Miguel Viana Pereira Filho, Gabriel Ferraz Ferreira, Peter Lam, Thomas Lorchan Lewis, Daniel Sonnewend Proença, Paulo Feliciano Sarquis Dias, Mauro Cesar Mattos E Dinato, Rodrigo Pagnano
{"title":"Neck vs head interspace ratios in hallux valgus: A reliability analysis of first metatarsal radiographic measurements.","authors":"Miguel Viana Pereira Filho, Gabriel Ferraz Ferreira, Peter Lam, Thomas Lorchan Lewis, Daniel Sonnewend Proença, Paulo Feliciano Sarquis Dias, Mauro Cesar Mattos E Dinato, Rodrigo Pagnano","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2026.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between the intermetatarsal space and first metatarsal width has been proposed as a radiographic parameter for surgical planning in hallux valgus. However, the reproducibility of the previously described Head Interspace Ratio (HIR) has not been formally evaluated, limiting confidence in its clinical application.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Head Interspace Ratio (HIR) and the newly proposed Neck Interspace Ratio (NIR).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional reliability study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty standardized weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs were independently evaluated by three observers with different experience levels during two sessions. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Agreement and measurement precision were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NIR demonstrated good to excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC, 0.876-0.963) and good interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.886; 95% CI, 0.826-0.929). HIR showed greater variability, with good reproducibility for the two more experienced observers but poor reliability for the least experienced observer (ICC = 0.236; 95% CI, -0.043 to 0.481). Interobserver reliability was lower for HIR (ICC = 0.464; 95% CI, 0.276-0.633). Measurement error was lower for NIR than HIR (MDC95, 0.167 vs 0.277).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under the conditions evaluated in this study, NIR demonstrated greater reproducibility and lower measurement error than HIR. These findings suggest that NIR may represent a more robust radiographic parameter and support further clinical investigation before its use in surgical decision-making for hallux valgus.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2026.09.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The relationship between the intermetatarsal space and first metatarsal width has been proposed as a radiographic parameter for surgical planning in hallux valgus. However, the reproducibility of the previously described Head Interspace Ratio (HIR) has not been formally evaluated, limiting confidence in its clinical application.
Purpose: To compare the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Head Interspace Ratio (HIR) and the newly proposed Neck Interspace Ratio (NIR).
Study design: Retrospective cross-sectional reliability study.
Methods: Fifty standardized weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs were independently evaluated by three observers with different experience levels during two sessions. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Agreement and measurement precision were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level.
Results: NIR demonstrated good to excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC, 0.876-0.963) and good interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.886; 95% CI, 0.826-0.929). HIR showed greater variability, with good reproducibility for the two more experienced observers but poor reliability for the least experienced observer (ICC = 0.236; 95% CI, -0.043 to 0.481). Interobserver reliability was lower for HIR (ICC = 0.464; 95% CI, 0.276-0.633). Measurement error was lower for NIR than HIR (MDC95, 0.167 vs 0.277).
Conclusions: Under the conditions evaluated in this study, NIR demonstrated greater reproducibility and lower measurement error than HIR. These findings suggest that NIR may represent a more robust radiographic parameter and support further clinical investigation before its use in surgical decision-making for hallux valgus.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.