Geopolitical risk and firms’ eco-innovation: International evidence

Muhammad Saleem, Searat Ali, Abdullah Al-Mumun, David Tan
{"title":"Geopolitical risk and firms’ eco-innovation: International evidence","authors":"Muhammad Saleem, Searat Ali, Abdullah Al-Mumun, David Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2026.101978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geopolitical risk (GPR) has emerged as one of the most significant sources of uncertainty facing firms in the modern global economy, yet its impact on corporate environmental strategy remains poorly understood. This study explores the impact of GPR on firm eco-innovation using data from 42 countries from 2002 to 2022. Results show that heightened GPR is negatively and significantly associated with firm eco-innovation through mechanisms such as reduced green R&D investment and heightened cash flow volatility. These findings remain robust across alternative eco-innovation and GPR measures, and advanced econometric techniques, including propensity score matching, and entropy balancing. Further, we find that firm characteristics such as board independence and gender diversity, as well as country-level factors including sustainable development and eco-innovation, significantly mitigate the adverse impact of GPR on firm eco-innovation. We also find that the impact of GPR on firms’ eco-innovation varies across industries and is more pronounced among internationally exposed firms. By highlighting these dynamics, the findings contribute to a better understanding of how firms can sustain environmental initiatives amid geopolitical uncertainty, offering insights for policymakers and corporate managers in fostering resilience and sustainability.","PeriodicalId":501001,"journal":{"name":"The British Accounting Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"101978"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2026.101978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geopolitical risk (GPR) has emerged as one of the most significant sources of uncertainty facing firms in the modern global economy, yet its impact on corporate environmental strategy remains poorly understood. This study explores the impact of GPR on firm eco-innovation using data from 42 countries from 2002 to 2022. Results show that heightened GPR is negatively and significantly associated with firm eco-innovation through mechanisms such as reduced green R&D investment and heightened cash flow volatility. These findings remain robust across alternative eco-innovation and GPR measures, and advanced econometric techniques, including propensity score matching, and entropy balancing. Further, we find that firm characteristics such as board independence and gender diversity, as well as country-level factors including sustainable development and eco-innovation, significantly mitigate the adverse impact of GPR on firm eco-innovation. We also find that the impact of GPR on firms’ eco-innovation varies across industries and is more pronounced among internationally exposed firms. By highlighting these dynamics, the findings contribute to a better understanding of how firms can sustain environmental initiatives amid geopolitical uncertainty, offering insights for policymakers and corporate managers in fostering resilience and sustainability.
地缘政治风险与企业生态创新:国际证据
地缘政治风险(GPR)已成为现代全球经济中企业面临的最重要的不确定性来源之一,但其对企业环境战略的影响仍然知之甚少。本文利用2002年至2022年42个国家的数据,探讨了GPR对企业生态创新的影响。结果表明,GPR的提高与企业生态创新之间存在显著负相关关系,其机制包括绿色研发投资的减少和现金流波动的增加。这些发现在替代生态创新和GPR措施以及先进的计量经济学技术(包括倾向得分匹配和熵平衡)中仍然有效。此外,我们发现董事会独立性和性别多样性等企业特征,以及可持续发展和生态创新等国家层面因素显著缓解了GPR对企业生态创新的不利影响。我们还发现,GPR对企业生态创新的影响因行业而异,在国际化企业中更为明显。通过强调这些动态,研究结果有助于更好地理解企业如何在地缘政治不确定性的情况下维持环境举措,为政策制定者和企业管理者提供增强弹性和可持续性的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书