Climate-related health and sustainable healthcare activities of U.S. professional medical societies: a mixed-methods analysis.

IF 4.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sara Locke, David Han, Thomas Bush, Tamiko R Katsumoto, Nicole Duritz, Sawyer Hall, Jeannette R Ickovics, Hardeep Singh, Lucy Walker, Lisa Patel, Jodi D Sherman
{"title":"Climate-related health and sustainable healthcare activities of U.S. professional medical societies: a mixed-methods analysis.","authors":"Sara Locke, David Han, Thomas Bush, Tamiko R Katsumoto, Nicole Duritz, Sawyer Hall, Jeannette R Ickovics, Hardeep Singh, Lucy Walker, Lisa Patel, Jodi D Sherman","doi":"10.1093/acamed/wvag277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The authors characterize how U.S. professional medical societies are addressing climate-related health impacts and sustainable healthcare practices, and identify barriers and priorities for advancing a climate-fit healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ninety-five U.S. medical societies were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews (September 2024-February 2025); websites of all 95 societies were reviewed for publicly available content (July-August 2025). Both sources were assessed for engagement across 6 domains: member education, patient education, sustainable clinical practice guidance, research and innovation, policy and advocacy, and governance. Interview responses were scored from 0 (none) to 2 (robust) and summed into an engagement index (range 0-12); open-ended responses were analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight of 95 invited societies participated, yielding 34 interviewees. Most reported activity in at least one domain, but few demonstrated comprehensive engagement; total scores ranged from 1 to 11 of 12 (Mdn = 6.5). Member education was most common (25/28 [89.3%]), while fewer societies reported research initiatives (6/28 [21.4%]) or patient education (3/28 [10.7%]) initiatives. Thematic analysis identified six needs: mobilizing members to support cultural change, strengthening the evidence base for specialty-specific actions, improving specialty-specific education for clinicians and patients, increasing collaboration and knowledge sharing across societies, establishing policy frameworks and enforceable standards, and building internal capacity through staffing and resources. Website review revealed limited public visibility relative to reported activity: member education appeared on 48.4% (46/95) of websites, patient education on 10.5% (10/95), and climate-related content on just 2.1% of homepages (2/95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical societies are beginning to engage with climate-related health and healthcare sustainability, but efforts remain nascent and fragmented. With clearer professional standards, collaboration, and institutional support, societies could advance organized action to prepare for a changing climate and promote sustainable healthcare practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acamed/wvag277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The authors characterize how U.S. professional medical societies are addressing climate-related health impacts and sustainable healthcare practices, and identify barriers and priorities for advancing a climate-fit healthcare system.

Method: Ninety-five U.S. medical societies were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews (September 2024-February 2025); websites of all 95 societies were reviewed for publicly available content (July-August 2025). Both sources were assessed for engagement across 6 domains: member education, patient education, sustainable clinical practice guidance, research and innovation, policy and advocacy, and governance. Interview responses were scored from 0 (none) to 2 (robust) and summed into an engagement index (range 0-12); open-ended responses were analyzed thematically.

Results: Twenty-eight of 95 invited societies participated, yielding 34 interviewees. Most reported activity in at least one domain, but few demonstrated comprehensive engagement; total scores ranged from 1 to 11 of 12 (Mdn = 6.5). Member education was most common (25/28 [89.3%]), while fewer societies reported research initiatives (6/28 [21.4%]) or patient education (3/28 [10.7%]) initiatives. Thematic analysis identified six needs: mobilizing members to support cultural change, strengthening the evidence base for specialty-specific actions, improving specialty-specific education for clinicians and patients, increasing collaboration and knowledge sharing across societies, establishing policy frameworks and enforceable standards, and building internal capacity through staffing and resources. Website review revealed limited public visibility relative to reported activity: member education appeared on 48.4% (46/95) of websites, patient education on 10.5% (10/95), and climate-related content on just 2.1% of homepages (2/95).

Conclusions: Medical societies are beginning to engage with climate-related health and healthcare sustainability, but efforts remain nascent and fragmented. With clearer professional standards, collaboration, and institutional support, societies could advance organized action to prepare for a changing climate and promote sustainable healthcare practices.

美国专业医学协会的气候相关健康和可持续医疗活动:混合方法分析。
目的:作者描述了美国专业医学协会如何解决与气候相关的健康影响和可持续医疗实践,并确定了推进气候适应医疗体系的障碍和优先事项。方法:邀请95个美国医学学会参加半结构化访谈(2024年9月- 2025年2月);对所有95个学会的网站进行公开内容审查(2025年7月至8月)。评估了这两个来源在6个领域的参与情况:成员教育、患者教育、可持续临床实践指导、研究和创新、政策和倡导以及治理。访谈回答的得分从0(无)到2(稳健),并汇总成参与度指数(范围0-12);对开放式回答进行主题分析。结果:95个受邀社团中有28个参与,产生34个受访者。大多数报告的活动至少在一个领域,但很少显示全面参与;总分为1 ~ 11分(Mdn = 6.5)。会员教育是最常见的(25/28[89.3%]),而较少的学会报告了研究倡议(6/28[21.4%])或患者教育(3/28[10.7%])。专题分析确定了六项需求:动员成员支持文化变革,加强专科行动的证据基础,改善对临床医生和患者的专科教育,加强社会间的合作和知识共享,建立政策框架和可执行的标准,以及通过人员配备和资源建设内部能力。网站审查显示,相对于报道的活动,公众知名度有限:会员教育出现在48.4%(46/95)的网站上,患者教育出现在10.5%(10/95)的网站上,与气候相关的内容只出现在2.1%的网站上(2/95)。结论:医学协会开始参与与气候相关的健康和医疗保健可持续性,但这些努力仍处于初级阶段,而且支离破碎。有了更明确的专业标准、合作和机构支持,社会可以推进有组织的行动,为气候变化做好准备,并促进可持续的医疗保健实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书