{"title":"Teaching Social Inequities in Canadian Occupational Therapy: Tensions and Strategies for an 'Embedded Sociologist'.","authors":"Brenda L Beagan","doi":"10.1080/10401334.2026.2741234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health professions education increasingly addresses social inequities, cultivating student awareness of structured power relations. Yet such teaching is met with resistance, with students prioritizing \"hard\" sciences and demanding immediate relevance and clinical application for everything taught. Sociological teaching and pedagogies are too often dismissed as \"fluffy\" and \"wasting time.\" In Canada, professional competencies in occupational therapy now require practitioners to engage in anti-oppressive practice, which means education programs need to teach those skills. This article employs an autoethnographic approach to critically reflect on 25 years of teaching about social inequities in occupational therapy. Four challenges arise: 1. Epistemological dissonance, with objectivity and individualism deeply unsettled by sociological thinking; 2. Insistence on immediate relevance and application, which can lead to a problematic reliance on first-voices guests; 3. Simultaneous privilege and absence-of-privilege in the classroom, alongside a \"charitable model\" rescuing stance; and 4. The importance of emotion in learning difficult topics. A pedagogy of discomfort invites learners to stay present to the unsettling emotions that may arise as they confront systemic social power relations. This means moving away from notions of \"safe\" classrooms toward emphasizing courage in the face of complex feelings. Helplessness and powerlessness may be countered through cultivating critical hope, as a necessary step toward social change.</p>","PeriodicalId":51183,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2026.2741234","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Health professions education increasingly addresses social inequities, cultivating student awareness of structured power relations. Yet such teaching is met with resistance, with students prioritizing "hard" sciences and demanding immediate relevance and clinical application for everything taught. Sociological teaching and pedagogies are too often dismissed as "fluffy" and "wasting time." In Canada, professional competencies in occupational therapy now require practitioners to engage in anti-oppressive practice, which means education programs need to teach those skills. This article employs an autoethnographic approach to critically reflect on 25 years of teaching about social inequities in occupational therapy. Four challenges arise: 1. Epistemological dissonance, with objectivity and individualism deeply unsettled by sociological thinking; 2. Insistence on immediate relevance and application, which can lead to a problematic reliance on first-voices guests; 3. Simultaneous privilege and absence-of-privilege in the classroom, alongside a "charitable model" rescuing stance; and 4. The importance of emotion in learning difficult topics. A pedagogy of discomfort invites learners to stay present to the unsettling emotions that may arise as they confront systemic social power relations. This means moving away from notions of "safe" classrooms toward emphasizing courage in the face of complex feelings. Helplessness and powerlessness may be countered through cultivating critical hope, as a necessary step toward social change.
期刊介绍:
Teaching and Learning in Medicine ( TLM) is an international, forum for scholarship on teaching and learning in the health professions. Its international scope reflects the common challenge faced by all medical educators: fostering the development of capable, well-rounded, and continuous learners prepared to practice in a complex, high-stakes, and ever-changing clinical environment. TLM''s contributors and readership comprise behavioral scientists and health care practitioners, signaling the value of integrating diverse perspectives into a comprehensive understanding of learning and performance. The journal seeks to provide the theoretical foundations and practical analysis needed for effective educational decision making in such areas as admissions, instructional design and delivery, performance assessment, remediation, technology-assisted instruction, diversity management, and faculty development, among others. TLM''s scope includes all levels of medical education, from premedical to postgraduate and continuing medical education, with articles published in the following categories: