Confronting housing and health inequities: Wanted—critical transdisciplinary inquiry

IF 4.4 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Roderick J. Lawrence
{"title":"Confronting housing and health inequities: Wanted—critical transdisciplinary inquiry","authors":"Roderick J. Lawrence","doi":"10.1177/00420980261487090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This critical commentary requests creative, critical, and inclusive dialogue about the persistence of inequitable housing and health inequalities. It complements numerous publications in housing and urban studies about environmental, ethnic, socio-economic, and residential inequalities in an era of growing neoliberal politics and policies that influence housing and health inequities. The main aim is to propose conceptual and methodological reforms in housing and urban studies. I posit that critical transdisciplinary inquiry enables innovative contributions to bridge the gap between persistent housing and health inequities and ineffective responses to them. Critical transdisciplinary inquiry includes ethical and moral values that acknowledge and confront housing and health inequities worldwide. The common actor/institutional framework used by academic researchers in housing and urban studies that devalues dominant power imbalances of private investors and property owners in housing markets is contested; the authority of local and national governing institutions to support alternative approaches is revalued. Given the ineffectiveness of private enterprises and public authorities in reducing housing and health inequities since the 1980s, community consortia should be supported to mainstream cooperative housing and expand their effective responses. Lessons from 19th-century housing and urban history, and coordinated responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, support this way forward.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980261487090","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This critical commentary requests creative, critical, and inclusive dialogue about the persistence of inequitable housing and health inequalities. It complements numerous publications in housing and urban studies about environmental, ethnic, socio-economic, and residential inequalities in an era of growing neoliberal politics and policies that influence housing and health inequities. The main aim is to propose conceptual and methodological reforms in housing and urban studies. I posit that critical transdisciplinary inquiry enables innovative contributions to bridge the gap between persistent housing and health inequities and ineffective responses to them. Critical transdisciplinary inquiry includes ethical and moral values that acknowledge and confront housing and health inequities worldwide. The common actor/institutional framework used by academic researchers in housing and urban studies that devalues dominant power imbalances of private investors and property owners in housing markets is contested; the authority of local and national governing institutions to support alternative approaches is revalued. Given the ineffectiveness of private enterprises and public authorities in reducing housing and health inequities since the 1980s, community consortia should be supported to mainstream cooperative housing and expand their effective responses. Lessons from 19th-century housing and urban history, and coordinated responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, support this way forward.
面对住房和卫生不平等:需要关键的跨学科调查
这一批评性评论要求就不公平的住房和保健不平等现象的持续存在进行创造性、批判性和包容性的对话。它补充了许多关于环境、种族、社会经济和住房不平等的住房和城市研究方面的出版物,这些研究涉及影响住房和健康不平等的新自由主义政治和政策日益增长的时代。主要目的是提出住房和城市研究的概念和方法改革。我认为,关键的跨学科调查能够作出创新贡献,弥合持续存在的住房和卫生不平等现象与对这些不平等现象的无效反应之间的差距。关键的跨学科调查包括承认和面对世界各地的住房和卫生不平等的伦理和道德价值观。学术研究人员在住房和城市研究中使用的共同行为者/制度框架贬低了私人投资者和房地产所有者在住房市场中的主导权力失衡,这一框架受到质疑;重新评价地方和国家管理机构支持替代办法的权威。鉴于私营企业和公共当局自1980年代以来在减少住房和保健不平等方面的无能为力,应支持社区财团将合作住房纳入主流,并扩大其有效对策。19世纪住房和城市历史的教训,以及对COVID-19大流行的协调应对,都支持这一前进道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书