{"title":"Biologic Injection-Related Pain in Severe Asthma, Its Impact on Treatment Aversion, and Pain-Relief Approach: A Multicenter Observational Study.","authors":"Takeshi Matsumoto, Megumi Aizawa-Abe, Naoki Yamamoto, Akiko Iri, Takahiro Fujiki, Yusuke Kusakabe, Emi Nakayama, Mayuko Tashima, Chikara Ito, Kodai Miyamoto, Reina Kitagawa, Yusei Fukushima, Akihiro Noda, Masanori Azuma, Tetsuya Ueda, Kensaku Aihara","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2026.09.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although biologic therapies are essential for managing severe asthma, injection-related pain may be a frequently overlooked barrier to treatment persistence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify biologic injection-related pain in asthma cases, identify clinical factors associated with such pain and treatment aversion, and explore practical pain-relief approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter observational study enrolled patients with asthma receiving biologics between May 2025 and March 2026. Insertion pain, injection pain, and treatment aversion attributable to injection-related pain were assessed using 0 to 10 visual analog scales. Associations between clinical factors, pain scores, and treatment aversion scores and the effects of local pressure and cooling at the injection site were evaluated. Patients with diabetes mellitus receiving tirzepatide served as a reference group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 122 biologic-treated and 27 tirzepatide-treated patient responses were analyzed. Mean insertion and injection pain scores for biologics were 3.00 ± 2.60 and 3.28 ± 2.91, respectively. Adjusted pain scores did not differ significantly across biologics and tirzepatide. Insertion pain was associated with anxiety and arm injection, whereas injection pain was associated with younger age and female sex. Both insertion and injection pain showed independent associations with log-transformed treatment aversion score (unstandardized regression coefficient [B] = 0.08, 95% CI, 0.03-0.12, and B = 0.07, 95% CI, 0.03-0.11, respectively). Injection-site cooling significantly reduced both pain types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients receiving biologics for asthma, injection-related pain is common and independently associated with treatment aversion. Local cooling may offer a simple approach to reducing injection-related pain and addressing treatment aversion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2026.09.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although biologic therapies are essential for managing severe asthma, injection-related pain may be a frequently overlooked barrier to treatment persistence.
Objective: To quantify biologic injection-related pain in asthma cases, identify clinical factors associated with such pain and treatment aversion, and explore practical pain-relief approaches.
Methods: This multicenter observational study enrolled patients with asthma receiving biologics between May 2025 and March 2026. Insertion pain, injection pain, and treatment aversion attributable to injection-related pain were assessed using 0 to 10 visual analog scales. Associations between clinical factors, pain scores, and treatment aversion scores and the effects of local pressure and cooling at the injection site were evaluated. Patients with diabetes mellitus receiving tirzepatide served as a reference group.
Results: In total, 122 biologic-treated and 27 tirzepatide-treated patient responses were analyzed. Mean insertion and injection pain scores for biologics were 3.00 ± 2.60 and 3.28 ± 2.91, respectively. Adjusted pain scores did not differ significantly across biologics and tirzepatide. Insertion pain was associated with anxiety and arm injection, whereas injection pain was associated with younger age and female sex. Both insertion and injection pain showed independent associations with log-transformed treatment aversion score (unstandardized regression coefficient [B] = 0.08, 95% CI, 0.03-0.12, and B = 0.07, 95% CI, 0.03-0.11, respectively). Injection-site cooling significantly reduced both pain types.
Conclusions: Among patients receiving biologics for asthma, injection-related pain is common and independently associated with treatment aversion. Local cooling may offer a simple approach to reducing injection-related pain and addressing treatment aversion.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.