Acknowledging Advances, Addressing Gaps: Commentary on the Revised AGPA Clinical Practice Guidelines.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Jill D Paquin
{"title":"Acknowledging Advances, Addressing Gaps: Commentary on the Revised AGPA Clinical Practice Guidelines.","authors":"Jill D Paquin","doi":"10.1080/00207284.2026.2733229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review evaluates the second edition of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Group Psychotherapy (American Group Psychotherapy Association, 2025), the first major revision since 2008. The scope of this undertaking-expanding from 10 sections to 11 chapters, integrating a substantially grown evidence base, and addressing transformations in how group treatment is delivered-is formidable, and the authors' commitment to this work deserves genuine recognition. The update substantially reconceptualizes six chapters, integrates multicultural and social justice content throughout, and adds a new chapter on online group therapy. The incorporation of the multicultural orientation framework and attention to how historically marginalized clients experience group treatment represent genuine advances. However, the integration of diversity, equity, and inclusion content proceeds without fully interrogating the foundational frameworks and evidence bases that remain largely unchanged-risking absorption rather than inclusion. The guidelines do not acknowledge that the underlying research base was generated predominantly with WEIRD populations, nor do they consistently distinguish empirically supported recommendations from clinical consensus. Greater transparency about where guidance runs ahead of the evidence, particularly in multicultural practice, would strengthen both the document's integrity and its pedagogical value. These limitations reflect challenges facing the field as a whole.</p>","PeriodicalId":46441,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Group Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Group Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207284.2026.2733229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review evaluates the second edition of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Group Psychotherapy (American Group Psychotherapy Association, 2025), the first major revision since 2008. The scope of this undertaking-expanding from 10 sections to 11 chapters, integrating a substantially grown evidence base, and addressing transformations in how group treatment is delivered-is formidable, and the authors' commitment to this work deserves genuine recognition. The update substantially reconceptualizes six chapters, integrates multicultural and social justice content throughout, and adds a new chapter on online group therapy. The incorporation of the multicultural orientation framework and attention to how historically marginalized clients experience group treatment represent genuine advances. However, the integration of diversity, equity, and inclusion content proceeds without fully interrogating the foundational frameworks and evidence bases that remain largely unchanged-risking absorption rather than inclusion. The guidelines do not acknowledge that the underlying research base was generated predominantly with WEIRD populations, nor do they consistently distinguish empirically supported recommendations from clinical consensus. Greater transparency about where guidance runs ahead of the evidence, particularly in multicultural practice, would strengthen both the document's integrity and its pedagogical value. These limitations reflect challenges facing the field as a whole.

承认进步,解决差距:对修订的AGPA临床实践指南的评论。
本综述评估了第二版《团体心理治疗临床实践指南》(美国团体心理治疗协会,2025年),这是自2008年以来的第一次重大修订。这项工作的范围从10节扩展到11章,整合了大量增长的证据基础,并解决了如何提供群体治疗的转变,这是令人敬畏的,作者对这项工作的承诺值得真正的认可。这次更新基本上重新定义了六个章节,整合了多元文化和社会正义的内容,并增加了一个关于在线团体治疗的新章节。多元文化取向框架的结合和对历史上被边缘化的客户如何经历群体治疗的关注代表着真正的进步。然而,多样性、公平性和包容性内容的整合在没有充分质疑基本框架和证据基础的情况下进行,这些框架和证据基础在很大程度上保持不变,这可能会导致吸收而不是包容的风险。该指南没有承认潜在的研究基础主要是在WEIRD人群中产生的,也没有始终将经验支持的建议与临床共识区分开来。提高指导在证据之前的透明度,特别是在多元文化实践中,将加强文件的完整性及其教学价值。这些限制反映了整个领域面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Recognized as the leading source of information on group therapy theory, practice, and research, this journal features contributions from foremost experts in the field. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy offers: - Clinical articles on group treatment models, process issues, and techniques - Research reviews that keep practitioners up to date - Thought-provoking essays in the Reader"s Forum and Commentary sections - Reviews of current books and video releases - Special issues on such topics as evidence-based practice and ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书