Evaluating the Cytotoxicity of Commercial Materials for Additive Manufacturing of Soft Tissues

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Amal Shabazz, Julia Fitlin, Henry Orozco-Contreras, Cassandra Nti, William Pieper Holeman, Stephen Farias, John P. Fisher
{"title":"Evaluating the Cytotoxicity of Commercial Materials for Additive Manufacturing of Soft Tissues","authors":"Amal Shabazz,&nbsp;Julia Fitlin,&nbsp;Henry Orozco-Contreras,&nbsp;Cassandra Nti,&nbsp;William Pieper Holeman,&nbsp;Stephen Farias,&nbsp;John P. Fisher","doi":"10.1002/jbm.a.70169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapid growth of additive manufacturing technologies continues to drive the commercial development of standardized materials to streamline the process. Despite the growing range of available materials, few still achieve a balance between flexibility and biocompatibility. Here, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of Formlabs Biomed Elastic 50A, Biomed Flexible 80A, and Biomed Durable resin using normal human dermal fibroblasts and human mesenchymal stromal cells. The sol fraction of the crosslinked and uncrosslinked materials was measured to determine the amount of leachable components in the polymer network. Following ISO 10993-5 guidelines, cytotoxicity was evaluated through direct, indirect, or extract testing for 24 h. All three materials did not elicit a cytotoxic response when assessed through fluorescence imaging and LDH assay. In each test, cells showed similar viability as cells cultured with a known noncytotoxic control, polycaprolactone, and showed significantly higher viability compared to a cytotoxic control, a polyurethane film containing 0.1% zinc diethyldithiocarbamate (ZDEC). Post-processing parameters were shown to minimize the effects of cytotoxicity when post-treated with an isopropyl alcohol wash, UV post-curing, or ethanol sterilization. Overall, the Formlabs Biomed Elastic 50A, Biomed Flexible 80A, and Biomed Durable resins were shown to exhibit minimal cytotoxicity after printing and post-processing. Further, the presented findings can be adapted to standardize in vitro testing of a wide range of commercial photocurable resins for tissue-interfacing parts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15142,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","volume":"114 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jbm.a.70169","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.a.70169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid growth of additive manufacturing technologies continues to drive the commercial development of standardized materials to streamline the process. Despite the growing range of available materials, few still achieve a balance between flexibility and biocompatibility. Here, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of Formlabs Biomed Elastic 50A, Biomed Flexible 80A, and Biomed Durable resin using normal human dermal fibroblasts and human mesenchymal stromal cells. The sol fraction of the crosslinked and uncrosslinked materials was measured to determine the amount of leachable components in the polymer network. Following ISO 10993-5 guidelines, cytotoxicity was evaluated through direct, indirect, or extract testing for 24 h. All three materials did not elicit a cytotoxic response when assessed through fluorescence imaging and LDH assay. In each test, cells showed similar viability as cells cultured with a known noncytotoxic control, polycaprolactone, and showed significantly higher viability compared to a cytotoxic control, a polyurethane film containing 0.1% zinc diethyldithiocarbamate (ZDEC). Post-processing parameters were shown to minimize the effects of cytotoxicity when post-treated with an isopropyl alcohol wash, UV post-curing, or ethanol sterilization. Overall, the Formlabs Biomed Elastic 50A, Biomed Flexible 80A, and Biomed Durable resins were shown to exhibit minimal cytotoxicity after printing and post-processing. Further, the presented findings can be adapted to standardize in vitro testing of a wide range of commercial photocurable resins for tissue-interfacing parts.

评估用于软组织增材制造的商业材料的细胞毒性。
增材制造技术的快速发展继续推动标准化材料的商业发展,以简化流程。尽管可用材料的范围越来越广,但很少有材料能够在灵活性和生物相容性之间取得平衡。在这里,我们用正常的人真皮成纤维细胞和人间充质间质细胞评估了Formlabs Biomed Elastic 50A、Biomed Flexible 80A和Biomed Durable树脂的细胞毒性。测量交联和非交联材料的溶胶分数,以确定聚合物网络中可浸出成分的数量。按照ISO 10993-5指南,通过直接、间接或提取测试24小时来评估细胞毒性。当通过荧光成像和LDH测定评估时,所有三种材料都没有引起细胞毒性反应。在每次测试中,细胞的活力与用已知的无细胞毒性对照(聚己内酯)培养的细胞相似,并且与含有0.1%二乙基二硫代氨基甲酸锌(ZDEC)的细胞毒性对照(聚氨酯膜)相比,细胞的活力明显更高。后处理参数显示,当后处理用异丙醇洗涤,紫外线后固化,或乙醇灭菌时,细胞毒性的影响最小。总体而言,Formlabs Biomed Elastic 50A、Biomed Flexible 80A和Biomed Durable树脂在打印和后处理后显示出最小的细胞毒性。此外,本文的研究结果可用于组织界面部件的各种商用光固化树脂的标准化体外测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A is an international, interdisciplinary, English-language publication of original contributions concerning studies of the preparation, performance, and evaluation of biomaterials; the chemical, physical, toxicological, and mechanical behavior of materials in physiological environments; and the response of blood and tissues to biomaterials. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on all relevant biomaterial topics including the science and technology of alloys,polymers, ceramics, and reprocessed animal and human tissues in surgery,dentistry, artificial organs, and other medical devices. The Journal also publishes articles in interdisciplinary areas such as tissue engineering and controlled release technology where biomaterials play a significant role in the performance of the medical device. The Journal of Biomedical Materials Research is the official journal of the Society for Biomaterials (USA), the Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Articles are welcomed from all scientists. Membership in the Society for Biomaterials is not a prerequisite for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书