Factors Associated with HbA1c-Lowering in a Randomized Trial of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Non-Insulin-Treated Diabetes: An Observational Analysis.

IF 2.6
Jiawei Ryan Zhang, Pratima Singh, Roseanne O Yeung, Donna P Manca, Tawnya Perry, Inga Olu-Jordan, Gulelala Rahim, Evan M Hagen, Darren Lau
{"title":"Factors Associated with HbA1c-Lowering in a Randomized Trial of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Non-Insulin-Treated Diabetes: An Observational Analysis.","authors":"Jiawei Ryan Zhang, Pratima Singh, Roseanne O Yeung, Donna P Manca, Tawnya Perry, Inga Olu-Jordan, Gulelala Rahim, Evan M Hagen, Darren Lau","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjd.2026.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A prior randomized trial showed that CGM lowers HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes and elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c > 7.0%) not on insulin.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We examined the effect modifiers of CGM effectiveness, and factors associated with HbA1c-lowering.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of data from a randomized trial. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline to 12 weeks. Explanatory variables included sociodemographics, diabetes and treatment parameters, and neighbourhood environment characteristics. Variables were assessed for interaction with CGM using linear regression, which was also used to estimate associations between each variable and HbA1c change, and to develop a final multi-variable adjusted-model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 86 individuals. No formal interactions were identified with CGM effectiveness, though noticeable numeric differences in the effect of CGM were seen with sex, recent diagnosis, and neighbourhood walkability. Aside from CGM treatment allocation (β=-0.65, p=0.003 95% CI [-1.07 to -0.22]), multi-variable predictors of HbA1c-lowering were higher baseline HbA1c (β =-0.71, p<0.001 [-0.-90 to -0.53]), diabetes diagnosis < 1 year (β=-1.06, p=0.004 [-1.77 to -0.35]), male sex (β=-0.51, p=0.017 [-0.93 to -0.09]), and not using sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor medication at baseline (β=0.62, p=0.006 [0.18 to 1.05]). Neighbourhood walkability was associated with HbA1c-lowering on crude (β=-0.26, p=0.041 [-0.51 to -0.01]), but not adjusted, analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Further studies are needed to determine the factors influencing the effectiveness of CGM. Individuals with type 2 diabetes, not on insulin, who voluntarily seek CGM, may experience a reduction in HbA1c proportional to their baseline HbA1c, regardless of treatment allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93918,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2026.09.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A prior randomized trial showed that CGM lowers HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes and elevated glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c > 7.0%) not on insulin.

Objectives: We examined the effect modifiers of CGM effectiveness, and factors associated with HbA1c-lowering.

Methods: Secondary analysis of data from a randomized trial. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline to 12 weeks. Explanatory variables included sociodemographics, diabetes and treatment parameters, and neighbourhood environment characteristics. Variables were assessed for interaction with CGM using linear regression, which was also used to estimate associations between each variable and HbA1c change, and to develop a final multi-variable adjusted-model.

Results: We included 86 individuals. No formal interactions were identified with CGM effectiveness, though noticeable numeric differences in the effect of CGM were seen with sex, recent diagnosis, and neighbourhood walkability. Aside from CGM treatment allocation (β=-0.65, p=0.003 95% CI [-1.07 to -0.22]), multi-variable predictors of HbA1c-lowering were higher baseline HbA1c (β =-0.71, p<0.001 [-0.-90 to -0.53]), diabetes diagnosis < 1 year (β=-1.06, p=0.004 [-1.77 to -0.35]), male sex (β=-0.51, p=0.017 [-0.93 to -0.09]), and not using sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor medication at baseline (β=0.62, p=0.006 [0.18 to 1.05]). Neighbourhood walkability was associated with HbA1c-lowering on crude (β=-0.26, p=0.041 [-0.51 to -0.01]), but not adjusted, analysis.

Conclusions: Further studies are needed to determine the factors influencing the effectiveness of CGM. Individuals with type 2 diabetes, not on insulin, who voluntarily seek CGM, may experience a reduction in HbA1c proportional to their baseline HbA1c, regardless of treatment allocation.

在一项对非胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者进行连续血糖监测的随机试验中,与hba1c降低相关的因素:一项观察性分析。
背景:先前的一项随机试验显示,CGM可降低成人2型糖尿病患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c升高7.0%),而不需要胰岛素。目的:我们检查了CGM有效性的影响因素,以及与hba1c降低相关的因素。方法:对随机试验资料进行二次分析。主要终点是HbA1c从基线到12周的变化。解释变量包括社会人口统计学、糖尿病和治疗参数以及社区环境特征。使用线性回归评估变量与CGM的相互作用,线性回归也用于估计每个变量与HbA1c变化之间的关联,并开发最终的多变量调整模型。结果:纳入86例个体。没有正式的相互作用被确定为CGM的有效性,尽管CGM的效果与性别、最近的诊断和邻里步行性有明显的数字差异。除了CGM治疗分配(β=-0.65, p=0.003 95% CI[-1.07 ~ -0.22])外,HbA1c降低的多变量预测因子为较高的基线HbA1c (β= -0.71, p)。结论:影响CGM有效性的因素需要进一步研究。2型糖尿病患者,不使用胰岛素,自愿接受CGM治疗,无论治疗分配如何,其HbA1c的降低可能与基线HbA1c成正比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书