Alternative lengthening of telomeres in small well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: independent validation and cross-platform concordance.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Ameya Patil, Raima Memon, Hallberra Gudmundsdottir, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Patricia Greipp, Sarah Jenkins, Julie Vrana, Karen Rech, Sameer Al Diffalha, Michelle D Reid, Daniela S Allende, Rondell P Graham
{"title":"Alternative lengthening of telomeres in small well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: independent validation and cross-platform concordance.","authors":"Ameya Patil, Raima Memon, Hallberra Gudmundsdottir, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Patricia Greipp, Sarah Jenkins, Julie Vrana, Karen Rech, Sameer Al Diffalha, Michelle D Reid, Daniela S Allende, Rondell P Graham","doi":"10.1007/s00428-026-04740-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors measuring ≤ 2 cm (small PanNETs) are usually non-functional and most are discovered incidentally. While most are indolent, some behave aggressively and metastasize. Alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) has shown promise as a predictive biomarker of recurrence in recent studies. We designed a multi-institutional study to validate the predictive ability of ALT in small PanNET to inform patient selection for operative versus non-operative management. We identified 172 cases of small PanNET diagnosed from 2001 to 2021 in four different institutions. ALT fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) could be performed in 133 cases and was compared with clinical outcomes. Among those with FISH, 44.4% were females with a mean age of 65.4 years (range 31-88). Twenty-one cases (15.8%) were ALT-positive. Over a median follow-up of 48 months, a total of 19 progressions (metastasis, recurrence, increase in size, or death) were recorded. ALT positivity was significantly associated with worse progression-free survival [PFS]. In the ALT-positive group, a total of 9 cases showed progression compared to 10 in the ALT-negative group (5-year PFS: 70.2% vs. 88.8%, hazard ratio: 4.69, p = 0.002). In a separate analysis using matched cases, ALT chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), demonstrated high concordance with ALT FISH (95.5% for positive and 91.7% for negative cases) enabling cross-platform validation. Unlike FISH, CISH can be interpreted using standard bright field microscopy, facilitating broader implementation. These findings support further evaluation of ALT testing, particularly via CISH, as a potentially scalable and accessible biomarker, while recognizing that formal analytic validation and confirmation in unselected cohorts are required before routine clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-026-04740-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors measuring ≤ 2 cm (small PanNETs) are usually non-functional and most are discovered incidentally. While most are indolent, some behave aggressively and metastasize. Alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) has shown promise as a predictive biomarker of recurrence in recent studies. We designed a multi-institutional study to validate the predictive ability of ALT in small PanNET to inform patient selection for operative versus non-operative management. We identified 172 cases of small PanNET diagnosed from 2001 to 2021 in four different institutions. ALT fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) could be performed in 133 cases and was compared with clinical outcomes. Among those with FISH, 44.4% were females with a mean age of 65.4 years (range 31-88). Twenty-one cases (15.8%) were ALT-positive. Over a median follow-up of 48 months, a total of 19 progressions (metastasis, recurrence, increase in size, or death) were recorded. ALT positivity was significantly associated with worse progression-free survival [PFS]. In the ALT-positive group, a total of 9 cases showed progression compared to 10 in the ALT-negative group (5-year PFS: 70.2% vs. 88.8%, hazard ratio: 4.69, p = 0.002). In a separate analysis using matched cases, ALT chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), demonstrated high concordance with ALT FISH (95.5% for positive and 91.7% for negative cases) enabling cross-platform validation. Unlike FISH, CISH can be interpreted using standard bright field microscopy, facilitating broader implementation. These findings support further evaluation of ALT testing, particularly via CISH, as a potentially scalable and accessible biomarker, while recognizing that formal analytic validation and confirmation in unselected cohorts are required before routine clinical implementation.

端粒在分化良好的胰腺神经内分泌小肿瘤中的选择性延长:独立验证和跨平台一致性。
大小≤2 cm的高分化胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(小PanNETs)通常是非功能性的,大多数是偶然发现的。虽然大多数是惰性的,但有些表现出侵略性并转移。在最近的研究中,端粒选择性延长(ALT)已显示出作为复发预测生物标志物的希望。我们设计了一项多机构研究来验证ALT在小PanNET中的预测能力,以告知患者选择手术还是非手术治疗。我们从2001年至2021年在四个不同的机构中发现了172例小型PanNET病例。对133例患者行ALT荧光原位杂交(FISH),并与临床结果进行比较。在FISH患者中,44.4%为女性,平均年龄65.4岁(31-88岁)。alt阳性21例(15.8%)。在中位48个月的随访中,共记录了19例进展(转移、复发、体积增大或死亡)。ALT阳性与较差的无进展生存期(PFS)显著相关。在alt阳性组中,共有9例出现进展,而alt阴性组为10例(5年PFS: 70.2%对88.8%,风险比:4.69,p = 0.002)。在使用匹配病例的单独分析中,ALT显色原位杂交(CISH)显示出与ALT FISH的高度一致性(阳性95.5%,阴性91.7%),可以进行跨平台验证。与FISH不同,CISH可以使用标准亮场显微镜进行解释,从而促进更广泛的实施。这些发现支持进一步评估ALT检测,特别是通过CISH,作为一种潜在的可扩展和可获得的生物标志物,同时认识到在常规临床实施之前,需要在未选择的队列中进行正式的分析验证和确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Virchows Archiv
Virchows Archiv 医学-病理学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书