Seeing and Being Seen: Argive–Corinthian Mirror Biographies and Visual Translation in the Pontic Steppe

IF 0.5 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arts Pub Date : 2026-09-23 DOI:10.3390/arts15100219
Denis Topal, Lavinia Grumeza
{"title":"Seeing and Being Seen: Argive–Corinthian Mirror Biographies and Visual Translation in the Pontic Steppe","authors":"Denis Topal, Lavinia Grumeza","doi":"10.3390/arts15100219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines a corpus of so-called “Argive–Corinthian” bronze mirrors from the northern and western Black Sea region, exploring their circulation, use, and reinterpretation within Scythian, Thracian, and related non-Greek societies during the late sixth to fourth centuries BC. Rather than treating these mirrors as mere Greek luxury imports or markers of Hellenisation, the study examines how they acquired new meanings after entering local funerary and social contexts. The analysis combines typological study, archaeological context, chronology, distribution, and iconography to reconstruct these objects’ biographies. A catalogue of securely documented mirrors reveals consistent patterns in their geographical distribution, with Olbia emerging as the principal intermediary through which these prestige goods entered the Pontic hinterland. Most examples derive from richly furnished female burials, where they occur alongside jewellery, imported pottery, horse equipment, pigments, spindle whorls, and other high-status objects, indicating their role in elite representation and ritual performance. Particular attention is paid to mirrors decorated with gorgoneia, sphinxes, and frontal female figures. These motifs are interpreted not as fixed carriers of Greek mythological meaning but as visual forms whose significance was reshaped in local cultural settings. Evidence for repair and prolonged use, especially at Mereni and Mamay–Hora, demonstrates that many mirrors remained valued for generations, functioning as curated possessions or heirlooms whose biographies extended well beyond their original production. This article argues that these mirrors should be understood as active participants in processes of cultural translation rather than passive indicators of exchange. Their movement across the Black Sea frontier involved not the straightforward transfer of Greek meanings, but their selective reinterpretation within local systems of status, gender, ritual practice, and social memory. By tracing the circulation, reuse, and deposition of these objects, this study contributes to broader discussions of intercultural interaction, object biographies, and the role of material culture in mediating relationships between Greek colonial centres and the societies of the Pontic steppe.","PeriodicalId":30547,"journal":{"name":"Arts","volume":"9 1","pages":"219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/arts15100219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines a corpus of so-called “Argive–Corinthian” bronze mirrors from the northern and western Black Sea region, exploring their circulation, use, and reinterpretation within Scythian, Thracian, and related non-Greek societies during the late sixth to fourth centuries BC. Rather than treating these mirrors as mere Greek luxury imports or markers of Hellenisation, the study examines how they acquired new meanings after entering local funerary and social contexts. The analysis combines typological study, archaeological context, chronology, distribution, and iconography to reconstruct these objects’ biographies. A catalogue of securely documented mirrors reveals consistent patterns in their geographical distribution, with Olbia emerging as the principal intermediary through which these prestige goods entered the Pontic hinterland. Most examples derive from richly furnished female burials, where they occur alongside jewellery, imported pottery, horse equipment, pigments, spindle whorls, and other high-status objects, indicating their role in elite representation and ritual performance. Particular attention is paid to mirrors decorated with gorgoneia, sphinxes, and frontal female figures. These motifs are interpreted not as fixed carriers of Greek mythological meaning but as visual forms whose significance was reshaped in local cultural settings. Evidence for repair and prolonged use, especially at Mereni and Mamay–Hora, demonstrates that many mirrors remained valued for generations, functioning as curated possessions or heirlooms whose biographies extended well beyond their original production. This article argues that these mirrors should be understood as active participants in processes of cultural translation rather than passive indicators of exchange. Their movement across the Black Sea frontier involved not the straightforward transfer of Greek meanings, but their selective reinterpretation within local systems of status, gender, ritual practice, and social memory. By tracing the circulation, reuse, and deposition of these objects, this study contributes to broader discussions of intercultural interaction, object biographies, and the role of material culture in mediating relationships between Greek colonial centres and the societies of the Pontic steppe.
看见与被看见:阿尔奇-科林斯式的镜像传记与本蒂克草原的视觉翻译
本文研究了来自黑海北部和西部地区的所谓“阿尔吉夫-科林斯”铜镜,探索了公元前6世纪晚期至4世纪期间,在斯基泰、色雷斯和相关的非希腊社会中,它们的流通、使用和重新解释。该研究并没有将这些镜子仅仅视为希腊的奢侈品进口或希腊化的标志,而是研究了它们在进入当地的葬礼和社会背景后如何获得新的含义。该分析结合了类型学研究、考古背景、年代学、分布和图像学来重建这些物体的传记。一份安全记录的镜子目录揭示了它们在地理分布上的一致模式,奥尔比亚成为这些贵重物品进入本蒂克腹地的主要中介。大多数例子来自装饰华丽的女性墓葬,在那里它们与珠宝、进口陶器、马匹装备、颜料、纺锤轮和其他高地位物品一起出现,表明它们在精英代表和仪式表演中的作用。特别值得注意的是装饰有柳橙花、狮身人面像和正面女性形象的镜子。这些主题不是被解释为希腊神话意义的固定载体,而是作为视觉形式,其意义在当地文化环境中被重塑。修复和长期使用的证据,特别是在Mereni和Mamay-Hora,表明许多镜子在几代人之后仍然很有价值,作为精心收藏的财产或传家宝,其传记远远超出了它们最初的制作。本文认为,这些镜子应该被理解为文化翻译过程的积极参与者,而不是被动的交流指标。他们穿越黑海边境的运动并没有直接转移希腊语的含义,而是在当地的地位、性别、仪式实践和社会记忆体系中有选择地重新诠释。通过追踪这些物品的流通、再利用和沉积,本研究有助于更广泛地讨论文化间的互动、物品传记,以及物质文化在希腊殖民中心和本蒂克草原社会之间的调解关系中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts
Arts HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
40.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书