[Home(s) inside and out-Artistic self-representations by psychiatric inpatients around 1900].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
T Röske, L Kluge, S Stewner, M Rotzoll
{"title":"[Home(s) inside and out-Artistic self-representations by psychiatric inpatients around 1900].","authors":"T Röske, L Kluge, S Stewner, M Rotzoll","doi":"10.1007/s00115-026-02016-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Around 1900, what did \"home\" mean to people who, marginalized from the rest of civil society, were permanently confined within psychiatric institutions? Where did they feel they belonged (emotionally); did memories of family, landscape and politically defined territories dominate or was it the appropriation of the institutional space? An exploration of the Heidelberg Prinzhorn Collection, a collection unique in the world, provides a multifaceted answer to these questions. The historical collection contains paintings, drawings, texts, sculptures and musical compositions by psychiatric patients from institutions in German-speaking countries dating from around 1840 to the Nazi era.An interdisciplinary research project at the intersection of art history and the history of psychiatry, based at the Heidelberg Special Research Field (SFB) 1671 \"Home(s). Phenomena-Practices-Representations\", aims to re-examine the phenomenon of institutional psychiatry from its subjective, emotional perspective by focusing on \"Home(s)\" or \"Heimat(en)\". Based on the works and other sources it explores the motives of patient artists in the context of (the search for) affiliation, taking as its starting point the situation of exclusion from conventional \"homely\" connections. The examination of their artistic strategies is also conducted on the assumption that it will enable statements to be made about notions of home and affiliation within the \"matrix\" of mainstream society from which the patient-artists originated. This essay presents the initial findings based on three examples of different historical approaches to the subject.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-026-02016-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Around 1900, what did "home" mean to people who, marginalized from the rest of civil society, were permanently confined within psychiatric institutions? Where did they feel they belonged (emotionally); did memories of family, landscape and politically defined territories dominate or was it the appropriation of the institutional space? An exploration of the Heidelberg Prinzhorn Collection, a collection unique in the world, provides a multifaceted answer to these questions. The historical collection contains paintings, drawings, texts, sculptures and musical compositions by psychiatric patients from institutions in German-speaking countries dating from around 1840 to the Nazi era.An interdisciplinary research project at the intersection of art history and the history of psychiatry, based at the Heidelberg Special Research Field (SFB) 1671 "Home(s). Phenomena-Practices-Representations", aims to re-examine the phenomenon of institutional psychiatry from its subjective, emotional perspective by focusing on "Home(s)" or "Heimat(en)". Based on the works and other sources it explores the motives of patient artists in the context of (the search for) affiliation, taking as its starting point the situation of exclusion from conventional "homely" connections. The examination of their artistic strategies is also conducted on the assumption that it will enable statements to be made about notions of home and affiliation within the "matrix" of mainstream society from which the patient-artists originated. This essay presents the initial findings based on three examples of different historical approaches to the subject.

【家内外——1900年前后精神科住院病人的艺术自我表现】。
1900年前后,“家”对那些被公民社会边缘化、被永久关在精神病院的人来说意味着什么?他们感觉自己属于哪里(情感上);是对家庭、景观和政治上界定的领土的记忆占据了主导地位,还是对机构空间的占用?探索海德堡普林斯霍恩收藏,一个世界上独一无二的收藏,为这些问题提供了一个多方面的答案。历史收藏品包括绘画、素描、文本、雕塑和音乐作品,这些作品是由德语国家机构的精神病患者创作的,时间可追溯到1840年左右至纳粹时代。艺术史和精神病学历史交叉的跨学科研究项目,基于海德堡特别研究领域(SFB) 1671“家”。“现象-实践-表征”,旨在通过关注“家”或“海玛特”,从主观、情感的角度重新审视机构精神病学现象。以作品和其他资料为基础,探讨耐心艺术家在(寻找)从属关系的背景下的动机,以排除传统“家庭”联系的情况为出发点。对他们的艺术策略的考察也基于这样的假设,即它将使他们能够在主流社会的“母体”中对家庭和隶属关系的概念做出陈述,而病人艺术家就是从这个“母体”中产生的。本文介绍了基于三个不同的历史方法的例子的初步发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书