Neck vs head interspace ratios in hallux valgus: A reliability analysis of first metatarsal radiographic measurements.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Miguel Viana Pereira Filho, Gabriel Ferraz Ferreira, Peter Lam, Thomas Lorchan Lewis, Daniel Sonnewend Proença, Paulo Feliciano Sarquis Dias, Mauro Cesar Mattos E Dinato, Rodrigo Pagnano
{"title":"Neck vs head interspace ratios in hallux valgus: A reliability analysis of first metatarsal radiographic measurements.","authors":"Miguel Viana Pereira Filho, Gabriel Ferraz Ferreira, Peter Lam, Thomas Lorchan Lewis, Daniel Sonnewend Proença, Paulo Feliciano Sarquis Dias, Mauro Cesar Mattos E Dinato, Rodrigo Pagnano","doi":"10.1053/j.jfas.2026.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relationship between the intermetatarsal space and first metatarsal width has been proposed as a radiographic parameter for surgical planning in hallux valgus. However, the reproducibility of the previously described Head Interspace Ratio (HIR) has not been formally evaluated, limiting confidence in its clinical application.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Head Interspace Ratio (HIR) and the newly proposed Neck Interspace Ratio (NIR).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cross-sectional reliability study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty standardized weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs were independently evaluated by three observers with different experience levels during two sessions. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Agreement and measurement precision were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NIR demonstrated good to excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC, 0.876-0.963) and good interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.886; 95% CI, 0.826-0.929). HIR showed greater variability, with good reproducibility for the two more experienced observers but poor reliability for the least experienced observer (ICC = 0.236; 95% CI, -0.043 to 0.481). Interobserver reliability was lower for HIR (ICC = 0.464; 95% CI, 0.276-0.633). Measurement error was lower for NIR than HIR (MDC95, 0.167 vs 0.277).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under the conditions evaluated in this study, NIR demonstrated greater reproducibility and lower measurement error than HIR. These findings suggest that NIR may represent a more robust radiographic parameter and support further clinical investigation before its use in surgical decision-making for hallux valgus.</p>","PeriodicalId":50191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2026.09.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relationship between the intermetatarsal space and first metatarsal width has been proposed as a radiographic parameter for surgical planning in hallux valgus. However, the reproducibility of the previously described Head Interspace Ratio (HIR) has not been formally evaluated, limiting confidence in its clinical application.

Purpose: To compare the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the Head Interspace Ratio (HIR) and the newly proposed Neck Interspace Ratio (NIR).

Study design: Retrospective cross-sectional reliability study.

Methods: Fifty standardized weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs were independently evaluated by three observers with different experience levels during two sessions. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Agreement and measurement precision were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change at the 95% confidence level.

Results: NIR demonstrated good to excellent intraobserver reliability (ICC, 0.876-0.963) and good interobserver reliability (ICC = 0.886; 95% CI, 0.826-0.929). HIR showed greater variability, with good reproducibility for the two more experienced observers but poor reliability for the least experienced observer (ICC = 0.236; 95% CI, -0.043 to 0.481). Interobserver reliability was lower for HIR (ICC = 0.464; 95% CI, 0.276-0.633). Measurement error was lower for NIR than HIR (MDC95, 0.167 vs 0.277).

Conclusions: Under the conditions evaluated in this study, NIR demonstrated greater reproducibility and lower measurement error than HIR. These findings suggest that NIR may represent a more robust radiographic parameter and support further clinical investigation before its use in surgical decision-making for hallux valgus.

拇外翻的颈与头间隙比:第一跖骨x线测量的可靠性分析。
背景:跖骨间隙和第一跖骨宽度之间的关系已被提出作为拇外翻手术计划的影像学参数。然而,先前描述的头部间隙比(HIR)的可重复性尚未得到正式评估,限制了其临床应用的信心。目的:比较头部间距比(HIR)和新提出的颈部间距比(NIR)在观察者内部和观察者之间的信度。研究设计:回顾性横断面可靠性研究。方法:50张标准化负重正位x线片由三名不同经验水平的观察者独立评估。采用类内相关系数(ICC)评估信度。使用Bland-Altman分析、测量标准误差和95%置信水平下的最小可检测变化来评估一致性和测量精度。结果:近红外显示出良好至优异的观察者内信度(ICC, 0.876-0.963)和良好的观察者间信度(ICC = 0.886;95% CI, 0.826-0.929)。HIR表现出更大的可变性,对两个经验丰富的观察者具有良好的再现性,但对经验最少的观察者具有较差的可靠性(ICC = 0.236;95% CI, -0.043至0.481)。HIR的观察者间信度较低(ICC = 0.464;95% CI, 0.276-0.633)。近红外测量误差低于高红外(MDC95, 0.167 vs 0.277)。结论:在本研究评估的条件下,NIR比HIR具有更高的重现性和更低的测量误差。这些发现表明,近红外影像可能是一个更可靠的放射学参数,并支持进一步的临床研究,然后再用于拇外翻的手术决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery
Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
234
审稿时长
29.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery is the leading source for original, clinically-focused articles on the surgical and medical management of the foot and ankle. Each bi-monthly, peer-reviewed issue addresses relevant topics to the profession, such as: adult reconstruction of the forefoot; adult reconstruction of the hindfoot and ankle; diabetes; medicine/rheumatology; pediatrics; research; sports medicine; trauma; and tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书