Patient Perspectives on Long-Acting Injectable Medications During Psychiatric Hospitalization.

Q4 Medicine
Tanya Alim, Allea Frazier, Michelle Brooks, Stephanie A Rolin
{"title":"Patient Perspectives on Long-Acting Injectable Medications During Psychiatric Hospitalization.","authors":"Tanya Alim, Allea Frazier, Michelle Brooks, Stephanie A Rolin","doi":"10.4088/PCC.26m04258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To characterize patient perspectives on long-acting injectable (LAI) medications among adult psychiatric inpatients.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> We conducted a prospective, observational pilot study of adult inpatients on a voluntary psychiatric unit at an urban safety-net hospital in Washington, DC. Patients were approached during hospitalization and completed a brief, structured worksheet assessing prior LAI exposure, perceived experience, and current treatment preferences. Data were collected from February 2025 to April 2025 and analyzed descriptively.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> A total of 30 patients participated (mean age of 46.8 years, 63% men, 87% Black). Most participants reported no prior LAI exposure (n=22, 73%). Among those with reported prior exposure (n=7, 23%), experiences were mixed: 2 reported that it was mostly helpful (29%), 2 reported that it was neutral (29%), and 2 reported that it was not helpful (29%). One person had not yet formed an opinion. Regarding current treatment preferences, a third stated that they preferred oral medications (n=10, 33%). Most reported that they would consider an LAI (n=10, 33%) or that they were unsure and wanted to discuss it further with their treatment team (n=8, 27%).</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> In this pilot sample, patient perspectives on LAI medications during psychiatric hospitalization were heterogeneous and characterized by substantial openness and uncertainty rather than fixed resistance. These findings suggest that inpatient settings may represent an opportunity for patient-centered discussion and shared decision-making regarding LAI treatment.</p><p><p><i>Prim Care Companion CNS Disord</i> <i>2026;28(5):26m04258</i>.</p><p><p>\n <i>Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.</i>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":22814,"journal":{"name":"The primary care companion for CNS disorders","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The primary care companion for CNS disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.26m04258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize patient perspectives on long-acting injectable (LAI) medications among adult psychiatric inpatients.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational pilot study of adult inpatients on a voluntary psychiatric unit at an urban safety-net hospital in Washington, DC. Patients were approached during hospitalization and completed a brief, structured worksheet assessing prior LAI exposure, perceived experience, and current treatment preferences. Data were collected from February 2025 to April 2025 and analyzed descriptively.

Results: A total of 30 patients participated (mean age of 46.8 years, 63% men, 87% Black). Most participants reported no prior LAI exposure (n=22, 73%). Among those with reported prior exposure (n=7, 23%), experiences were mixed: 2 reported that it was mostly helpful (29%), 2 reported that it was neutral (29%), and 2 reported that it was not helpful (29%). One person had not yet formed an opinion. Regarding current treatment preferences, a third stated that they preferred oral medications (n=10, 33%). Most reported that they would consider an LAI (n=10, 33%) or that they were unsure and wanted to discuss it further with their treatment team (n=8, 27%).

Conclusions: In this pilot sample, patient perspectives on LAI medications during psychiatric hospitalization were heterogeneous and characterized by substantial openness and uncertainty rather than fixed resistance. These findings suggest that inpatient settings may represent an opportunity for patient-centered discussion and shared decision-making regarding LAI treatment.

Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2026;28(5):26m04258.

Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

精神科住院期间患者对长效注射药物的看法
目的:了解成人精神科住院患者对长效注射药物的看法。方法:我们对华盛顿特区一家城市安全网医院的自愿精神科的成年住院患者进行了一项前瞻性观察性试点研究。在住院期间与患者接触,并完成简短的结构化工作表,评估先前的LAI暴露,感知经验和当前的治疗偏好。数据收集于2025年2月至2025年4月,并进行描述性分析。结果:共有30例患者参与,平均年龄46.8岁,男性63%,黑人87%。大多数参与者报告没有先前的LAI暴露(n= 22,73%)。在报告有先前接触的人中(n=7, 23%),经历是混合的:2人报告说它很有帮助(29%),2人报告说它是中性的(29%),2人报告说它没有帮助(29%)。有一个人还没有形成意见。关于目前的治疗偏好,三分之一的人表示他们更喜欢口服药物(n= 10,33 %)。大多数人报告说他们会考虑LAI (n= 10,33%),或者他们不确定并希望与治疗团队进一步讨论(n= 8,27%)。结论:在这个试点样本中,患者对精神科住院期间LAI药物的看法是异质的,具有很大的开放性和不确定性,而不是固定的抗性。这些发现表明,住院环境可能代表了以患者为中心的讨论和关于LAI治疗的共同决策的机会。Prim Care Companion CNS disorders; 2009;28(5):26m04258。本文末尾列出了作者所属单位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: Founded in 1998, The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders (ISSN 2155-7780), formerly The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, is an international, peer-reviewed, online-only journal, and its articles are indexed by the National Library of Medicine. PCC seeks to advance the clinical expertise of primary care physicians and other health care professionals who treat patients with mental and neurologic illnesses. PCC publishes research from disciplines such as medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and psychology, especially as it pertains to integrated delivery systems and interdisciplinary collaboration. PCC focuses on providing information of direct clinical utility and giving a voice to clinician researchers. Practice-based research from individuals and groups with clinical expertise is particularly welcome. Pertinent manuscript types include: -Original research -Systematic reviews -Meta-analyses -Case reports and series -Commenting letters to the editor Articles published in PCC typically cover attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, addiction, sleep disorders, pain, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书