Automated Quantification of 3-D Carotid Ultrasound Vessel Wall Texture Change Predicts Vascular Events.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Zhaozheng Chen, Bernard Chiu
{"title":"Automated Quantification of 3-D Carotid Ultrasound Vessel Wall Texture Change Predicts Vascular Events.","authors":"Zhaozheng Chen, Bernard Chiu","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To reduce reliance on labor-intensive and operator-dependent explicit plaque segmentation, we evaluated whether a texture-change score (ΔTexture) derived from semi-automated 3-D ultrasound (3-DUS) vessel wall segmentation predicts vascular events better than baseline vessel wall texture (BL-Texture), vessel wall volume change (ΔVWV) and Framingham risk score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>3-DUS images were acquired from 272 patients with carotid atherosclerosis at baseline and 1 y later. Vessel walls were delineated using a validated, minimally user-initialized segmentation workflow. Longitudinal texture change was summarized as vessel wall ΔTexture and compared with BL-Texture, ΔVWV and Framingham risk score. Patients were followed for up to 5 y (median, 3.16 y) for myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack and stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ΔTexture and BL-Texture predicted vascular events (log-rank, p < 0.001 for both), whereas ΔVWV did not. No event occurred in the lowest-risk tertile of ΔTexture. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ΔTexture was 0.89, compared with 0.82 for BL-Texture, 0.53 for ΔVWV and 0.53 for Framingham risk score. In Cox regression, ΔTexture (median hazard ratio, 4.05; p < 0.001) and BL-Texture (median hazard ratio, 3.63; p < 0.001) were significant predictors, whereas ΔVWV and Framingham risk score were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vessel wall ΔTexture derived from minimally user-initialized 3-DUS vessel wall segmentation predicted vascular events better than ΔVWV and Framingham risk score. This approach provides a scalable imaging biomarker for vascular event risk assessment without requiring explicit plaque segmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.09.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To reduce reliance on labor-intensive and operator-dependent explicit plaque segmentation, we evaluated whether a texture-change score (ΔTexture) derived from semi-automated 3-D ultrasound (3-DUS) vessel wall segmentation predicts vascular events better than baseline vessel wall texture (BL-Texture), vessel wall volume change (ΔVWV) and Framingham risk score.

Methods: 3-DUS images were acquired from 272 patients with carotid atherosclerosis at baseline and 1 y later. Vessel walls were delineated using a validated, minimally user-initialized segmentation workflow. Longitudinal texture change was summarized as vessel wall ΔTexture and compared with BL-Texture, ΔVWV and Framingham risk score. Patients were followed for up to 5 y (median, 3.16 y) for myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack and stroke.

Results: ΔTexture and BL-Texture predicted vascular events (log-rank, p < 0.001 for both), whereas ΔVWV did not. No event occurred in the lowest-risk tertile of ΔTexture. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ΔTexture was 0.89, compared with 0.82 for BL-Texture, 0.53 for ΔVWV and 0.53 for Framingham risk score. In Cox regression, ΔTexture (median hazard ratio, 4.05; p < 0.001) and BL-Texture (median hazard ratio, 3.63; p < 0.001) were significant predictors, whereas ΔVWV and Framingham risk score were not.

Conclusion: Vessel wall ΔTexture derived from minimally user-initialized 3-DUS vessel wall segmentation predicted vascular events better than ΔVWV and Framingham risk score. This approach provides a scalable imaging biomarker for vascular event risk assessment without requiring explicit plaque segmentation.

三维颈动脉超声血管壁纹理变化自动量化预测血管事件。
目的:为了减少对劳动密集型和依赖于操作人员的明确斑块分割的依赖,我们评估了由半自动3-D超声(3-DUS)血管壁分割得出的纹理变化评分(ΔTexture)是否比基线血管壁纹理(BL-Texture)、血管壁体积变化(ΔVWV)和Framingham风险评分更好地预测血管事件。方法:对272例颈动脉粥样硬化患者在基线和1年后的3-DUS图像进行分析。使用经过验证的、最少用户初始化的分割工作流程来描绘血管壁。纵向纹理变化总结为血管壁ΔTexture,并与BL-Texture、ΔVWV和Framingham风险评分进行比较。对心肌梗死、短暂性脑缺血发作和脑卒中患者的随访时间长达5年(中位数3.16年)。结果:ΔTexture和BL-Texture预测血管事件(两者的log-rank, p < 0.001),而ΔVWV没有。最低风险样本ΔTexture中未发生任何事件。ΔTexture的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.89,而BL-Texture为0.82,ΔVWV为0.53,Framingham风险评分为0.53。在Cox回归中,ΔTexture(中位风险比,4.05;p < 0.001)和BL-Texture(中位风险比,3.63;p < 0.001)是显著的预测因子,而ΔVWV和Framingham风险评分没有显著的预测因子。结论:最小用户初始化3-DUS血管壁分割得到的血管壁ΔTexture比ΔVWV和Framingham风险评分更能预测血管事件。该方法为血管事件风险评估提供了一种可扩展的成像生物标志物,无需明确的斑块分割。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书