The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Ethics: Lessons from Wolff

IF 2.1 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
MIND Pub Date : 2026-09-16 DOI:10.1093/mind/fzag043
Joe Stratmann
{"title":"The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Ethics: Lessons from Wolff","authors":"Joe Stratmann","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzag043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The principle of sufficient reason (PSR) implies that everything has a sufficient reason. Yet its role in ethics has gone undertheorized. A stark historical exception is found in Christian Wolff, the most influential German philosopher between Leibniz and Kant. I argue that the PSR has indispensable non-normative and normative uses in ethics for Wolff—uses without which ethics would not be possible at all. In sketching these uses, I highlight how Wolff aspires to skirt two Humean challenges. The first concerns how the PSR, which concerns what is, can imply anything about what ought to be. The second concerns how the reasons established through the PSR can be morally motivating. Although hardly unproblematic or uncontroversial, Wolff’s discussion of the PSR in ethics offers both a welcome exception to centuries of undertheorizing and a potential challenge to opponents of the PSR.","PeriodicalId":48124,"journal":{"name":"MIND","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzag043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The principle of sufficient reason (PSR) implies that everything has a sufficient reason. Yet its role in ethics has gone undertheorized. A stark historical exception is found in Christian Wolff, the most influential German philosopher between Leibniz and Kant. I argue that the PSR has indispensable non-normative and normative uses in ethics for Wolff—uses without which ethics would not be possible at all. In sketching these uses, I highlight how Wolff aspires to skirt two Humean challenges. The first concerns how the PSR, which concerns what is, can imply anything about what ought to be. The second concerns how the reasons established through the PSR can be morally motivating. Although hardly unproblematic or uncontroversial, Wolff’s discussion of the PSR in ethics offers both a welcome exception to centuries of undertheorizing and a potential challenge to opponents of the PSR.
伦理学中的充分理性原则:来自沃尔夫的教训
摘要充分理由原则是指任何事物都有充分理由。然而,它在伦理学中的作用还没有理论化。历史上一个明显的例外是克里斯蒂安·沃尔夫,他是介于莱布尼茨和康德之间最有影响力的德国哲学家。我认为,对于沃尔夫来说,PSR在伦理学中有不可缺少的非规范性和规范性用途——没有这些用途,伦理学根本就不可能存在。在概述这些用途时,我强调沃尔夫是如何渴望避开休谟的两个挑战的。第一个问题是,关注现状的PSR如何暗示应该是什么。第二个问题是,通过PSR建立的理由如何能够在道德上激励。尽管沃尔夫对伦理学中PSR的讨论并非毫无问题或没有争议,但它既为几个世纪以来理论化不足的理论提供了一个受欢迎的例外,也给PSR的反对者带来了潜在的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MIND
MIND PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Mind has long been a leading journal in philosophy. For well over 100 years it has presented the best of cutting edge thought from epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of logic, and philosophy of mind. Mind continues its tradition of excellence today. Mind has always enjoyed a strong reputation for the high standards established by its editors and receives around 350 submissions each year. The editor seeks advice from a large number of expert referees, including members of the network of Associate Editors and his international advisers. Mind is published quarterly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书