Estimated Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Diameter: Proposal of an Equation for Clinical Use in Adults from The ELSA Brasil Study data.

IF 1.9
Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia Pub Date : 2026-09-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.36660/abc.20260036
Giulia Bevilacqua Schmitz, Bruce Bartholow Duncan, Murilo Foppa, Angela Barreto Santiago Santos
{"title":"Estimated Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Diameter: Proposal of an Equation for Clinical Use in Adults from The ELSA Brasil Study data.","authors":"Giulia Bevilacqua Schmitz, Bruce Bartholow Duncan, Murilo Foppa, Angela Barreto Santiago Santos","doi":"10.36660/abc.20260036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) is essential for estimating stroke volume and aortic stenosis severity, but technical limitations may affect its accuracy. A predicted LVOTd may overcome these issues, though it has not been validated in large populations. We studied the participants of the representative random sample and with ≥ 60 y-o from the Elsa-Brasil study with echocardiogram performed (n=3,267), divided into a derivation (70%) and a validation subgroup (30%). In the derivation cohort, independent determinants of LVOTd were identified, and a regression equation was derived. In the validation cohort, the performance of LVOTELSA was evaluated and compared with previously published formulas. In our derivation sample (n= 1,822; 58.9 ± 9.5 y-o; 52% females), the mean measured LVOTd was 19.5 ± 2.5 mm. The strongest predictors of LVOTd were sex, height, aortic root diameter (AoDiam), and LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), deriving the equation LVOTELSA = 0.03 + [0.59 x male] + [0.04 x height] + [0.22 x AoDiam] + [0.13 x LVEDD]. In the validation sample (n=739), LVOTELSA showed a high correlation (r=0.63) with measured LVOTd with similar agreement to LVOTPestelli (r=0.61), but worse with LVOTBSA(r=0.47). These differences are reflected in relevant differences in stroke volumes. LVOTELSA showed good performance in a general adult population and may be used as an alternative when direct echocardiographic measurement of LVOTd is not feasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"123 8","pages":"e20260036"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13671728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20260036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOTd) is essential for estimating stroke volume and aortic stenosis severity, but technical limitations may affect its accuracy. A predicted LVOTd may overcome these issues, though it has not been validated in large populations. We studied the participants of the representative random sample and with ≥ 60 y-o from the Elsa-Brasil study with echocardiogram performed (n=3,267), divided into a derivation (70%) and a validation subgroup (30%). In the derivation cohort, independent determinants of LVOTd were identified, and a regression equation was derived. In the validation cohort, the performance of LVOTELSA was evaluated and compared with previously published formulas. In our derivation sample (n= 1,822; 58.9 ± 9.5 y-o; 52% females), the mean measured LVOTd was 19.5 ± 2.5 mm. The strongest predictors of LVOTd were sex, height, aortic root diameter (AoDiam), and LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), deriving the equation LVOTELSA = 0.03 + [0.59 x male] + [0.04 x height] + [0.22 x AoDiam] + [0.13 x LVEDD]. In the validation sample (n=739), LVOTELSA showed a high correlation (r=0.63) with measured LVOTd with similar agreement to LVOTPestelli (r=0.61), but worse with LVOTBSA(r=0.47). These differences are reflected in relevant differences in stroke volumes. LVOTELSA showed good performance in a general adult population and may be used as an alternative when direct echocardiographic measurement of LVOTd is not feasible.

估计左心室流出道直径:来自ELSA巴西研究数据的成人临床应用公式的建议。
左心室流出道直径(LVOTd)是估计脑卒中容量和主动脉狭窄严重程度的必要指标,但技术限制可能影响其准确性。预测的LVOTd可能会克服这些问题,尽管它尚未在大量人群中得到验证。我们研究了Elsa-Brasil研究中具有代表性的随机样本和≥60 y-o的参与者,并进行了超声心动图检查(n= 3267),分为衍生组(70%)和验证组(30%)。在衍生队列中,确定了LVOTd的独立决定因素,并推导了回归方程。在验证队列中,对LVOTELSA的性能进行了评估,并与先前发表的公式进行了比较。在我们的衍生样本(n= 1822; 58.9±9.5 y-o; 52%女性)中,测量到的平均LVOTd为19.5±2.5 mm。LVOTd的最强预测因子是性别、身高、主动脉根直径(AoDiam)和左室舒张末期直径(LVEDD),得出LVOTELSA = 0.03 +[0.59倍男性]+[0.04倍身高]+[0.22倍AoDiam] +[0.13倍LVEDD]。在验证样本(n=739)中,LVOTELSA与测量的LVOTd具有较高的相关性(r=0.63),与LVOTPestelli具有相似的一致性(r=0.61),但与LVOTBSA的相关性较差(r=0.47)。这些差异反映在卒中容量的相关差异上。LVOTELSA在一般成人人群中表现良好,可作为直接超声心动图测量LVOTd不可行的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书