Deep Learning-Enabled Automated B-mode Segmentation for Regional Cerebral Perfusion Assessment in Neonates Using Ultrafast Power Doppler.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ACOUSTICS
Nikan Fakhari, Alison Howell, Kie Honjo, Luc Mertens, Elise Langouet, Minh Nguyen, Axel Nael, Mike Seed, Olivier Villemain, Jerome Baranger
{"title":"Deep Learning-Enabled Automated B-mode Segmentation for Regional Cerebral Perfusion Assessment in Neonates Using Ultrafast Power Doppler.","authors":"Nikan Fakhari, Alison Howell, Kie Honjo, Luc Mertens, Elise Langouet, Minh Nguyen, Axel Nael, Mike Seed, Olivier Villemain, Jerome Baranger","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebral perfusion disturbances contribute to neonatal brain injury, and ultrafast power Doppler can quantify regional cerebral blood volume but relies on manual segmentation that limits clinical use. We developed and validated a U-Net model for automated regional brain segmentation on B-mode images derived from neonatal transfontanellar ultrafast ultrasound to enable rapid arterial and venous cerebral blood volume quantification. Time-integrated, log-compressed ultrafast B-mode images from 80 neonates were manually segmented by an expert into the cortico-sub-cortical areas, the cingulate gyrus and the basal ganglia, and then used to train a U-Net with class-weighted loss (a 70/15/15 train/validation/test split). The trained model was then applied to segment B-mode images, with the resulting regions of interest used to quantify arterial and venous cerebral blood volume from the corresponding power Doppler data. Segmentation performance was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient, with agreement between artificial intelligence- and manually derived cerebral blood volume assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The median Dice similarity coefficients were 83%, 84% and 88% for the three regions. Mean Bland-Altman differences were ≤0.103 dB (arterial) and ≤0.096 dB (venous). Perturbation of the predicted masks by ±35% surface area change showed the narrowest limits of agreement at the unperturbed prediction, changing by no more than 0.1 dB between -5% and +5%, demonstrating automated segmentation as a rapid, reproducible alternative to manual delineation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49399,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2026.09.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cerebral perfusion disturbances contribute to neonatal brain injury, and ultrafast power Doppler can quantify regional cerebral blood volume but relies on manual segmentation that limits clinical use. We developed and validated a U-Net model for automated regional brain segmentation on B-mode images derived from neonatal transfontanellar ultrafast ultrasound to enable rapid arterial and venous cerebral blood volume quantification. Time-integrated, log-compressed ultrafast B-mode images from 80 neonates were manually segmented by an expert into the cortico-sub-cortical areas, the cingulate gyrus and the basal ganglia, and then used to train a U-Net with class-weighted loss (a 70/15/15 train/validation/test split). The trained model was then applied to segment B-mode images, with the resulting regions of interest used to quantify arterial and venous cerebral blood volume from the corresponding power Doppler data. Segmentation performance was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient, with agreement between artificial intelligence- and manually derived cerebral blood volume assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The median Dice similarity coefficients were 83%, 84% and 88% for the three regions. Mean Bland-Altman differences were ≤0.103 dB (arterial) and ≤0.096 dB (venous). Perturbation of the predicted masks by ±35% surface area change showed the narrowest limits of agreement at the unperturbed prediction, changing by no more than 0.1 dB between -5% and +5%, demonstrating automated segmentation as a rapid, reproducible alternative to manual delineation.

基于超快功率多普勒的新生儿脑血流灌注深度学习自动b模式分割
脑灌注紊乱会导致新生儿脑损伤,超快功率多普勒可以量化局部脑血容量,但依赖于人工分割,限制了临床应用。我们开发并验证了一个U-Net模型,用于对新生儿经囟门超快超声获得的b型图像进行自动脑区域分割,以实现快速的动脉和静脉脑血容量量化。来自80名新生儿的时间集成、日志压缩的超快b模式图像由专家手动分割为皮质-皮质下区域、扣带回和基底神经节,然后用于训练具有类别加权损失的U-Net(70/15/15训练/验证/测试分割)。然后将训练好的模型应用于b段图像,通过相应的功率多普勒数据,将产生的感兴趣区域用于量化脑动脉和静脉血容量。使用Dice相似系数量化分割性能,通过Bland-Altman分析评估人工智能和人工提取的脑血容量之间的一致性。三个区域的骰子相似系数中位数分别为83%、84%和88%。平均Bland-Altman差异≤0.103 dB(动脉)和≤0.096 dB(静脉)。预测掩模受到±35%的表面面积变化的扰动,在无扰动预测中显示出最窄的一致性限制,在-5%和+5%之间变化不超过0.1 dB,表明自动分割是人工划定的快速,可重复的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.90%
发文量
325
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology is the official journal of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. The journal publishes original contributions that demonstrate a novel application of an existing ultrasound technology in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, new and improved clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and the interactions between ultrasound and biological systems, including bioeffects. Papers that simply utilize standard diagnostic ultrasound as a measuring tool will be considered out of scope. Extended critical reviews of subjects of contemporary interest in the field are also published, in addition to occasional editorial articles, clinical and technical notes, book reviews, letters to the editor and a calendar of forthcoming meetings. It is the aim of the journal fully to meet the information and publication requirements of the clinicians, scientists, engineers and other professionals who constitute the biomedical ultrasonic community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书