Social bilingual language use is associated with neural efficiency in inhibitory control: Evidence from ERPs

IF 2.4 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Megan Nakamura, Sergio Miguel Pereira-Soares, Allison Roggen, Michele T. Diaz, Eleonora Rossi
{"title":"Social bilingual language use is associated with neural efficiency in inhibitory control: Evidence from ERPs","authors":"Megan Nakamura, Sergio Miguel Pereira-Soares, Allison Roggen, Michele T. Diaz, Eleonora Rossi","doi":"10.1017/s136672892610176x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive control supports flexible goal maintenance and conflict resolution. Although bilingual experience has been proposed to enhance its efficiency through sustained language control, emerging evidence suggests these effects reflect adaptive recalibration driven by individual language use rather than domain-general transfer. Here we examined how individual differences in bilingual experience modulate behavioral and neural indices of adaptive attentional control during conflict processing, as indexed by an adaptive Flanker task. Fifty participants (M = 19.6 years) completed the Language and Social Background Questionnaire and an electroencephalography adaptive Flanker task. Event-related potentials in the N100, N200 and P300 windows indexed attentional allocation, conflict detection, and monitoring. Behaviorally, participants showed the expected Flanker interference effect, with no modulation by bilingual experience. In contrast, greater Non-English Social Use, but not overall bilingualism or home use, was associated with attenuated N100s and N200s, suggesting reduced early attentional demands. These neural effects, in the absence of behavioral differences, suggest experience-dependent efficiency in control recruitment rather than enhanced control.","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s136672892610176x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive control supports flexible goal maintenance and conflict resolution. Although bilingual experience has been proposed to enhance its efficiency through sustained language control, emerging evidence suggests these effects reflect adaptive recalibration driven by individual language use rather than domain-general transfer. Here we examined how individual differences in bilingual experience modulate behavioral and neural indices of adaptive attentional control during conflict processing, as indexed by an adaptive Flanker task. Fifty participants (M = 19.6 years) completed the Language and Social Background Questionnaire and an electroencephalography adaptive Flanker task. Event-related potentials in the N100, N200 and P300 windows indexed attentional allocation, conflict detection, and monitoring. Behaviorally, participants showed the expected Flanker interference effect, with no modulation by bilingual experience. In contrast, greater Non-English Social Use, but not overall bilingualism or home use, was associated with attenuated N100s and N200s, suggesting reduced early attentional demands. These neural effects, in the absence of behavioral differences, suggest experience-dependent efficiency in control recruitment rather than enhanced control.
社会双语语言的使用与抑制控制的神经效率有关:来自erp的证据
认知控制支持灵活的目标维护和冲突解决。虽然双语经验已被提出通过持续的语言控制来提高其效率,但新出现的证据表明,这些影响反映了个体语言使用驱动的适应性再校准,而不是领域一般迁移。本研究考察了双语经验的个体差异如何调节冲突处理过程中自适应注意控制的行为和神经指标。50名参与者(M = 19.6岁)完成了语言和社会背景问卷和脑电图适应性侧卫任务。N100、N200和P300窗口中的事件相关电位与注意力分配、冲突检测和监测有关。在行为上,参与者表现出预期的侧卫干扰效应,不受双语经验的调节。相比之下,更大的非英语社交使用,而不是整体双语或家庭使用,与n100和n200的减弱有关,这表明早期注意需求减少。在没有行为差异的情况下,这些神经效应表明,控制招募的效率依赖于经验,而不是增强控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书