Artificial Intelligence in Telemedicine: philosophical, ethical, and epistemological dimensions of a transforming practice.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2026-09-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AE2371
Agnaldo Rodrigues da Costa, Carlos Henrique Sartorato Pedrotti, Tarso Augusto Duenhas Accorsi
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in Telemedicine: philosophical, ethical, and epistemological dimensions of a transforming practice.","authors":"Agnaldo Rodrigues da Costa, Carlos Henrique Sartorato Pedrotti, Tarso Augusto Duenhas Accorsi","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AE2371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has evolved from a contingency-based alternative into a structural pillar of healthcare delivery, increasingly being integrated with artificial intelligence. Algorithms for triage, clinical decision support, remote monitoring, and generative language models now actively participate in medical care. This integration is more than just functional; it reorganizes the foundational aspects of medicine-ontological, ethical, and epistemological-by redefining what qualifies as valid knowledge, who has legitimate authority, and how care is organized when an algorithmic agent facilitates the clinical interaction. This article critically examines the emergence of the patient-clinician-algorithm triad in telemedicine, and analyzes its implications for autonomy, informed consent, epistemic trust, privacy, justice, responsibility, and the phenomenology of care. It argues that the future of medicine will not be human or algorithmic but human-algorithmic, provided clinical judgment, explainability, and moral responsibility remain central.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"24 spe1","pages":"eAE2371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13689968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2026AE2371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine has evolved from a contingency-based alternative into a structural pillar of healthcare delivery, increasingly being integrated with artificial intelligence. Algorithms for triage, clinical decision support, remote monitoring, and generative language models now actively participate in medical care. This integration is more than just functional; it reorganizes the foundational aspects of medicine-ontological, ethical, and epistemological-by redefining what qualifies as valid knowledge, who has legitimate authority, and how care is organized when an algorithmic agent facilitates the clinical interaction. This article critically examines the emergence of the patient-clinician-algorithm triad in telemedicine, and analyzes its implications for autonomy, informed consent, epistemic trust, privacy, justice, responsibility, and the phenomenology of care. It argues that the future of medicine will not be human or algorithmic but human-algorithmic, provided clinical judgment, explainability, and moral responsibility remain central.

远程医疗中的人工智能:转型实践的哲学、伦理和认识论维度。
在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,远程医疗已经从基于应急的替代方案发展成为医疗保健服务的结构性支柱,并越来越多地与人工智能相结合。分诊算法、临床决策支持、远程监控和生成语言模型现在积极参与医疗保健。这种集成不仅仅是功能性的;它通过重新定义什么是有效的知识,谁有合法的权威,以及当算法代理促进临床互动时如何组织护理,重新组织了医学的基础方面——本体论、伦理学和认识论。本文批判性地考察了远程医疗中患者-临床医生-算法三位一体的出现,并分析了其对自主性、知情同意、认知信任、隐私、正义、责任和护理现象学的影响。它认为,医学的未来将不是人类或算法,而是人类算法,前提是临床判断、可解释性和道德责任仍然是核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书