Measuring illicit cigarette purchases in Bolivia: evidence from an intercept survey.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Joaquín Morales, Javier Ignacio Finot, Sofia Arteaga, Mauricio Chumacero, Mateo Vargas, Luca Pruzzo, Guillermo Paraje
{"title":"Measuring illicit cigarette purchases in Bolivia: evidence from an intercept survey.","authors":"Joaquín Morales, Javier Ignacio Finot, Sofia Arteaga, Mauricio Chumacero, Mateo Vargas, Luca Pruzzo, Guillermo Paraje","doi":"10.1136/tc-2026-060345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bolivia has one of the lowest tobacco tax rates in the Americas and shares a long border with Paraguay, a documented regional source of illicit cigarettes. The most recent estimate of illicit trade in Bolivia dates to 2002 and relied on industry-reported sales data. We provide the first independent, direct estimate of illicit cigarette penetration in the country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 2366 adults who smoke in Bolivia's three largest metropolitan areas (La Paz/El Alto, Cochabamba and Santa Cruz) between July and August 2024. Cigarette packs were photographed and classified as illicit based on the absence of a Bolivian tax registration number, non-compliant health warnings or missing customs stamps for imported brands. Loose-cigarette purchases were classified using brand authorisation status and price-outlier rules. A probit model examined correlates of illicit purchase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An estimated 38.1% of cigarette consumption in these cities is illicit, dominated by a single industrial-scale Paraguayan brand accounting for 85% of illicit sales. Penetration varies sharply by metropolitan area: 54.4% in Santa Cruz, 10.4% in La Paz/El Alto and 14.6% in Cochabamba. Because tax and tobacco-control policies are set nationally, these disparities cannot be explained by tax differentials and are more consistent with proximity to the Paraguayan border and local enforcement gaps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The industry argument that higher tobacco taxes would drive illicit trade in Bolivia is not supported. Policy efforts should focus on the industrial-scale supply of illicit cigarettes through non-price policies related to enforcement (track and trace, licensing, etc) and regional enforcement cooperation, rather than on delaying domestic tax reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2026-060345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bolivia has one of the lowest tobacco tax rates in the Americas and shares a long border with Paraguay, a documented regional source of illicit cigarettes. The most recent estimate of illicit trade in Bolivia dates to 2002 and relied on industry-reported sales data. We provide the first independent, direct estimate of illicit cigarette penetration in the country.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 2366 adults who smoke in Bolivia's three largest metropolitan areas (La Paz/El Alto, Cochabamba and Santa Cruz) between July and August 2024. Cigarette packs were photographed and classified as illicit based on the absence of a Bolivian tax registration number, non-compliant health warnings or missing customs stamps for imported brands. Loose-cigarette purchases were classified using brand authorisation status and price-outlier rules. A probit model examined correlates of illicit purchase.

Results: An estimated 38.1% of cigarette consumption in these cities is illicit, dominated by a single industrial-scale Paraguayan brand accounting for 85% of illicit sales. Penetration varies sharply by metropolitan area: 54.4% in Santa Cruz, 10.4% in La Paz/El Alto and 14.6% in Cochabamba. Because tax and tobacco-control policies are set nationally, these disparities cannot be explained by tax differentials and are more consistent with proximity to the Paraguayan border and local enforcement gaps.

Conclusions: The industry argument that higher tobacco taxes would drive illicit trade in Bolivia is not supported. Policy efforts should focus on the industrial-scale supply of illicit cigarettes through non-price policies related to enforcement (track and trace, licensing, etc) and regional enforcement cooperation, rather than on delaying domestic tax reform.

测量玻利维亚的非法香烟购买:来自拦截调查的证据。
背景:玻利维亚是美洲烟草税率最低的国家之一,与有记录的非法卷烟区域来源巴拉圭有很长的边界。对玻利维亚非法贸易的最新估计始于2002年,依据的是行业报告的销售数据。我们首次提供了对该国非法卷烟渗透率的独立、直接估计。方法:我们在2024年7月至8月期间对玻利维亚三个最大的大都市区(拉巴斯/埃尔阿尔托、科恰班巴和圣克鲁斯)的2366名成年人进行了横断面调查。对烟盒进行了拍照,并根据没有玻利维亚税务登记号码、不符合规定的健康警语或没有进口品牌的海关印章,将其归类为非法。使用品牌授权状态和价格异常值规则对散装香烟的购买进行分类。probit模型检验了非法购买的相关关系。结果:在这些城市中,估计38.1%的卷烟消费是非法的,由单一的巴拉圭工业规模品牌主导,占非法销售额的85%。各大城市的渗透率差异很大:圣克鲁斯为54.4%,拉巴斯/埃尔阿尔托为10.4%,科恰班巴为14.6%。由于税收和烟草控制政策是国家制定的,这些差异不能用税收差异来解释,而是与靠近巴拉圭边境和地方执法差距更为一致。结论:烟草业认为更高的烟草税将推动玻利维亚的非法贸易,这一论点不受支持。政策努力应侧重于通过与执法有关的非价格政策(追踪、许可等)和区域执法合作,以工业规模的非法卷烟供应,而不是拖延国内税收改革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书