Does native culture restore emotional intensity? Distinct effects of cultural context on L2 affective processing

IF 2.4 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Yanxi Lu, Kate Cain, Bo Yao, Francesca Citron
{"title":"Does native culture restore emotional intensity? Distinct effects of cultural context on L2 affective processing","authors":"Yanxi Lu, Kate Cain, Bo Yao, Francesca Citron","doi":"10.1017/s1366728926101771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bilinguals often experience reduced emotional resonance in their second language (L2), known as “emotional distance.” This study investigates how cultural context, specifically culture relatedness, modulates this experience in late Mandarin-English bilinguals. We employed a multi-methodological approach to disentangle implicit and explicit processing. Study 1 (Implicit Association Test) revealed no automatic bias linking culture to emotion, suggesting that long-term L2 immersion may equilibrate implicit associations. Study 2 (explicit ratings), however, found a significant interaction: priming native (Chinese) culture led participants to evaluate negative L2 words as more negative, whereas the L2 (British) cultural context attenuated these evaluations, reinforcing emotional distance. Positive words remained unaffected. These findings demonstrate that culture is an active modulator of bilingual emotion. While acculturation may balance implicit links, conscious activation of native cultural schemas can bridge L2 emotional distance for aversive content, whereas L2 contexts serve to buffer emotional intensity.","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"25 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728926101771","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bilinguals often experience reduced emotional resonance in their second language (L2), known as “emotional distance.” This study investigates how cultural context, specifically culture relatedness, modulates this experience in late Mandarin-English bilinguals. We employed a multi-methodological approach to disentangle implicit and explicit processing. Study 1 (Implicit Association Test) revealed no automatic bias linking culture to emotion, suggesting that long-term L2 immersion may equilibrate implicit associations. Study 2 (explicit ratings), however, found a significant interaction: priming native (Chinese) culture led participants to evaluate negative L2 words as more negative, whereas the L2 (British) cultural context attenuated these evaluations, reinforcing emotional distance. Positive words remained unaffected. These findings demonstrate that culture is an active modulator of bilingual emotion. While acculturation may balance implicit links, conscious activation of native cultural schemas can bridge L2 emotional distance for aversive content, whereas L2 contexts serve to buffer emotional intensity.
本土文化能恢复情感强度吗?文化语境对二语情感加工的显著影响
双语者在第二语言(L2)中的情感共鸣通常会减少,这被称为“情感距离”。本研究探讨了文化背景,特别是文化相关性,如何调节晚期中英双语者的这种体验。我们采用了一种多方法的方法来理清内隐处理和外显处理。研究1(内隐联想测试)显示,文化与情绪之间没有自动的关联偏差,这表明长期的二语沉浸可以平衡内隐联想。然而,研究2(显性评价)发现了显著的相互作用:启动本土(中国)文化导致参与者将消极的二语词汇评价为更消极,而二语(英国)文化背景减弱了这些评价,加强了情感距离。积极的话语没有受到影响。这些发现表明,文化是双语情感的积极调节因素。虽然文化适应可以平衡内隐联系,但有意识地激活本土文化图式可以弥合二语厌恶内容的情感距离,而二语语境则可以缓冲情感强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书