Surveillance-Driven Machine Learning for Prediction of Antimicrobial Susceptibility: An Explainable Modeling Framework using the Pfizer ATLAS Dataset (2004 - 2023).

Q1 Medicine
Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2026-09-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.26477.2
Raphael Mutua, David Gichohi, Samuel K Ndegwa, Rahma O Golicha, Frida Njeru, Benson Kituku
{"title":"Surveillance-Driven Machine Learning for Prediction of Antimicrobial Susceptibility: An Explainable Modeling Framework using the Pfizer ATLAS Dataset (2004 - 2023).","authors":"Raphael Mutua, David Gichohi, Samuel K Ndegwa, Rahma O Golicha, Frida Njeru, Benson Kituku","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.26477.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global public health threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where delayed antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and limited diagnostic capacity complicate timely treatment and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Although large-scale surveillance programmes routinely collect antimicrobial susceptibility data, these datasets remain underutilised for predictive analytics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a surveillance-driven machine learning (ML) framework using isolate-level data from African sites participating in the Pfizer Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) programme between 2019 and 2023. Seven antibiotic-specific Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models were developed to predict antimicrobial susceptibility using routinely collected microbiological, demographic, clinical, and geographical metadata. Model development included structured data preprocessing, RandomOverSampler-based class balancing restricted to the training data, hyperparameter optimisation using stratified cross-validation, and evaluation on a held-out test dataset. A rule-based MIC interpretation system and interactive dashboard were developed to demonstrate implementation of the analytical workflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The antibiotic-specific models demonstrated moderate predictive performance, with test accuracies ranging from 57% to 76%. Ceftazidime-Avibactam achieved the highest test accuracy (76%), followed by Gentamicin (65%) and Imipenem (64%), while Amikacin showed the lowest performance (57%). Feature-importance analysis identified bacterial species as consistently among the most influential predictors. In contrast, bacterial family, country of isolate collection, specimen source, clinical specialty, and demographic characteristics contributed to varying degrees across antibiotics. Performance was generally stronger for the more frequently represented susceptible class than for intermediate and resistant isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Routinely collected AMR surveillance data can support antibiotic-specific ML predictions without requiring genomic sequencing or detailed patient-level clinical information. This study provides a proof-of-concept framework for surveillance-driven predictive analytics that could complement conventional AMR surveillance and AMS. External validation, calibration, prospective clinical evaluation, and implementation studies are required before routine deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"11 ","pages":"393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13624498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.26477.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing global public health threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where delayed antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and limited diagnostic capacity complicate timely treatment and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Although large-scale surveillance programmes routinely collect antimicrobial susceptibility data, these datasets remain underutilised for predictive analytics.

Methods: We developed a surveillance-driven machine learning (ML) framework using isolate-level data from African sites participating in the Pfizer Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) programme between 2019 and 2023. Seven antibiotic-specific Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models were developed to predict antimicrobial susceptibility using routinely collected microbiological, demographic, clinical, and geographical metadata. Model development included structured data preprocessing, RandomOverSampler-based class balancing restricted to the training data, hyperparameter optimisation using stratified cross-validation, and evaluation on a held-out test dataset. A rule-based MIC interpretation system and interactive dashboard were developed to demonstrate implementation of the analytical workflow.

Results: The antibiotic-specific models demonstrated moderate predictive performance, with test accuracies ranging from 57% to 76%. Ceftazidime-Avibactam achieved the highest test accuracy (76%), followed by Gentamicin (65%) and Imipenem (64%), while Amikacin showed the lowest performance (57%). Feature-importance analysis identified bacterial species as consistently among the most influential predictors. In contrast, bacterial family, country of isolate collection, specimen source, clinical specialty, and demographic characteristics contributed to varying degrees across antibiotics. Performance was generally stronger for the more frequently represented susceptible class than for intermediate and resistant isolates.

Conclusion: Routinely collected AMR surveillance data can support antibiotic-specific ML predictions without requiring genomic sequencing or detailed patient-level clinical information. This study provides a proof-of-concept framework for surveillance-driven predictive analytics that could complement conventional AMR surveillance and AMS. External validation, calibration, prospective clinical evaluation, and implementation studies are required before routine deployment.

监控驱动的机器学习预测抗菌素敏感性:使用辉瑞ATLAS数据集(2004 - 2023)的可解释建模框架。
背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是一个日益严重的全球公共卫生威胁,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),在这些国家,延迟的抗菌素药敏试验(AST)和有限的诊断能力使及时治疗和抗菌素管理(AMS)复杂化。尽管大规模监测规划定期收集抗菌药物敏感性数据,但这些数据集仍未充分用于预测分析。方法:我们开发了一个监测驱动的机器学习(ML)框架,使用2019年至2023年参与辉瑞抗菌素测试领导和监测(ATLAS)计划的非洲站点的孤立级数据。利用常规收集的微生物学、人口统计学、临床和地理数据,开发了7个抗生素特异性极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型来预测抗生素敏感性。模型开发包括结构化数据预处理,基于随机采样器的类平衡,限制在训练数据上,使用分层交叉验证的超参数优化,以及对持有测试数据集的评估。开发了基于规则的MIC解释系统和交互式仪表板来演示分析工作流的实现。结果:抗生素特异性模型表现出适度的预测性能,测试准确率在57%到76%之间。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦检测准确率最高(76%),庆大霉素次之(65%),亚胺培南次之(64%),阿米卡星检测准确率最低(57%)。特征重要性分析确定细菌种类是最具影响力的预测因素之一。相比之下,细菌科、分离物采集国家、标本来源、临床专科和人口统计学特征对抗生素的影响程度不同。通常情况下,较为常见的易感菌株比中间菌株和耐药菌株表现更强。结论:常规收集的AMR监测数据可以支持抗生素特异性ML预测,而不需要基因组测序或详细的患者水平临床信息。这项研究为监测驱动的预测分析提供了一个概念验证框架,可以补充传统的抗菌素耐药性监测和AMS。在常规部署之前,需要进行外部验证、校准、前瞻性临床评估和实施研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书