Staged multimodal correction of implant rippling after prepectoral breast reconstruction with thin mastectomy flaps: a case report.

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY
Case Reports in Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23320885.2026.2739821
Tony Kazzi, Suzanne Youness, Antoine Abi Abboud, Hady Rihani
{"title":"Staged multimodal correction of implant rippling after prepectoral breast reconstruction with thin mastectomy flaps: a case report.","authors":"Tony Kazzi, Suzanne Youness, Antoine Abi Abboud, Hady Rihani","doi":"10.1080/23320885.2026.2739821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rippling is a recognized aesthetic complication of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction, and thin mastectomy flaps markedly increase its risk. We report a 35-year-old physically active woman with recurrent bilateral fibroadenomas who underwent bilateral nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction; the prepectoral plane was chosen to avoid animation deformity, weighed against her thin flaps. Visible rippling attributable to thin soft-tissue coverage developed at three months. Autologous fat grafting gave only partial, temporary correction. Four months later, a single staged, combined procedure achieved definitive correction: bilateral exchange to highly cohesive silicone gel implants, conversion to a subpectoral pocket, Wise-pattern mastopexy, and adjunctive lipofilling, with a right local inferior-pedicle rotation flap correcting a medial contour defect. At 12 months, rippling had resolved with a satisfactory aesthetic outcome. Thin flaps were considered the principal contributing factor, although a single case cannot establish causation. Because prepectoral reconstruction relies on the soft-tissue envelope for implant camouflage, thin flaps may favor considering primary subpectoral or dual-plane placement, or planned soft-tissue support such as acellular dermal matrix or autologous coverage. Salvage addresses the determinants of rippling in combination: fat grafting to thicken tissue, pocket conversion to add muscular coverage, mastopexy to tighten the skin envelope, and exchange for a more cohesive implant, although simultaneous performance precludes isolating any single component's contribution. Thin mastectomy flaps appear to be an important risk factor, potentially informing patient selection. Once rippling occurs, a staged multimodal approach can restore contour.</p>","PeriodicalId":42421,"journal":{"name":"Case Reports in Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"13 1","pages":"2739821"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13629811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Reports in Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23320885.2026.2739821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rippling is a recognized aesthetic complication of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction, and thin mastectomy flaps markedly increase its risk. We report a 35-year-old physically active woman with recurrent bilateral fibroadenomas who underwent bilateral nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction; the prepectoral plane was chosen to avoid animation deformity, weighed against her thin flaps. Visible rippling attributable to thin soft-tissue coverage developed at three months. Autologous fat grafting gave only partial, temporary correction. Four months later, a single staged, combined procedure achieved definitive correction: bilateral exchange to highly cohesive silicone gel implants, conversion to a subpectoral pocket, Wise-pattern mastopexy, and adjunctive lipofilling, with a right local inferior-pedicle rotation flap correcting a medial contour defect. At 12 months, rippling had resolved with a satisfactory aesthetic outcome. Thin flaps were considered the principal contributing factor, although a single case cannot establish causation. Because prepectoral reconstruction relies on the soft-tissue envelope for implant camouflage, thin flaps may favor considering primary subpectoral or dual-plane placement, or planned soft-tissue support such as acellular dermal matrix or autologous coverage. Salvage addresses the determinants of rippling in combination: fat grafting to thicken tissue, pocket conversion to add muscular coverage, mastopexy to tighten the skin envelope, and exchange for a more cohesive implant, although simultaneous performance precludes isolating any single component's contribution. Thin mastectomy flaps appear to be an important risk factor, potentially informing patient selection. Once rippling occurs, a staged multimodal approach can restore contour.

分阶段多模式矫正乳房再造后植入物波纹薄乳房切除术皮瓣:1例报告。
波纹是乳房前假体乳房重建的一个公认的美学并发症,而薄的乳房切除术皮瓣明显增加其风险。我们报告了一位35岁的体力活动女性复发性双侧纤维腺瘤,她接受了双侧乳头保留皮下乳房切除术并立即乳房前植入物重建;前翼的选择是为了避免动画畸形,权衡她的薄襟翼。可见的波纹是由于薄的软组织覆盖在三个月发展。自体脂肪移植只给予部分、暂时的矫正。四个月后,单阶段联合手术获得了最终的矫正:双侧交换到高粘结性硅胶植入物,转换到胸下口袋,Wise-pattern乳房固定术,辅助脂肪填充,右局部蒂下旋转皮瓣矫正内侧轮廓缺损。在12个月的时间里,波纹已经解决了,审美效果令人满意。薄皮瓣被认为是主要的影响因素,尽管单个病例不能建立因果关系。由于胸前重建依赖于软组织包膜来伪装植入物,薄皮瓣可能更倾向于考虑初级胸下或双平面放置,或计划的软组织支持,如脱细胞真皮基质或自体覆盖。打捞解决了涟漪的决定因素组合:脂肪移植增厚组织,口袋转换增加肌肉覆盖,乳房切除术收紧皮肤包膜,交换更有凝聚力的植入物,尽管同时的性能排除了任何单一成分的贡献。薄的乳房切除术皮瓣似乎是一个重要的危险因素,可能会影响患者的选择。一旦发生波纹,分阶段多模态方法可以恢复轮廓。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书