Teaching Social Inequities in Canadian Occupational Therapy: Tensions and Strategies for an 'Embedded Sociologist'.

IF 2.4 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Brenda L Beagan
{"title":"Teaching Social Inequities in Canadian Occupational Therapy: Tensions and Strategies for an 'Embedded Sociologist'.","authors":"Brenda L Beagan","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2026.2741234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health professions education increasingly addresses social inequities, cultivating student awareness of structured power relations. Yet such teaching is met with resistance, with students prioritizing \"hard\" sciences and demanding immediate relevance and clinical application for everything taught. Sociological teaching and pedagogies are too often dismissed as \"fluffy\" and \"wasting time.\" In Canada, professional competencies in occupational therapy now require practitioners to engage in anti-oppressive practice, which means education programs need to teach those skills. This article employs an autoethnographic approach to critically reflect on 25 years of teaching about social inequities in occupational therapy. Four challenges arise: 1. Epistemological dissonance, with objectivity and individualism deeply unsettled by sociological thinking; 2. Insistence on immediate relevance and application, which can lead to a problematic reliance on first-voices guests; 3. Simultaneous privilege and absence-of-privilege in the classroom, alongside a \"charitable model\" rescuing stance; and 4. The importance of emotion in learning difficult topics. A pedagogy of discomfort invites learners to stay present to the unsettling emotions that may arise as they confront systemic social power relations. This means moving away from notions of \"safe\" classrooms toward emphasizing courage in the face of complex feelings. Helplessness and powerlessness may be countered through cultivating critical hope, as a necessary step toward social change.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2026.2741234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health professions education increasingly addresses social inequities, cultivating student awareness of structured power relations. Yet such teaching is met with resistance, with students prioritizing "hard" sciences and demanding immediate relevance and clinical application for everything taught. Sociological teaching and pedagogies are too often dismissed as "fluffy" and "wasting time." In Canada, professional competencies in occupational therapy now require practitioners to engage in anti-oppressive practice, which means education programs need to teach those skills. This article employs an autoethnographic approach to critically reflect on 25 years of teaching about social inequities in occupational therapy. Four challenges arise: 1. Epistemological dissonance, with objectivity and individualism deeply unsettled by sociological thinking; 2. Insistence on immediate relevance and application, which can lead to a problematic reliance on first-voices guests; 3. Simultaneous privilege and absence-of-privilege in the classroom, alongside a "charitable model" rescuing stance; and 4. The importance of emotion in learning difficult topics. A pedagogy of discomfort invites learners to stay present to the unsettling emotions that may arise as they confront systemic social power relations. This means moving away from notions of "safe" classrooms toward emphasizing courage in the face of complex feelings. Helplessness and powerlessness may be countered through cultivating critical hope, as a necessary step toward social change.

加拿大职业治疗中的社会不平等教学:“嵌入式社会学家”的紧张和策略。
卫生专业教育越来越多地涉及社会不平等,培养学生对结构性权力关系的认识。然而,这样的教学遇到了阻力,学生们优先考虑“硬”科学,要求所教的一切都具有直接的相关性和临床应用。社会学教学和教育学常常被认为是“空泛的”和“浪费时间的”。在加拿大,职业治疗的专业能力现在要求从业者从事反压迫实践,这意味着教育项目需要教授这些技能。这篇文章采用了一种自我民族志的方法来批判性地反思25年来关于职业治疗中社会不平等的教学。出现了四个挑战:1。认识论上的不协调,客观性和个人主义深受社会学思想的困扰;2. 坚持即时相关性和应用,这可能导致依赖第一声音的客人;3. 在课堂上同时存在着特权和不特权,以及一种“慈善模式”的拯救立场;和4。情感在学习困难话题中的重要性。一种不舒服的教学法会让学习者在面对系统的社会权力关系时,面对可能出现的不安情绪。这意味着从“安全”教室的概念转向强调面对复杂情感时的勇气。无助感和无力感可以通过培养批判性希望来克服,这是走向社会变革的必要步骤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Teaching and Learning in Medicine
Teaching and Learning in Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书