Matías Landino, Lucas Gheco, Eugenia Ahets Etcheberry, Marcos Tascon, Fernando Marte
{"title":"Grinding Charcoal for Rock Painting: A Methodological Framework for Particle-Size Analysis in Rock Art Micro-Samples","authors":"Matías Landino, Lucas Gheco, Eugenia Ahets Etcheberry, Marcos Tascon, Fernando Marte","doi":"10.1007/s10816-026-09834-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on the materiality of rock art has shifted attention from images as finished products to the technical and social processes involved in their making. Within this framework, pigment grinding is a crucial but still methodologically elusive aspect of painting production, despite its potential to inform technological choices, labor investment, and variability in painting practices. In this paper, we propose an experimental and archaeometric approach to the study of charcoal grinding in rock art micro-samples. By combining experimental archaeology, optical microscopy, and particle analysis, we develop a model linking charcoal particle area to grinding time. We apply this method to study black rock paintings from the Oyola archaeological site, in northwestern Argentina, where charcoal was identified as the main black pigment. The results show that microscopically measurable differences in particle areas make it possible to distinguish varying degrees of grinding among paintings that are macroscopically and chemically similar. Beyond the local case study, our findings demonstrate that pigment granulometry can provide access to otherwise invisible dimensions of rock art production, complementing the existing knowledge of technical variability, painting events, and the historical processes through which painted surfaces were made and transformed.","PeriodicalId":47725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-026-09834-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research on the materiality of rock art has shifted attention from images as finished products to the technical and social processes involved in their making. Within this framework, pigment grinding is a crucial but still methodologically elusive aspect of painting production, despite its potential to inform technological choices, labor investment, and variability in painting practices. In this paper, we propose an experimental and archaeometric approach to the study of charcoal grinding in rock art micro-samples. By combining experimental archaeology, optical microscopy, and particle analysis, we develop a model linking charcoal particle area to grinding time. We apply this method to study black rock paintings from the Oyola archaeological site, in northwestern Argentina, where charcoal was identified as the main black pigment. The results show that microscopically measurable differences in particle areas make it possible to distinguish varying degrees of grinding among paintings that are macroscopically and chemically similar. Beyond the local case study, our findings demonstrate that pigment granulometry can provide access to otherwise invisible dimensions of rock art production, complementing the existing knowledge of technical variability, painting events, and the historical processes through which painted surfaces were made and transformed.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, the leading journal in its field, presents original articles that address method- or theory-focused issues of current archaeological interest and represent significant explorations on the cutting edge of the discipline. The journal also welcomes topical syntheses that critically assess and integrate research on a specific subject in archaeological method or theory, as well as examinations of the history of archaeology. Written by experts, the articles benefit an international audience of archaeologists, students of archaeology, and practitioners of closely related disciplines. Specific topics covered in recent issues include: the use of nitche construction theory in archaeology, new developments in the use of soil chemistry in archaeological interpretation, and a model for the prehistoric development of clothing. The Journal''s distinguished Editorial Board includes archaeologists with worldwide archaeological knowledge (the Americas, Asia and the Pacific, Europe, and Africa), and expertise in a wide range of methodological and theoretical issues. Rated ''A'' in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH) Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory is rated ''A'' in the ERIH, a new reference index that aims to help evenly access the scientific quality of Humanities research output. For more information visit: http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/activities/research-infrastructures.html Rated ''A'' in the Australian Research Council Humanities and Creative Arts Journal List. For more information, visit: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/journal_list_dev.htm