Exploring a potential healthy survivor bias in retinopathy of prematurity.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Nikita Mokhashi, Rebecca E Tanenbaum, Alejandra G de Alba Campomanes, Alexis K Warren, Michael P Blair, Simmer Beniwal, Sarah H Rodriguez
{"title":"Exploring a potential healthy survivor bias in retinopathy of prematurity.","authors":"Nikita Mokhashi, Rebecca E Tanenbaum, Alejandra G de Alba Campomanes, Alexis K Warren, Michael P Blair, Simmer Beniwal, Sarah H Rodriguez","doi":"10.1016/j.jaapos.2026.105307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess whether a healthy survivor bias contributes to the association between Black race and less severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluating all infants eligible for ROP screening between January 1, 2012 and May 1, 2023. Race/ethnicity was considered as a combined variable: non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic or Latino, and non-Hispanic White. The outcome measures were type 1 ROP, death before 50 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA), or the composite outcome of death or type 1 ROP. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and each outcome measure, adjusting for birth weight, gestational age, sex, and area deprivation index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,087 infants, 785 (72.2%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 48 (4.42%) received ROP treatment. Comparing non-Hispanic Black infants with non-Hispanic White infants, there were no significant differences in ROP treatment (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 0.49-4.82), death before 50 weeks' postmenstrual age (OR = 1.60; 95% CI, 0.82-3.11), or composite outcome (OR = 1.63; 95% CI, 0.87-3.06). Comparing non-Hispanic Black infants with Hispanic/Latino infants, there were also no significant differences in ROP treatment (OR = 2.09; 95% CI, 0.92-4.81), death before 50 weeks' postmenstrual age (OR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.52-1.72), or composite outcome (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.72-2.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data from a single-center, majority Black population indicate that a healthy survivor effect among Black infants was not detected. Further studies across diverse settings are needed, however, given the consequences of missing this potential bias in studies assessing race/ethnicity and ROP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aapos","volume":" ","pages":"105307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aapos","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2026.105307","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess whether a healthy survivor bias contributes to the association between Black race and less severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).

Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluating all infants eligible for ROP screening between January 1, 2012 and May 1, 2023. Race/ethnicity was considered as a combined variable: non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic or Latino, and non-Hispanic White. The outcome measures were type 1 ROP, death before 50 weeks' postmenstrual age (PMA), or the composite outcome of death or type 1 ROP. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and each outcome measure, adjusting for birth weight, gestational age, sex, and area deprivation index.

Results: Of 1,087 infants, 785 (72.2%) were non-Hispanic Black, and 48 (4.42%) received ROP treatment. Comparing non-Hispanic Black infants with non-Hispanic White infants, there were no significant differences in ROP treatment (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 0.49-4.82), death before 50 weeks' postmenstrual age (OR = 1.60; 95% CI, 0.82-3.11), or composite outcome (OR = 1.63; 95% CI, 0.87-3.06). Comparing non-Hispanic Black infants with Hispanic/Latino infants, there were also no significant differences in ROP treatment (OR = 2.09; 95% CI, 0.92-4.81), death before 50 weeks' postmenstrual age (OR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.52-1.72), or composite outcome (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.72-2.14).

Conclusions: Data from a single-center, majority Black population indicate that a healthy survivor effect among Black infants was not detected. Further studies across diverse settings are needed, however, given the consequences of missing this potential bias in studies assessing race/ethnicity and ROP.

探讨早产儿视网膜病变的潜在健康幸存者偏倚。
目的:评估健康幸存者偏倚是否有助于黑人种族与轻度早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)之间的关联。方法:这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,评估2012年1月1日至2023年5月1日期间所有符合ROP筛查条件的婴儿。种族/民族被认为是一个组合变量:非西班牙裔黑人、西班牙裔或拉丁裔和非西班牙裔白人。结局指标为1型ROP、经后50周前死亡(PMA)或死亡或1型ROP的复合结局。采用多变量logistic回归模型,在调整出生体重、胎龄、性别和地区剥夺指数后,评估种族/民族与各结局指标之间的关系。结果:1087例婴儿中,785例(72.2%)为非西班牙裔黑人,48例(4.42%)接受ROP治疗。将非西班牙裔黑人婴儿与非西班牙裔白人婴儿进行比较,在ROP治疗(OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 0.49-4.82)、经后50周前死亡(OR = 1.60; 95% CI, 0.82-3.11)或综合结局(OR = 1.63; 95% CI, 0.87-3.06)方面无显著差异。将非西班牙裔黑人婴儿与西班牙裔/拉丁裔婴儿进行比较,在ROP治疗(OR = 2.09; 95% CI, 0.92-4.81)、经后50周前死亡(OR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.52-1.72)或综合结局(OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 0.72-2.14)方面也没有显著差异。结论:来自单中心、多数黑人人群的数据表明,在黑人婴儿中没有检测到健康的幸存者效应。然而,考虑到在评估种族/民族和ROP的研究中缺少这种潜在偏见的后果,需要在不同环境下进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Aapos
Journal of Aapos 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Journal of AAPOS presents expert information on children''s eye diseases and on strabismus as it affects all age groups. Major articles by leading experts in the field cover clinical and investigative studies, treatments, case reports, surgical techniques, descriptions of instrumentation, current concept reviews, and new diagnostic techniques. The Journal is the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书