Outcomes of Screening Colonoscopy in Older Adults: A Large Propensity-Matched Real-World Cohort Study

IF 1.6 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
JGH Open Pub Date : 2026-10-04 DOI:10.1002/jgh3.70479
Taha Shakarchi, Muneeb Khawar, Mohammad Azeem Malik, Anuhya Jamandlamudi, Ihsan Noushad Karuppan Veettil, Aqsa Komel, Mirza Muhammad Hadeed Khawar, Naima Agha, Muhammad Habib, Ishtiaq Ahmad, Ban Al-Abayechi, Ahmed Al-Khazraji
{"title":"Outcomes of Screening Colonoscopy in Older Adults: A Large Propensity-Matched Real-World Cohort Study","authors":"Taha Shakarchi,&nbsp;Muneeb Khawar,&nbsp;Mohammad Azeem Malik,&nbsp;Anuhya Jamandlamudi,&nbsp;Ihsan Noushad Karuppan Veettil,&nbsp;Aqsa Komel,&nbsp;Mirza Muhammad Hadeed Khawar,&nbsp;Naima Agha,&nbsp;Muhammad Habib,&nbsp;Ishtiaq Ahmad,&nbsp;Ban Al-Abayechi,&nbsp;Ahmed Al-Khazraji","doi":"10.1002/jgh3.70479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The benefits and harms of screening colonoscopy after age 75 remain uncertain. Guidelines endorse individualized decisions given competing risks, but comparative data are limited.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, adults aged 75–90 years with a colorectal cancer screening encounter were matched 1:1 by colonoscopy within 3 months. Outcomes were assessed at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years. Sensitivity analyses excluded pre-index anemia and, separately, fecal abnormalities and alarm symptoms; subsequent colonoscopy was counted through 5 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Matched cohorts comprised 58 315 pairs at 30 days, 61 497 at 1 year, and 69 821 at 5 years. Colonoscopy increased polyp detection (HR 4.43 [95% CI 4.15–4.73] at 30 days; 1.88 [1.82–1.95] at 5 years) and colorectal cancer detection (4.56 [3.62–5.74]; 1.78 [1.59–1.98]; all <i>p</i> ≤ 0.003). Five-year all-cause mortality was unchanged (HR 1.01 [0.97–1.05]; <i>p</i> = 0.741). Perforation rose at 5 years (HR 1.29 [1.02–1.63]; <i>p</i> = 0.033); gastrointestinal bleeding fell at 1 year (HR 0.90 [0.84–0.97]; <i>p</i> = 0.004). After exclusion of pre-index anemia (70 399 pairs), 5-year HRs remained 1.72 for polyps and 1.52 for cancer. In an indication-restricted cohort also excluding fecal abnormalities, weight loss, abdominal pain, and change in bowel habit (54 300 pairs), the 5-year HRs were 1.59 and 1.32. Subsequent colonoscopy from day 31 to year 5 was not more frequent after index screening (5.8% vs. 6.2%; HR 0.93).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Screening colonoscopy improved polyp and cancer detection but did not reduce 5-year all-cause mortality. The late perforation signal was not explained by more subsequent or therapeutic colonoscopy. Decisions after age 75 should be individualized.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":45861,"journal":{"name":"JGH Open","volume":"10 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13635485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JGH Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgh3.70479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The benefits and harms of screening colonoscopy after age 75 remain uncertain. Guidelines endorse individualized decisions given competing risks, but comparative data are limited.

Methods

In the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, adults aged 75–90 years with a colorectal cancer screening encounter were matched 1:1 by colonoscopy within 3 months. Outcomes were assessed at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years. Sensitivity analyses excluded pre-index anemia and, separately, fecal abnormalities and alarm symptoms; subsequent colonoscopy was counted through 5 years.

Results

Matched cohorts comprised 58 315 pairs at 30 days, 61 497 at 1 year, and 69 821 at 5 years. Colonoscopy increased polyp detection (HR 4.43 [95% CI 4.15–4.73] at 30 days; 1.88 [1.82–1.95] at 5 years) and colorectal cancer detection (4.56 [3.62–5.74]; 1.78 [1.59–1.98]; all p ≤ 0.003). Five-year all-cause mortality was unchanged (HR 1.01 [0.97–1.05]; p = 0.741). Perforation rose at 5 years (HR 1.29 [1.02–1.63]; p = 0.033); gastrointestinal bleeding fell at 1 year (HR 0.90 [0.84–0.97]; p = 0.004). After exclusion of pre-index anemia (70 399 pairs), 5-year HRs remained 1.72 for polyps and 1.52 for cancer. In an indication-restricted cohort also excluding fecal abnormalities, weight loss, abdominal pain, and change in bowel habit (54 300 pairs), the 5-year HRs were 1.59 and 1.32. Subsequent colonoscopy from day 31 to year 5 was not more frequent after index screening (5.8% vs. 6.2%; HR 0.93).

Conclusion

Screening colonoscopy improved polyp and cancer detection but did not reduce 5-year all-cause mortality. The late perforation signal was not explained by more subsequent or therapeutic colonoscopy. Decisions after age 75 should be individualized.

老年人结肠镜筛查的结果:一项倾向匹配的现实世界队列研究。
背景:75岁以后结肠镜筛查的利弊仍不确定。指南支持基于竞争风险的个体化决策,但比较数据有限。方法:在TriNetX美国合作网络中,年龄在75-90岁的结直肠癌筛查遭遇的成年人在3个月内进行结肠镜检查,比例为1:1。结果在30天、1年和5年进行评估。敏感性分析排除了指数前贫血,并分别排除了粪便异常和警报症状;结肠镜随访5年。结果:匹配队列包括30天的58 315对,1年的61 497对,5年的69 821对。结肠镜检查增加息肉检出率(30天时HR 4.43 [95% CI 4.15-4.73]; 5年时HR 1.88[1.82-1.95])和结直肠癌检出率(4.56 [3.62-5.74];1.78 [1.59-1.98];p均≤0.003)。5年全因死亡率没有变化(HR 1.01 [0.97-1.05]; p = 0.741)。5年后穿孔率上升(HR 1.29 [1.02-1.63]; p = 0.033);1年后消化道出血下降(HR 0.90 [0.84-0.97]; p = 0.004)。排除指数前贫血(70399对)后,息肉和癌症的5年hr分别为1.72和1.52。在排除粪便异常、体重减轻、腹痛和排便习惯改变的适应症限制队列中(54 300对),5年hr分别为1.59和1.32。指数筛查后第31天至第5年的结肠镜检查次数没有增加(5.8% vs. 6.2%; HR 0.93)。结论:结肠镜筛查提高了息肉和癌症的检出率,但没有降低5年全因死亡率。晚期穿孔信号不能用后续或治疗性结肠镜检查来解释。75岁以后的决定应该个体化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JGH Open
JGH Open GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书