{"title":"Fucking with the Psychoanalytic Ancestors: Epistemological Insubordination and Failed Fabulation as Queer Pedagogies in Psychoanalytic Training.","authors":"Harriet Mossop","doi":"10.1007/s10912-026-10067-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article responds to Paul B. Preciado's call for the 'depatriarchalization, deheterosexualization and decolonization' (2021, 76) of psychoanalysis by developing a method of epistemological insubordination for reading the psychoanalytic archive. Historic texts, still taught in contemporary trainings, mobilise powerful affective responses in trainees yet remain largely unexamined as transferential objects within training institutions. Situating psychoanalytic writing as a Derridean archive, I perform a queer phenomenological historiographic reading of Helene Deutsch's writings on female homosexuality for \"straight lines,\" \"straightening devices,\" and \"queer angles\", tracing shifts in psychoanalytic attitudes between 1930s Vienna and 1940s Boston. I then extend this method by working with my own fabulative responses to these difficult texts, developing a technique of failed fabulation that mobilises the rigid, mythosymbolic structures of the ego through playfully fucking with the psychoanalytic ancestors. Finally, I consider how these methods might support pedagogy in psychoanalytic training courses, while attending to the unevenly distributed risks of this approach. The article contributes to debates within queer medical humanities about how clinical education can reckon with its colonial, cis-heteronormative legacies.</p>","PeriodicalId":45518,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Humanities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-026-10067-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article responds to Paul B. Preciado's call for the 'depatriarchalization, deheterosexualization and decolonization' (2021, 76) of psychoanalysis by developing a method of epistemological insubordination for reading the psychoanalytic archive. Historic texts, still taught in contemporary trainings, mobilise powerful affective responses in trainees yet remain largely unexamined as transferential objects within training institutions. Situating psychoanalytic writing as a Derridean archive, I perform a queer phenomenological historiographic reading of Helene Deutsch's writings on female homosexuality for "straight lines," "straightening devices," and "queer angles", tracing shifts in psychoanalytic attitudes between 1930s Vienna and 1940s Boston. I then extend this method by working with my own fabulative responses to these difficult texts, developing a technique of failed fabulation that mobilises the rigid, mythosymbolic structures of the ego through playfully fucking with the psychoanalytic ancestors. Finally, I consider how these methods might support pedagogy in psychoanalytic training courses, while attending to the unevenly distributed risks of this approach. The article contributes to debates within queer medical humanities about how clinical education can reckon with its colonial, cis-heteronormative legacies.
本文通过开发一种阅读精神分析档案的认识论反抗方法,回应了Paul B. Preciado对精神分析的“去父权制化、去异性化和去殖民化”(2021,76)的呼吁。在当代培训中仍然教授的历史文本,在受训者中调动了强大的情感反应,但在培训机构中作为转移对象,在很大程度上仍未得到检验。我将精神分析写作作为Derridean的档案,对Helene Deutsch关于女性同性恋的作品进行了酷儿现象学的历史解读,以“直线”、“矫直装置”和“酷儿角度”为主题,追踪精神分析态度在20世纪30年代维也纳和40年代波士顿之间的转变。然后,我扩展了这种方法,用我自己对这些难懂的文本的虚构反应,开发了一种失败的虚构技术,通过玩弄精神分析学的祖先,调动了自我僵化的神话象征结构。最后,我考虑这些方法如何支持精神分析培训课程的教学,同时注意这种方法的不均匀分布风险。这篇文章促成了酷儿医学人文学科内部关于临床教育如何处理其殖民、顺式异性恋传统的争论。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Humanities publishes original papers that reflect its enlarged focus on interdisciplinary inquiry in medicine and medical education. Such inquiry can emerge in the following ways: (1) from the medical humanities, which includes literature, history, philosophy, and bioethics as well as those areas of the social and behavioral sciences that have strong humanistic traditions; (2) from cultural studies, a multidisciplinary activity involving the humanities; women''s, African-American, and other critical studies; media studies and popular culture; and sociology and anthropology, which can be used to examine medical institutions, practice and education with a special focus on relations of power; and (3) from pedagogical perspectives that elucidate what and how knowledge is made and valued in medicine, how that knowledge is expressed and transmitted, and the ideological basis of medical education.