Evaluation of Intraocular Lens (IOL) Formulae Utilizing Posterior Corneal Power in Post-Laser Vision Correction (LVC) Eyes.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2026-10-01 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S634188
Hasan Alsetri, Mitchell P Weikert, Nicole Fram, Jared Pagal, Karolinne Maia Rocha, Marcela Feltrin De Barros, Daniel H Chang, Brandon D Ayres, Damien F Goldberg, Jonathan D Solomon, Elizabeth Yeu, John Sheppard
{"title":"Evaluation of Intraocular Lens (IOL) Formulae Utilizing Posterior Corneal Power in Post-Laser Vision Correction (LVC) Eyes.","authors":"Hasan Alsetri, Mitchell P Weikert, Nicole Fram, Jared Pagal, Karolinne Maia Rocha, Marcela Feltrin De Barros, Daniel H Chang, Brandon D Ayres, Damien F Goldberg, Jonathan D Solomon, Elizabeth Yeu, John Sheppard","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S634188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae incorporating posterior corneal power vs traditional keratometry in post-laser vision correction (LVC) eyes undergoing cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multicenter study (7 sites) combined retrospective chart review and prospective enrollment of adult cataract surgery patients with prior myopic or hyperopic LVC (one study eye per patient). Preoperative biometry was obtained by swept-source optical coherence tomography, and refractive prediction accuracy was compared across six IOL formulae (Barrett True K-AK, Barrett True K-TK, EVO 2.0-AK, EVO 2.0-TK, Haigis-TK, and Shammas-Cooke) in terms of trueness (mean refractive prediction error [RPE]), precision (RPE dispersion), and accuracy (absolute error metrics and proportion of eyes within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 eyes were included. The proportion of eyes within ±0.5 D of predicted refraction was highest with EVO 2.0-TK in both post-myopic (77%) and post-hyperopic (88%) LVC eyes, with Barrett True K-TK next highest (75% and 78%, respectively); in post-myopic eyes, EVO 2.0-TK was also the only formula whose mean RPE did not differ significantly from zero.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVO 2.0-TK demonstrated the highest overall accuracy among the formulae evaluated in both post-myopic and post-hyperopic LVC eyes, while Barrett True K-TK also performed well, with both formulae achieving ≥75% of eyes within ±0.50 D in both LVC subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"20 ","pages":"634188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13637501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S634188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulae incorporating posterior corneal power vs traditional keratometry in post-laser vision correction (LVC) eyes undergoing cataract surgery.

Patients and methods: This multicenter study (7 sites) combined retrospective chart review and prospective enrollment of adult cataract surgery patients with prior myopic or hyperopic LVC (one study eye per patient). Preoperative biometry was obtained by swept-source optical coherence tomography, and refractive prediction accuracy was compared across six IOL formulae (Barrett True K-AK, Barrett True K-TK, EVO 2.0-AK, EVO 2.0-TK, Haigis-TK, and Shammas-Cooke) in terms of trueness (mean refractive prediction error [RPE]), precision (RPE dispersion), and accuracy (absolute error metrics and proportion of eyes within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D).

Results: A total of 154 eyes were included. The proportion of eyes within ±0.5 D of predicted refraction was highest with EVO 2.0-TK in both post-myopic (77%) and post-hyperopic (88%) LVC eyes, with Barrett True K-TK next highest (75% and 78%, respectively); in post-myopic eyes, EVO 2.0-TK was also the only formula whose mean RPE did not differ significantly from zero.

Conclusions: EVO 2.0-TK demonstrated the highest overall accuracy among the formulae evaluated in both post-myopic and post-hyperopic LVC eyes, while Barrett True K-TK also performed well, with both formulae achieving ≥75% of eyes within ±0.50 D in both LVC subgroups.

激光后视力矫正(LVC)眼人工晶状体(IOL)配方的评价。
目的:评价激光视力矫正(LVC)术后人工晶状体(IOL)度数计算公式与传统角膜度数法计算公式的准确性。患者和方法:本多中心研究(7个站点)结合回顾性图表回顾和前瞻性纳入既往近视或远视LVC的成人白内障手术患者(每位患者一眼研究)。通过扫描源光学相干断层扫描获得术前生物特征,并比较6种IOL公式(Barrett True K-AK、Barrett True K-TK、EVO 2.0-AK、EVO 2.0-TK、Haigis-TK和shamma - cooke)的屈光预测精度,包括正确率(平均屈光预测误差[RPE])、精度(RPE色散)和准确度(绝对误差指标和眼睛在±0.5 D和±1.0 D范围内的比例)。结果:共纳入154只眼。在近视后和远视后的LVC眼中,EVO 2.0-TK在预测屈光度±0.5 D内的比例最高(77%),其次是Barrett True K-TK(分别为75%和78%);在近视后眼,EVO 2.0-TK也是唯一一个平均RPE与零无显著差异的公式。结论:EVO 2.0-TK在近视后和远视后LVC组中均表现出最高的总体准确率,而Barrett True K-TK也表现良好,在±0.50 D内,两个LVC亚组的两种配方均达到≥75%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书