Integration of Oral Health Into Primary Care and Public Health Systems: A Systematic Review of Strategies, Outcomes, and Sustainability Determinants.

IF 1.5
Abhi Thakkar, Bharani Kumar Bhattu, Chintan Desai, Deepkumar Patel, Abhishek Gupta, Harender Singh
{"title":"Integration of Oral Health Into Primary Care and Public Health Systems: A Systematic Review of Strategies, Outcomes, and Sustainability Determinants.","authors":"Abhi Thakkar, Bharani Kumar Bhattu, Chintan Desai, Deepkumar Patel, Abhishek Gupta, Harender Singh","doi":"10.1111/jphd.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of integrated oral health services within primary care and other health system settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted. Studies evaluating the integration of oral health services into primary care or related settings were eligible, including comparative and implementation studies of preventive interventions, screening, counseling, fluoride varnish delivery, referral pathways, and integrated care models. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed using design-appropriate tools. Where outcomes were sufficiently comparable, random-effects meta-analysis was performed, with pooled estimates reported as risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HR), or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomized trials, cohort studies, implementation evaluations, qualitative studies, and economic analyses. Integrated preventive oral health interventions were associated with reduced caries incidence (pooled RR/HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.09-0.43; two studies) and lower caries burden in children (pooled SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.36; two studies). Several studies also reported improved delivery of preventive oral health services in primary care. Heterogeneity in study designs and outcome reporting limited quantitative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integration of preventive oral health services into primary care appears feasible and may improve oral health outcomes and service delivery. However, heterogeneity and the small number of studies contributing to pooled estimates limit confidence in the findings. Further well-designed controlled studies using standardized outcome measures are needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD420251239041.</p>","PeriodicalId":94108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jphd.70086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of integrated oral health services within primary care and other health system settings.

Methods: A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted. Studies evaluating the integration of oral health services into primary care or related settings were eligible, including comparative and implementation studies of preventive interventions, screening, counseling, fluoride varnish delivery, referral pathways, and integrated care models. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed using design-appropriate tools. Where outcomes were sufficiently comparable, random-effects meta-analysis was performed, with pooled estimates reported as risk ratios (RR), hazard ratios (HR), or standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomized trials, cohort studies, implementation evaluations, qualitative studies, and economic analyses. Integrated preventive oral health interventions were associated with reduced caries incidence (pooled RR/HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.09-0.43; two studies) and lower caries burden in children (pooled SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.36; two studies). Several studies also reported improved delivery of preventive oral health services in primary care. Heterogeneity in study designs and outcome reporting limited quantitative synthesis.

Conclusions: Integration of preventive oral health services into primary care appears feasible and may improve oral health outcomes and service delivery. However, heterogeneity and the small number of studies contributing to pooled estimates limit confidence in the findings. Further well-designed controlled studies using standardized outcome measures are needed.

Trial registration: PROSPERO: CRD420251239041.

将口腔健康纳入初级保健和公共卫生系统:对策略、结果和可持续性决定因素的系统回顾。
目的:评估初级保健和其他卫生系统环境中综合口腔卫生服务的有效性和实施情况。方法:对电子数据库进行系统综述。评估口腔卫生服务融入初级保健或相关环境的研究是合格的,包括预防性干预、筛查、咨询、氟化物清漆递送、转诊途径和综合护理模式的比较和实施研究。使用设计合适的工具评估偏倚风险和方法学质量。如果结果具有足够的可比性,则进行随机效应荟萃分析,合并估计报告为风险比(RR)、危险比(HR)或95%置信区间(CI)的标准化平均差异(SMD)。结果:27项研究符合纳入标准,包括随机试验、队列研究、实施评估、定性研究和经济分析。综合预防性口腔健康干预与降低儿童龋齿发生率(综合RR/HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.09-0.43;两项研究)和降低儿童龋齿负担相关(综合SMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.54 -0.36;两项研究)。几项研究还报告说,初级保健中预防性口腔保健服务的提供有所改善。研究设计和结果报告的异质性限制了定量综合。结论:将预防性口腔保健服务纳入初级保健似乎是可行的,并可能改善口腔健康结果和服务提供。然而,异质性和汇总估计的研究数量较少限制了研究结果的可信度。需要进一步设计良好的对照研究,使用标准化的结果测量方法。试验注册:PROSPERO: CRD420251239041。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书