{"title":"The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Ethics: Lessons from Wolff","authors":"Joe Stratmann","doi":"10.1093/mind/fzag043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The principle of sufficient reason (PSR) implies that everything has a sufficient reason. Yet its role in ethics has gone undertheorized. A stark historical exception is found in Christian Wolff, the most influential German philosopher between Leibniz and Kant. I argue that the PSR has indispensable non-normative and normative uses in ethics for Wolff—uses without which ethics would not be possible at all. In sketching these uses, I highlight how Wolff aspires to skirt two Humean challenges. The first concerns how the PSR, which concerns what is, can imply anything about what ought to be. The second concerns how the reasons established through the PSR can be morally motivating. Although hardly unproblematic or uncontroversial, Wolff’s discussion of the PSR in ethics offers both a welcome exception to centuries of undertheorizing and a potential challenge to opponents of the PSR.","PeriodicalId":48124,"journal":{"name":"MIND","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MIND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzag043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The principle of sufficient reason (PSR) implies that everything has a sufficient reason. Yet its role in ethics has gone undertheorized. A stark historical exception is found in Christian Wolff, the most influential German philosopher between Leibniz and Kant. I argue that the PSR has indispensable non-normative and normative uses in ethics for Wolff—uses without which ethics would not be possible at all. In sketching these uses, I highlight how Wolff aspires to skirt two Humean challenges. The first concerns how the PSR, which concerns what is, can imply anything about what ought to be. The second concerns how the reasons established through the PSR can be morally motivating. Although hardly unproblematic or uncontroversial, Wolff’s discussion of the PSR in ethics offers both a welcome exception to centuries of undertheorizing and a potential challenge to opponents of the PSR.
期刊介绍:
Mind has long been a leading journal in philosophy. For well over 100 years it has presented the best of cutting edge thought from epistemology, metaphysics, philosophy of language, philosophy of logic, and philosophy of mind. Mind continues its tradition of excellence today. Mind has always enjoyed a strong reputation for the high standards established by its editors and receives around 350 submissions each year. The editor seeks advice from a large number of expert referees, including members of the network of Associate Editors and his international advisers. Mind is published quarterly.