource utilization differed across scheduled shift periods in a structured low-acuity emergency department setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 11 032 visits for upper respiratory tract infection, myalgia, abdominal pain, or headache across 12 nonconsecutive 24-hour shifts (5 December 2025-19 January 2026) in a high-volume tertiary emergency department in Turkey. Visits were classified as early (0-5 h; 08:30-13:30), mid (5-10 h; 13:30-18:30), or late (10-16 h; 18:30-00:30) based on elapsed time since the scheduled shift start at 08:30. Multivariable logistic regression with physician-level clustered standard errors (19 clusters) adjusted for age, sex, and diagnostic category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Laboratory testing rates were 9.5% across all periods (P = .997); imaging rates were 13.5%, 12.8%, and 12.6% (P = .485). The composite utilization score did not differ significantly (P = .682). Late-period consultation was lower than in the early period (odds ratio = 0.541, 95% confidence interval: 0.306-0.957), although this finding was limited by the low event count (n = 82). Inter-physician variation substantially exceeded shift-period variation, with laboratory rates ranging from 3.5% to 21.5% and imaging rates from 6.3% to 28.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this low-acuity emergency department setting, scheduled shift period was not measurably associated with increased laboratory or imaging utilization. Physician-level variation appeared more prominent than shift-period variation, supporting prospective studies incorporating fatigue, workload, and decision-quality measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgag142","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency physicians working prolonged shifts may show temporal variation in clinical practice. We examined whether diagnostic resource utilization differed across scheduled shift periods in a structured low-acuity emergency department setting.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 11 032 visits for upper respiratory tract infection, myalgia, abdominal pain, or headache across 12 nonconsecutive 24-hour shifts (5 December 2025-19 January 2026) in a high-volume tertiary emergency department in Turkey. Visits were classified as early (0-5 h; 08:30-13:30), mid (5-10 h; 13:30-18:30), or late (10-16 h; 18:30-00:30) based on elapsed time since the scheduled shift start at 08:30. Multivariable logistic regression with physician-level clustered standard errors (19 clusters) adjusted for age, sex, and diagnostic category.

Results: Laboratory testing rates were 9.5% across all periods (P = .997); imaging rates were 13.5%, 12.8%, and 12.6% (P = .485). The composite utilization score did not differ significantly (P = .682). Late-period consultation was lower than in the early period (odds ratio = 0.541, 95% confidence interval: 0.306-0.957), although this finding was limited by the low event count (n = 82). Inter-physician variation substantially exceeded shift-period variation, with laboratory rates ranging from 3.5% to 21.5% and imaging rates from 6.3% to 28.7%.

Conclusion: In this low-acuity emergency department setting, scheduled shift period was not measurably associated with increased laboratory or imaging utilization. Physician-level variation appeared more prominent than shift-period variation, supporting prospective studies incorporating fatigue, workload, and decision-quality measures.

在低度急诊科护理中,医生水平的变化超过了诊断资源利用的时间变化。
背景:急诊医生长时间轮班工作可能在临床实践中表现出时间差异。我们研究了在一个结构化的低敏锐度急诊科设置中,诊断资源的利用是否在安排的轮班期间有所不同。方法:这项回顾性观察性研究纳入了土耳其一家大容量三级急诊科12个非连续24小时轮班(2025年12月5日至2026年1月19日)的11032例上呼吸道感染、肌痛、腹痛或头痛患者。根据从08:30开始排班的时间,就诊分为早(0-5小时;08:30-13:30)、中(5-10小时;13:30-18:30)或晚(10-16小时;18:30-00:30)。多变量逻辑回归与医生水平聚类标准误差(19个聚类)调整年龄、性别和诊断类别。结果:各时期实验室检出率为9.5% (P = .997);显像率分别为13.5%、12.8%和12.6% (P = .485)。综合利用评分差异无统计学意义(P = .682)。晚期咨询低于早期(优势比= 0.541,95%可信区间:0.306-0.957),尽管这一发现受到低事件计数的限制(n = 82)。医生之间的差异大大超过了轮班期间的差异,实验室率从3.5%到21.5%不等,影像学率从6.3%到28.7%不等。结论:在这个低视力的急诊科设置中,计划的轮班时间与实验室或成像利用率的增加没有明显的联系。医生水平的变化比轮班期的变化更为突出,支持纳入疲劳、工作量和决策质量措施的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Postgraduate Medical Journal
Postgraduate Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书