Small Airway Dysfunction in Asthma: Associations with Control and Quality of Life.

IF 0.8 0 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Thoracic research and practice Pub Date : 2026-10-21 Epub Date: 2026-10-07 DOI:10.4274/ThoracResPract.2026.2026-1-7
Demet Polat Yuluğ, Sibel Naycı, Bahar Taşdelen, Eylem Sercan Özgür, Cengiz Özge
{"title":"Small Airway Dysfunction in Asthma: Associations with Control and Quality of Life.","authors":"Demet Polat Yuluğ, Sibel Naycı, Bahar Taşdelen, Eylem Sercan Özgür, Cengiz Özge","doi":"10.4274/ThoracResPract.2026.2026-1-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Small airway dysfunction (SAD) is an important but frequently underrecognized component of asthma. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of SAD in asthma, as assessed by impulse oscillometry (IOS), and to evaluate its association with clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study, with a 12-month prospective follow-up, included adult patients with asthma. SAD was defined by IOS as R5-R20 ≥0.07 kPa·s·L-<sup>1</sup>. The asthma control test (ACT) and the asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) were administered. Exacerbations were prospectively recorded during the 12 months after enrollment. Patients were stratified according to the presence of SAD. Clinical and functional parameters were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SAD was identified in 63 of 98 participants (64.3%). SAD prevalence differed significantly across the five Global Initiative for Asthma treatment steps (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Patients with SAD had significantly lower ACT scores (<i>P</i> = 0.021), poorer quality of life (AQLQ, <i>P</i> = 0.002), and more frequent exacerbations (<i>P</i> < 0.001) than those without SAD. In multivariable regression analyses, higher R5-R20 was independently associated with a lower AQLQ score (β = -0.18, 95% confidence interval -0.30 to -0.07; <i>P</i> = 0.002) and higher odds of being in a worse asthma control category (odds ratio 1.33, <i>P</i> = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAD is common among patients with asthma and is associated with poorer asthma control, lower quality of life, and an increased exacerbation burden. Higher R5-R20 remained associated with poorer quality of life after adjustment for spirometry, whereas its association with asthma control was attenuated and became non-significant after adjustment for forced expiratory volume in the first second. These findings support further evaluation of IOS-defined SAD as a potentially clinically relevant trait in asthma.</p>","PeriodicalId":75221,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic research and practice","volume":" ","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13687689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ThoracResPract.2026.2026-1-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Small airway dysfunction (SAD) is an important but frequently underrecognized component of asthma. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of SAD in asthma, as assessed by impulse oscillometry (IOS), and to evaluate its association with clinical outcomes.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional study, with a 12-month prospective follow-up, included adult patients with asthma. SAD was defined by IOS as R5-R20 ≥0.07 kPa·s·L-1. The asthma control test (ACT) and the asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) were administered. Exacerbations were prospectively recorded during the 12 months after enrollment. Patients were stratified according to the presence of SAD. Clinical and functional parameters were compared between groups.

Results: SAD was identified in 63 of 98 participants (64.3%). SAD prevalence differed significantly across the five Global Initiative for Asthma treatment steps (P < 0.001). Patients with SAD had significantly lower ACT scores (P = 0.021), poorer quality of life (AQLQ, P = 0.002), and more frequent exacerbations (P < 0.001) than those without SAD. In multivariable regression analyses, higher R5-R20 was independently associated with a lower AQLQ score (β = -0.18, 95% confidence interval -0.30 to -0.07; P = 0.002) and higher odds of being in a worse asthma control category (odds ratio 1.33, P = 0.010).

Conclusion: SAD is common among patients with asthma and is associated with poorer asthma control, lower quality of life, and an increased exacerbation burden. Higher R5-R20 remained associated with poorer quality of life after adjustment for spirometry, whereas its association with asthma control was attenuated and became non-significant after adjustment for forced expiratory volume in the first second. These findings support further evaluation of IOS-defined SAD as a potentially clinically relevant trait in asthma.

哮喘小气道功能障碍:与控制和生活质量的关系。
目的:小气道功能障碍(SAD)是哮喘的一个重要但经常被忽视的组成部分。本研究旨在确定SAD在哮喘中的患病率,通过脉冲振荡测量(IOS)来评估,并评估其与临床结果的关系。材料和方法:本横断面研究,前瞻性随访12个月,纳入成年哮喘患者。IOS将SAD定义为R5-R20≥0.07 kPa·s·L-1。进行哮喘控制测试(ACT)和哮喘生活质量问卷(AQLQ)。在入组后的12个月内前瞻性地记录恶化情况。根据有无SAD对患者进行分层。比较两组患者的临床及功能指标。结果:98名参与者中有63人(64.3%)被确诊为SAD。SAD患病率在五个全球哮喘治疗步骤中存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。与非SAD患者相比,SAD患者ACT评分显著降低(P = 0.021),生活质量较差(AQLQ, P = 0.002),加重频率更高(P < 0.001)。在多变量回归分析中,较高的R5-R20与较低的AQLQ评分(β = -0.18, 95%可信区间-0.30 ~ -0.07;P = 0.002)和较高的哮喘控制较差类别的几率独立相关(优势比1.33,P = 0.010)。结论:SAD在哮喘患者中很常见,并与较差的哮喘控制、较低的生活质量和加重的加重负担相关。调整肺活量后,较高的R5-R20仍与较差的生活质量相关,而在调整第一秒用力呼气量后,其与哮喘控制的相关性减弱,变得不显著。这些发现支持进一步评估ios定义的SAD作为哮喘的潜在临床相关特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书