Gender Diversity, Sustainable Investment, and Corporate Environmental Performance: A Systematic Review of Investor‐Level and Firm‐Level ESG Mechanisms

IF 13.2 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Jaypee Sumaljag Yongco
{"title":"Gender Diversity, Sustainable Investment, and Corporate Environmental Performance: A Systematic Review of Investor‐Level and Firm‐Level ESG Mechanisms","authors":"Jaypee Sumaljag Yongco","doi":"10.1002/bse.71598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing has grown substantially over the past decade, yet the gender dimensions of this transformation remain fragmented across two largely siloed research streams. This systematic literature review applies the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 protocol to synthesize empirical evidence on (a) gender differences in individual investor ESG preferences and (b) the influence of board gender diversity on firm level ESG performance. A search of Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified 895 records published between 2015 and first quarter 2026, of which 88 studies met inclusion criteria. Findings reveal that women investors exhibit stronger prosocial investment preferences mediated by ethical sensitivity, social role internalization, and lower tolerance for ESG controversies. At the firm level, board gender diversity correlates positively with ESG disclosure quality and environmental performance, with effects strengthening above the critical mass threshold of three or more women directors. Quasi‐experimental evidence from European board gender quotas suggests causal spillovers from board composition to environmental and social outcomes, although near‐term firm valuation effects remain contested. Convergence between the demand‐side and supply‐side channels is most evident at the disclosure margin and weakest at the financial returns margin. Methodological tensions involve ESG rating divergence, endogeneity of board selection, and underrepresentation of emerging market evidence from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region. The review contributes a dual‐channel conceptual framework integrating demand and supply mechanisms, identifies seven priority directions for future research, and offers practical implications for asset managers, board nomination committees, and regulators implementing the European Union Women on Boards Directive 2022/2381.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71598","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing has grown substantially over the past decade, yet the gender dimensions of this transformation remain fragmented across two largely siloed research streams. This systematic literature review applies the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 protocol to synthesize empirical evidence on (a) gender differences in individual investor ESG preferences and (b) the influence of board gender diversity on firm level ESG performance. A search of Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified 895 records published between 2015 and first quarter 2026, of which 88 studies met inclusion criteria. Findings reveal that women investors exhibit stronger prosocial investment preferences mediated by ethical sensitivity, social role internalization, and lower tolerance for ESG controversies. At the firm level, board gender diversity correlates positively with ESG disclosure quality and environmental performance, with effects strengthening above the critical mass threshold of three or more women directors. Quasi‐experimental evidence from European board gender quotas suggests causal spillovers from board composition to environmental and social outcomes, although near‐term firm valuation effects remain contested. Convergence between the demand‐side and supply‐side channels is most evident at the disclosure margin and weakest at the financial returns margin. Methodological tensions involve ESG rating divergence, endogeneity of board selection, and underrepresentation of emerging market evidence from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region. The review contributes a dual‐channel conceptual framework integrating demand and supply mechanisms, identifies seven priority directions for future research, and offers practical implications for asset managers, board nomination committees, and regulators implementing the European Union Women on Boards Directive 2022/2381.
性别多样性、可持续投资和企业环境绩效:投资者层面和公司层面ESG机制的系统回顾
在过去十年中,环境、社会和治理(ESG)投资大幅增长,但这一转型的性别维度仍然分散在两个基本上孤立的研究流中。本系统文献综述采用了系统评估和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA) 2020协议,以综合以下方面的经验证据:(a)个人投资者ESG偏好的性别差异和(b)董事会性别多样性对公司层面ESG绩效的影响。通过对Scopus、Web of Science和谷歌Scholar的搜索,我们发现了2015年至2026年第一季度发表的895篇论文,其中88篇论文符合纳入标准。研究发现,女性投资者表现出更强的亲社会投资偏好,其中介因素包括伦理敏感性、社会角色内化和对ESG争议的较低容忍度。在公司层面,董事会性别多样性与ESG披露质量和环境绩效呈正相关,超过三名或更多女性董事的临界质量阈值后,这种效应会增强。来自欧洲董事会性别配额的准实验证据表明,董事会构成对环境和社会结果的因果溢出效应,尽管近期公司估值效应仍存在争议。需求侧和供给侧渠道之间的趋同在披露边际上最为明显,在财务回报边际上最弱。方法论上的紧张关系包括ESG评级分歧、董事会选择的内生性,以及来自东南亚国家联盟(ASEAN)地区的新兴市场证据代表性不足。该综述提供了一个整合需求和供应机制的双渠道概念框架,确定了未来研究的七个优先方向,并为资产管理公司、董事会提名委员会和实施欧盟董事会女性指令2022/2381的监管机构提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书