Deep learning-based prediction of one-year functional and structural outcomes in treatment-naïve DMO after anti-VEGF therapy.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Eye Pub Date : 2026-10-07 DOI:10.1038/s41433-026-04898-z
Lorena Ulla, Jonathan D Oakley, Riccardo Fasana, Daniel B Russakoff, Giovanni Neri, Michele Reibaldi, Enrico Borrelli
{"title":"Deep learning-based prediction of one-year functional and structural outcomes in treatment-naïve DMO after anti-VEGF therapy.","authors":"Lorena Ulla, Jonathan D Oakley, Riccardo Fasana, Daniel B Russakoff, Giovanni Neri, Michele Reibaldi, Enrico Borrelli","doi":"10.1038/s41433-026-04898-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether baseline structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans contain prognostic information that can be used by deep learning models to predict one-year functional and anatomical outcomes in treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema (DMO).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighty-seven eyes (74 patients) with treatment-naïve DMO receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Baseline OCT volumes were analysed using a deep learning regression model. The images were homogenised - preprocessed and transformed into a common reference frame - to streamline the learning task. The model predicted 12-month changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Performance was assessed using 5-fold cross-validation and compared between original and preprocessed datasets. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated classification of responders versus non-responders, while occlusion sensitivity analysis identified image regions contributing most to predictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean BCVA improved from 0.40 ± 0.40 to 0.33 ± 0.30 logMAR, and CST decreased from 390.2 ± 77.1 µm to 342.2 ± 76.3 µm (both p < 0.001). Prediction of BCVA change achieved an R² of 0.575, improving to 0.661 after preprocessing. CST prediction improved from R² = 0.447-0.633. Classification performance increased from AUC 0.65 to 0.71 for BCVA response and from 0.93 to 0.97 for CST response. Key predictive regions included the outer retina and retinal pigment epithelium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep learning analysis of baseline OCT can predict one-year outcomes in DMO. Image homogenisation enhances performance, and responder identification suggests the potential utility of this approach for prognostic assessment and risk stratification, warranting further validation before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12125,"journal":{"name":"Eye","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-026-04898-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether baseline structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans contain prognostic information that can be used by deep learning models to predict one-year functional and anatomical outcomes in treatment-naïve diabetic macular oedema (DMO).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Participants: Eighty-seven eyes (74 patients) with treatment-naïve DMO receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy.

Methods: Baseline OCT volumes were analysed using a deep learning regression model. The images were homogenised - preprocessed and transformed into a common reference frame - to streamline the learning task. The model predicted 12-month changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST).

Main outcome measures: Performance was assessed using 5-fold cross-validation and compared between original and preprocessed datasets. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated classification of responders versus non-responders, while occlusion sensitivity analysis identified image regions contributing most to predictions.

Results: Mean BCVA improved from 0.40 ± 0.40 to 0.33 ± 0.30 logMAR, and CST decreased from 390.2 ± 77.1 µm to 342.2 ± 76.3 µm (both p < 0.001). Prediction of BCVA change achieved an R² of 0.575, improving to 0.661 after preprocessing. CST prediction improved from R² = 0.447-0.633. Classification performance increased from AUC 0.65 to 0.71 for BCVA response and from 0.93 to 0.97 for CST response. Key predictive regions included the outer retina and retinal pigment epithelium.

Conclusions: Deep learning analysis of baseline OCT can predict one-year outcomes in DMO. Image homogenisation enhances performance, and responder identification suggests the potential utility of this approach for prognostic assessment and risk stratification, warranting further validation before clinical implementation.

基于深度学习的抗vegf治疗后treatment-naïve DMO一年功能和结构结局预测。
目的:评估基线结构光学相干断层扫描(OCT)扫描是否包含可用于深度学习模型预测treatment-naïve糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DMO)一年功能和解剖结果的预后信息。设计:回顾性队列研究。参与者:87只眼(74名患者)treatment-naïve DMO接受玻璃体内抗vegf治疗。方法:使用深度学习回归模型分析基线OCT体积。这些图像经过均质化——预处理并转换成一个共同的参考框架——以简化学习任务。该模型预测了12个月最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中心子野厚度(CST)的变化。主要结果测量:使用5倍交叉验证评估性能,并在原始数据集和预处理数据集之间进行比较。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估了应答者与无应答者的分类,而闭塞敏感性分析确定了对预测贡献最大的图像区域。结果:平均BCVA从0.40±0.40 logMAR改善到0.33±0.30 logMAR, CST从390.2±77.1µm下降到342.2±76.3µm(均为p)结论:基线OCT的深度学习分析可以预测DMO的一年预后。图像均匀化提高了性能,应答者识别表明这种方法在预后评估和风险分层方面的潜在效用,在临床实施之前需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eye
Eye 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
481
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye seeks to provide the international practising ophthalmologist with high quality articles, of academic rigour, on the latest global clinical and laboratory based research. Its core aim is to advance the science and practice of ophthalmology with the latest clinical- and scientific-based research. Whilst principally aimed at the practising clinician, the journal contains material of interest to a wider readership including optometrists, orthoptists, other health care professionals and research workers in all aspects of the field of visual science worldwide. Eye is the official journal of The Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Eye encourages the submission of original articles covering all aspects of ophthalmology including: external eye disease; oculo-plastic surgery; orbital and lacrimal disease; ocular surface and corneal disorders; paediatric ophthalmology and strabismus; glaucoma; medical and surgical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; cataract and refractive surgery; ocular oncology; ophthalmic pathology; ophthalmic genetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书