Exploring cheminformatics tools to combat prostate cancer: diagnostics, therapeutics, and mechanistic studies.

In silico pharmacology Pub Date : 2026-10-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s40203-026-00762-w
Samuel Igwe, Cyril Osereme Ehi-Eromosele, Inemesit Asukwo Udofia, Oluwakemi Adekunbi Oloba-Whenu
{"title":"Exploring cheminformatics tools to combat prostate cancer: diagnostics, therapeutics, and mechanistic studies.","authors":"Samuel Igwe, Cyril Osereme Ehi-Eromosele, Inemesit Asukwo Udofia, Oluwakemi Adekunbi Oloba-Whenu","doi":"10.1007/s40203-026-00762-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite recent progress, prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most prevalent forms of cancer in men worldwide, and a variety of challenges remain to prevent timely detection, biomarker specificity, and the development of treatment resistance due to tumor heterogeneity and changes in androgen receptor (AR) signaling. For PCa diagnosis, treatment, and mechanistic research, cheminformatics and bioinformatics tools like virtual screening, molecular docking, pharmacophore modeling, and QSAR modeling, computational drug repurposing, molecular dynamics simulation, network pharmacology, multi-omics profiling, and MRI/radiomics are viewed as an interconnected continuum, with AI/ML/DL as a common analytical layer. To distinguish between clinically useful diagnostic methods and discovery-stage computational methods, a comparative evaluation methodology is presented that assesses each method according to several criteria: clinical maturity, predictive value, validation requirements, and clinical translatability. In addition to MRI, the only clinically validated modality described, other virtual screening, docking, QSAR, and network pharmacology techniques are predominantly used for discovery and preclinical applications and must be further validated through experimental and prospective clinical studies before becoming translatable to clinical use. Although multi-omics and network pharmacology methods are used to gain mechanistic insights into resistance pathways, cheminformatics-based strategies have helped identify candidate compounds and repurpose drugs targeting AR- and CRPC-related targets. Aside from diagnostic classification, AI/ML/DL applications currently being developed involve multimodal integration, biomarker discovery, and patient stratification, yet to be adopted in clinical practice, there is a need for explainable AI and multi-cohort prospective validation. An integrated computational pathway from discovery to experimental and clinical validation is suggested to facilitate future translational efforts. These computational tools together show great promise for improving the precision of PCa management, but require proper, sequential experimental and clinical evaluation of their in-silico predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94038,"journal":{"name":"In silico pharmacology","volume":"14 3","pages":"254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13635076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In silico pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40203-026-00762-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite recent progress, prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most prevalent forms of cancer in men worldwide, and a variety of challenges remain to prevent timely detection, biomarker specificity, and the development of treatment resistance due to tumor heterogeneity and changes in androgen receptor (AR) signaling. For PCa diagnosis, treatment, and mechanistic research, cheminformatics and bioinformatics tools like virtual screening, molecular docking, pharmacophore modeling, and QSAR modeling, computational drug repurposing, molecular dynamics simulation, network pharmacology, multi-omics profiling, and MRI/radiomics are viewed as an interconnected continuum, with AI/ML/DL as a common analytical layer. To distinguish between clinically useful diagnostic methods and discovery-stage computational methods, a comparative evaluation methodology is presented that assesses each method according to several criteria: clinical maturity, predictive value, validation requirements, and clinical translatability. In addition to MRI, the only clinically validated modality described, other virtual screening, docking, QSAR, and network pharmacology techniques are predominantly used for discovery and preclinical applications and must be further validated through experimental and prospective clinical studies before becoming translatable to clinical use. Although multi-omics and network pharmacology methods are used to gain mechanistic insights into resistance pathways, cheminformatics-based strategies have helped identify candidate compounds and repurpose drugs targeting AR- and CRPC-related targets. Aside from diagnostic classification, AI/ML/DL applications currently being developed involve multimodal integration, biomarker discovery, and patient stratification, yet to be adopted in clinical practice, there is a need for explainable AI and multi-cohort prospective validation. An integrated computational pathway from discovery to experimental and clinical validation is suggested to facilitate future translational efforts. These computational tools together show great promise for improving the precision of PCa management, but require proper, sequential experimental and clinical evaluation of their in-silico predictions.

探索化学信息学工具对抗前列腺癌:诊断、治疗和机制研究。
尽管最近取得了进展,但前列腺癌(PCa)仍然是全球男性中最常见的癌症之一,由于肿瘤异质性和雄激素受体(AR)信号的变化,各种挑战仍然存在,无法及时检测,生物标志物特异性和治疗耐药性的发展。对于PCa的诊断、治疗和机制研究,化学信息学和生物信息学工具,如虚拟筛选、分子对接、药效团建模和QSAR建模、计算药物重新利用、分子动力学模拟、网络药理学、多组学分析和MRI/放射组学,被视为一个相互关联的连续体,而AI/ML/DL是一个共同的分析层。为了区分临床有用的诊断方法和发现阶段的计算方法,提出了一种比较评估方法,根据几个标准评估每种方法:临床成熟度、预测价值、验证要求和临床可翻译性。除了MRI(唯一被临床验证的模式)之外,其他虚拟筛选、对接、QSAR和网络药理学技术主要用于发现和临床前应用,必须通过实验和前瞻性临床研究进一步验证才能转化为临床应用。虽然多组学和网络药理学方法用于获得耐药性途径的机制见解,但基于化学信息学的策略有助于确定候选化合物和靶向AR和crpc相关靶点的药物。除了诊断分类,目前正在开发的AI/ML/DL应用还涉及多模式整合、生物标志物发现和患者分层,但尚未在临床实践中采用,因此需要可解释的AI和多队列前瞻性验证。建议从发现到实验和临床验证的综合计算途径,以促进未来的转化工作。这些计算工具一起显示了提高前列腺癌管理精度的巨大希望,但需要适当的,顺序的实验和临床评估他们的计算机预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书