Are a Dilated Cecum and Small Bowel Distention on CT Imaging Associated with Worse Postoperative Outcomes in Left-Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer? A Population-Based Study.

IF 1.2 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Bas A J Kertzman, Femke J Amelung, Esther C J Consten, Pieter J Tanis, Werner A Draaisma
{"title":"Are a Dilated Cecum and Small Bowel Distention on CT Imaging Associated with Worse Postoperative Outcomes in Left-Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer? A Population-Based Study.","authors":"Bas A J Kertzman, Femke J Amelung, Esther C J Consten, Pieter J Tanis, Werner A Draaisma","doi":"10.1159/dsu/acoag008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a dilated cecum (≥9 cm) and small-bowel distention on preoperative CT are associated with worse postoperative outcomes in patients with left-sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC) undergoing an emergency resection (ER) or a bridge-to-surgery (BTS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national multicenter cohort study was conducted using data from a prospective audit performed in 75 Dutch hospitals. Patients undergoing curative resection for LSOCC (2009-2016) with available CT data on cecal diameter and small-bowel distention were included. Primary outcomes were 90-day postoperative complications and mortality, analyzed by multivariable logistic regression and stratified by treatment strategy (ER vs. BTS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,282 patients, 967 underwent ER and 315 BTS. Among ER patients, concurrent cecal dilatation (≥9 cm) and small-bowel distention were independently associated with higher 90-day complications (58.8% vs. 42.7%; OR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.25-2.93; p = 0.003) and 30-day mortality (7.0% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.038). These associations were absent in BTS patients. In this high-risk CT subgroup, BTS yielded fewer complications (37.4% vs. 58.8%), lower permanent stoma rates (23.0% vs. 52.1%), and higher primary anastomosis rates (85.4% vs. 30.6%). In young (<70 years) and healthy patients (ASA I-II) without a dilated coecum or small bowel on CT, no outcome differences were found between ER and BTS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concurrent cecal dilatation and small-bowel distention on CT identify high-risk patients after ER, whereas BTS mitigates these risks. Routine CT-assessment may aid individualized management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/dsu/acoag008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a dilated cecum (≥9 cm) and small-bowel distention on preoperative CT are associated with worse postoperative outcomes in patients with left-sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC) undergoing an emergency resection (ER) or a bridge-to-surgery (BTS).

Methods: A national multicenter cohort study was conducted using data from a prospective audit performed in 75 Dutch hospitals. Patients undergoing curative resection for LSOCC (2009-2016) with available CT data on cecal diameter and small-bowel distention were included. Primary outcomes were 90-day postoperative complications and mortality, analyzed by multivariable logistic regression and stratified by treatment strategy (ER vs. BTS).

Results: Of 1,282 patients, 967 underwent ER and 315 BTS. Among ER patients, concurrent cecal dilatation (≥9 cm) and small-bowel distention were independently associated with higher 90-day complications (58.8% vs. 42.7%; OR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.25-2.93; p = 0.003) and 30-day mortality (7.0% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.038). These associations were absent in BTS patients. In this high-risk CT subgroup, BTS yielded fewer complications (37.4% vs. 58.8%), lower permanent stoma rates (23.0% vs. 52.1%), and higher primary anastomosis rates (85.4% vs. 30.6%). In young (<70 years) and healthy patients (ASA I-II) without a dilated coecum or small bowel on CT, no outcome differences were found between ER and BTS.

Conclusion: Concurrent cecal dilatation and small-bowel distention on CT identify high-risk patients after ER, whereas BTS mitigates these risks. Routine CT-assessment may aid individualized management.

左侧梗阻性结肠癌术后CT影像上盲肠扩张和小肠膨胀是否与较差的预后相关?一项基于人群的研究。
目的评估左侧梗阻性结肠癌(LSOCC)患者行急诊切除术(ER)或手术桥(BTS)时,术前CT显示盲肠扩张(≥9cm)和小肠膨胀是否与较差的术后预后相关。方法采用荷兰75家医院的前瞻性审计数据,开展了一项全国性多中心队列研究。接受根治性切除术的LSOCC患者(2009-2016),有盲肠直径和小肠膨胀的CT数据。主要结局是术后90天的并发症和死亡率,通过多变量logistic回归分析并按治疗策略(ER vs BTS)分层。结果1282例患者中,ER治疗967例,BTS治疗315例。在急诊患者中,并发盲肠扩张(≥9 cm)和小肠膨胀与较高的90天并发症(58.8% vs 42.7%; OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.25-2.93; p= 0.003)和30天死亡率(7.0% vs 2.7%; p= 0.038)独立相关。这些关联在BTS患者中不存在。在这一高危CT亚组中,BTS并发症较少(37.4% vs 58.8%),永久造口率较低(23.0% vs 52.1%),一期吻合率较高(85.4% vs 30.6%)。在年轻时(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Digestive Surgery
Digestive Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Digestive Surgery'' presents a comprehensive overview in the field of gastrointestinal surgery. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal keeps the specialist aware of advances in all fields that contribute to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Particular emphasis is given to articles that evaluate not only recent clinical developments, especially clinical trials and technical innovations such as new endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures, but also relevant translational research. Each contribution is carefully aligned with the need of the digestive surgeon. Thus, the journal is an important component of the continuing medical education of surgeons who want their practice to benefit from a familiarity with new knowledge in all its dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书