Joaquín Morales, Javier Ignacio Finot, Sofia Arteaga, Mauricio Chumacero, Mateo Vargas, Luca Pruzzo, Guillermo Paraje
{"title":"Measuring illicit cigarette purchases in Bolivia: evidence from an intercept survey.","authors":"Joaquín Morales, Javier Ignacio Finot, Sofia Arteaga, Mauricio Chumacero, Mateo Vargas, Luca Pruzzo, Guillermo Paraje","doi":"10.1136/tc-2026-060345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bolivia has one of the lowest tobacco tax rates in the Americas and shares a long border with Paraguay, a documented regional source of illicit cigarettes. The most recent estimate of illicit trade in Bolivia dates to 2002 and relied on industry-reported sales data. We provide the first independent, direct estimate of illicit cigarette penetration in the country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 2366 adults who smoke in Bolivia's three largest metropolitan areas (La Paz/El Alto, Cochabamba and Santa Cruz) between July and August 2024. Cigarette packs were photographed and classified as illicit based on the absence of a Bolivian tax registration number, non-compliant health warnings or missing customs stamps for imported brands. Loose-cigarette purchases were classified using brand authorisation status and price-outlier rules. A probit model examined correlates of illicit purchase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An estimated 38.1% of cigarette consumption in these cities is illicit, dominated by a single industrial-scale Paraguayan brand accounting for 85% of illicit sales. Penetration varies sharply by metropolitan area: 54.4% in Santa Cruz, 10.4% in La Paz/El Alto and 14.6% in Cochabamba. Because tax and tobacco-control policies are set nationally, these disparities cannot be explained by tax differentials and are more consistent with proximity to the Paraguayan border and local enforcement gaps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The industry argument that higher tobacco taxes would drive illicit trade in Bolivia is not supported. Policy efforts should focus on the industrial-scale supply of illicit cigarettes through non-price policies related to enforcement (track and trace, licensing, etc) and regional enforcement cooperation, rather than on delaying domestic tax reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2026-060345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bolivia has one of the lowest tobacco tax rates in the Americas and shares a long border with Paraguay, a documented regional source of illicit cigarettes. The most recent estimate of illicit trade in Bolivia dates to 2002 and relied on industry-reported sales data. We provide the first independent, direct estimate of illicit cigarette penetration in the country.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 2366 adults who smoke in Bolivia's three largest metropolitan areas (La Paz/El Alto, Cochabamba and Santa Cruz) between July and August 2024. Cigarette packs were photographed and classified as illicit based on the absence of a Bolivian tax registration number, non-compliant health warnings or missing customs stamps for imported brands. Loose-cigarette purchases were classified using brand authorisation status and price-outlier rules. A probit model examined correlates of illicit purchase.
Results: An estimated 38.1% of cigarette consumption in these cities is illicit, dominated by a single industrial-scale Paraguayan brand accounting for 85% of illicit sales. Penetration varies sharply by metropolitan area: 54.4% in Santa Cruz, 10.4% in La Paz/El Alto and 14.6% in Cochabamba. Because tax and tobacco-control policies are set nationally, these disparities cannot be explained by tax differentials and are more consistent with proximity to the Paraguayan border and local enforcement gaps.
Conclusions: The industry argument that higher tobacco taxes would drive illicit trade in Bolivia is not supported. Policy efforts should focus on the industrial-scale supply of illicit cigarettes through non-price policies related to enforcement (track and trace, licensing, etc) and regional enforcement cooperation, rather than on delaying domestic tax reform.
期刊介绍:
Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.