Financial Market Effectiveness of Sustainability Initiatives in Green Bond Markets: Evidence Synthesis and Research Framework

IF 13.2 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Fabian Leonardo Romeo, Florian Follert, Matthias Spörrle
{"title":"Financial Market Effectiveness of Sustainability Initiatives in Green Bond Markets: Evidence Synthesis and Research Framework","authors":"Fabian Leonardo Romeo, Florian Follert, Matthias Spörrle","doi":"10.1002/bse.71596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research synthesizes prior evidence on the effectiveness of financial market sustainability initiatives (FMSIs) in green bond markets. Our analysis of 45 peer‐reviewed studies, including 42 quantitative empirical studies with 169 codable FMSI–outcome relationships, shows that FMSIs are most consistently associated with favorable financial market outcomes when they improve credibility, comparability, or interpretability of green bond information. Pricing evidence differs between primary and secondary markets. Across both segments, greenness assurance provides the broadest pricing evidence base, whereas regulation and policy show the most favorable evidence balance on a narrower base. Outside pricing, evidence remains limited for issuer behavior, relative green allocation, and environmental attribution. We propose a life cycle–based research framework linking information and agency problems to five stages of the green bond process and identify future research directions concerning FMSI interactions, institutional conditions, and participation costs. Our findings provide design implications for issuers, investors, regulators, and information intermediaries.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71596","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research synthesizes prior evidence on the effectiveness of financial market sustainability initiatives (FMSIs) in green bond markets. Our analysis of 45 peer‐reviewed studies, including 42 quantitative empirical studies with 169 codable FMSI–outcome relationships, shows that FMSIs are most consistently associated with favorable financial market outcomes when they improve credibility, comparability, or interpretability of green bond information. Pricing evidence differs between primary and secondary markets. Across both segments, greenness assurance provides the broadest pricing evidence base, whereas regulation and policy show the most favorable evidence balance on a narrower base. Outside pricing, evidence remains limited for issuer behavior, relative green allocation, and environmental attribution. We propose a life cycle–based research framework linking information and agency problems to five stages of the green bond process and identify future research directions concerning FMSI interactions, institutional conditions, and participation costs. Our findings provide design implications for issuers, investors, regulators, and information intermediaries.
绿色债券市场可持续性举措的金融市场有效性:证据综合与研究框架
本研究综合了金融市场可持续性举措(fmsi)在绿色债券市场有效性的先前证据。我们对45项同行评议研究(包括42项具有169个可编码fmsi结果关系的定量实证研究)的分析表明,当fmsi提高绿色债券信息的可信度、可比性或可解释性时,它们与有利的金融市场结果的关系最为一致。一级市场和二级市场的定价证据不同。在这两个部分中,绿色保证提供了最广泛的定价证据基础,而监管和政策在较窄的基础上显示了最有利的证据平衡。在定价之外,关于发行人行为、相对绿色配置和环境归因的证据仍然有限。我们提出了一个基于生命周期的研究框架,将信息和代理问题与绿色债券过程的五个阶段联系起来,并确定了未来关于FMSI相互作用、制度条件和参与成本的研究方向。我们的研究结果为发行人、投资者、监管机构和信息中介机构提供了设计启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书