Biologic Injection-Related Pain in Severe Asthma, Its Impact on Treatment Aversion, and Pain-Relief Approach: A Multicenter Observational Study.

IF 7.2 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Takeshi Matsumoto, Megumi Aizawa-Abe, Naoki Yamamoto, Akiko Iri, Takahiro Fujiki, Yusuke Kusakabe, Emi Nakayama, Mayuko Tashima, Chikara Ito, Kodai Miyamoto, Reina Kitagawa, Yusei Fukushima, Akihiro Noda, Masanori Azuma, Tetsuya Ueda, Kensaku Aihara
{"title":"Biologic Injection-Related Pain in Severe Asthma, Its Impact on Treatment Aversion, and Pain-Relief Approach: A Multicenter Observational Study.","authors":"Takeshi Matsumoto, Megumi Aizawa-Abe, Naoki Yamamoto, Akiko Iri, Takahiro Fujiki, Yusuke Kusakabe, Emi Nakayama, Mayuko Tashima, Chikara Ito, Kodai Miyamoto, Reina Kitagawa, Yusei Fukushima, Akihiro Noda, Masanori Azuma, Tetsuya Ueda, Kensaku Aihara","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2026.09.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although biologic therapies are essential for managing severe asthma, injection-related pain may be a frequently overlooked barrier to treatment persistence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify biologic injection-related pain in asthma cases, identify clinical factors associated with such pain and treatment aversion, and explore practical pain-relief approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter observational study enrolled patients with asthma receiving biologics between May 2025 and March 2026. Insertion pain, injection pain, and treatment aversion attributable to injection-related pain were assessed using 0 to 10 visual analog scales. Associations between clinical factors, pain scores, and treatment aversion scores and the effects of local pressure and cooling at the injection site were evaluated. Patients with diabetes mellitus receiving tirzepatide served as a reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 122 biologic-treated and 27 tirzepatide-treated patient responses were analyzed. Mean insertion and injection pain scores for biologics were 3.00 ± 2.60 and 3.28 ± 2.91, respectively. Adjusted pain scores did not differ significantly across biologics and tirzepatide. Insertion pain was associated with anxiety and arm injection, whereas injection pain was associated with younger age and female sex. Both insertion and injection pain showed independent associations with log-transformed treatment aversion score (unstandardized regression coefficient [B] = 0.08, 95% CI, 0.03-0.12, and B = 0.07, 95% CI, 0.03-0.11, respectively). Injection-site cooling significantly reduced both pain types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients receiving biologics for asthma, injection-related pain is common and independently associated with treatment aversion. Local cooling may offer a simple approach to reducing injection-related pain and addressing treatment aversion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2026.09.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although biologic therapies are essential for managing severe asthma, injection-related pain may be a frequently overlooked barrier to treatment persistence.

Objective: To quantify biologic injection-related pain in asthma cases, identify clinical factors associated with such pain and treatment aversion, and explore practical pain-relief approaches.

Methods: This multicenter observational study enrolled patients with asthma receiving biologics between May 2025 and March 2026. Insertion pain, injection pain, and treatment aversion attributable to injection-related pain were assessed using 0 to 10 visual analog scales. Associations between clinical factors, pain scores, and treatment aversion scores and the effects of local pressure and cooling at the injection site were evaluated. Patients with diabetes mellitus receiving tirzepatide served as a reference group.

Results: In total, 122 biologic-treated and 27 tirzepatide-treated patient responses were analyzed. Mean insertion and injection pain scores for biologics were 3.00 ± 2.60 and 3.28 ± 2.91, respectively. Adjusted pain scores did not differ significantly across biologics and tirzepatide. Insertion pain was associated with anxiety and arm injection, whereas injection pain was associated with younger age and female sex. Both insertion and injection pain showed independent associations with log-transformed treatment aversion score (unstandardized regression coefficient [B] = 0.08, 95% CI, 0.03-0.12, and B = 0.07, 95% CI, 0.03-0.11, respectively). Injection-site cooling significantly reduced both pain types.

Conclusions: Among patients receiving biologics for asthma, injection-related pain is common and independently associated with treatment aversion. Local cooling may offer a simple approach to reducing injection-related pain and addressing treatment aversion.

严重哮喘患者的生物注射相关疼痛及其对治疗厌恶的影响和疼痛缓解方法:一项多中心观察性研究。
背景:尽管生物治疗对于治疗严重哮喘至关重要,但注射相关疼痛可能是一个经常被忽视的持续治疗障碍。目的:对哮喘患者的生物注射相关疼痛进行定量分析,确定与此类疼痛和治疗厌恶相关的临床因素,并探讨实用的缓解疼痛的方法。方法:这项多中心观察性研究纳入了2025年5月至2026年3月期间接受生物制剂治疗的哮喘患者。使用0 - 10级视觉模拟量表评估插入痛、注射痛和因注射相关疼痛引起的治疗厌恶。评估临床因素、疼痛评分和治疗厌恶评分与注射部位局部压力和冷却效果之间的关系。以接受替西帕肽治疗的糖尿病患者为对照组。结果:共分析了122例生物治疗组和27例替西肽治疗组患者的反应。生物制剂的插入和注射疼痛平均评分分别为3.00±2.60和3.28±2.91。调整后的疼痛评分在生物制剂和替西肽之间没有显著差异。插入疼痛与焦虑和手臂注射有关,而注射疼痛与年轻和女性有关。插入和注射疼痛均与对数转换治疗厌恶评分存在独立关联(非标准化回归系数[B] = 0.08, 95% CI, 0.03-0.12, B = 0.07, 95% CI, 0.03-0.11)。注射部位冷却可显著减轻两种疼痛。结论:在接受生物制剂治疗哮喘的患者中,注射相关性疼痛是常见的,并且与治疗厌恶独立相关。局部冷却可以提供一种简单的方法来减少注射相关的疼痛和解决治疗厌恶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
9.60%
发文量
683
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases. This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders. The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书