Techno-economic and environmental assessment of biomass-to-sustainable aviation fuel production via gasification coupled with a Fischer-Tropsch process

IF 12.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Chunyu Liu, Yuwen Shao, Hongbin Wan, Jiaqi Jiao, Guanyi Chen, Beibei Yan, Zhanjun Cheng, Weiming Yi, Sunu Herwi Pranolo, Obie Farobie, Jingang Yao
{"title":"Techno-economic and environmental assessment of biomass-to-sustainable aviation fuel production via gasification coupled with a Fischer-Tropsch process","authors":"Chunyu Liu, Yuwen Shao, Hongbin Wan, Jiaqi Jiao, Guanyi Chen, Beibei Yan, Zhanjun Cheng, Weiming Yi, Sunu Herwi Pranolo, Obie Farobie, Jingang Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.cej.2026.182699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is widely recognized as one of the most promising pathways for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation sector. This work presents an integrated modeling framework for SAF production from dual fluidized bed (DFB) biomass gasification and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis. By combining process simulation, energy analysis and techno-economic evaluation within a unified platform, the proposed framework enables a comprehensive assessment of technical, environmental and economic performance. At 100.0 kg/h biomass, 800 °C and S/B = 0.8, the process produces 15.0 kg/h SAF. The exported liquid-product energy ratio is 35.1%, while useful-energy utilization reaches 41.8% when internal gas recycling and DFB heat transfer are included. Within the defined foreground gate-to-gate boundary, the SAF-specific global warming potential (GWP) and acidification potential (AP) were 31.06 g CO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf>-eq/kg SAF and 2.64 × 10<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−3</ce:sup> g SO<ce:inf loc=\"post\">2</ce:inf>-eq/kg SAF, respectively, after LHV-based energy allocation. The screening-level techno-economic assessment gives a total capital investment of approximately 4.8 × 10<ce:sup loc=\"post\">6</ce:sup> USD and an SAF production cost of 6.7 USD/kg, indicating limited economic competitiveness under the present conceptual small-scale design basis. Overall, the work develops an integrated framework for biomass-to-SAF assessment, enabling systematic identification of thermodynamic, environmental and economic bottlenecks to support process optimization.","PeriodicalId":270,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Engineering Journal","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2026.182699","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is widely recognized as one of the most promising pathways for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from the aviation sector. This work presents an integrated modeling framework for SAF production from dual fluidized bed (DFB) biomass gasification and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis. By combining process simulation, energy analysis and techno-economic evaluation within a unified platform, the proposed framework enables a comprehensive assessment of technical, environmental and economic performance. At 100.0 kg/h biomass, 800 °C and S/B = 0.8, the process produces 15.0 kg/h SAF. The exported liquid-product energy ratio is 35.1%, while useful-energy utilization reaches 41.8% when internal gas recycling and DFB heat transfer are included. Within the defined foreground gate-to-gate boundary, the SAF-specific global warming potential (GWP) and acidification potential (AP) were 31.06 g CO2-eq/kg SAF and 2.64 × 10−3 g SO2-eq/kg SAF, respectively, after LHV-based energy allocation. The screening-level techno-economic assessment gives a total capital investment of approximately 4.8 × 106 USD and an SAF production cost of 6.7 USD/kg, indicating limited economic competitiveness under the present conceptual small-scale design basis. Overall, the work develops an integrated framework for biomass-to-SAF assessment, enabling systematic identification of thermodynamic, environmental and economic bottlenecks to support process optimization.
通过气化结合费托工艺生产生物质到可持续航空燃料的技术经济和环境评估
可持续航空燃料(SAF)被广泛认为是减少航空业温室气体排放的最有前途的途径之一。这项工作提出了一个集成的建模框架,用于双流化床(DFB)生物质气化和费托合成(FT)的SAF生产。通过将过程模拟、能源分析和技术经济评估结合在一个统一的平台上,提出的框架能够对技术、环境和经济绩效进行综合评估。在100.0 kg/h生物质,800°C和S/B = 0.8时,该工艺产生15.0 kg/h SAF。出口液产能比为35.1%,含内气循环和DFB换热的有效能利用率为41.8%。在确定的前景门到门边界内,基于lhv的能量分配后,sav特有的全球变暖势(GWP)和酸化势(AP)分别为31.06 g CO2-eq/kg SAF和2.64 × 10−3 g SO2-eq/kg SAF。经筛选级技术经济评价,总投资约为4.8 × 106美元,SAF生产成本为6.7美元/公斤,在目前的概念小量设计基础上,经济竞争力有限。总的来说,这项工作开发了一个综合框架,用于生物质到saf的评估,能够系统地识别热力学、环境和经济瓶颈,以支持过程优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chemical Engineering Journal
Chemical Engineering Journal 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
6781
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Chemical Engineering Journal is an international research journal that invites contributions of original and novel fundamental research. It aims to provide an international platform for presenting original fundamental research, interpretative reviews, and discussions on new developments in chemical engineering. The journal welcomes papers that describe novel theory and its practical application, as well as those that demonstrate the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. It also welcomes reports on carefully conducted experimental work that is soundly interpreted. The main focus of the journal is on original and rigorous research results that have broad significance. The Catalysis section within the Chemical Engineering Journal focuses specifically on Experimental and Theoretical studies in the fields of heterogeneous catalysis, molecular catalysis, and biocatalysis. These studies have industrial impact on various sectors such as chemicals, energy, materials, foods, healthcare, and environmental protection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书