Employee motivators and barriers of workplace-supported blood donation.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2026-09-30 DOI:10.1111/trf.70419
Kathleen Chell, Lachie Toms, Barbara Masser, Debbie Haski-Leventhal, Irit Alony
{"title":"Employee motivators and barriers of workplace-supported blood donation.","authors":"Kathleen Chell, Lachie Toms, Barbara Masser, Debbie Haski-Leventhal, Irit Alony","doi":"10.1111/trf.70419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Workplace-supported blood donation is a promising yet underexamined strategy for donor recruitment and retention. Aligning blood donation with corporate social responsibility goals may improve employee engagement while reducing logistical barriers. Although blood collection agencies worldwide adopt varied models of workplace support, limited research has examined how workplace contexts shape motivators and barriers to blood donation.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>An online self-report survey (n = 285) was conducted with employees from four large Australian organizations, each with established blood donation teams (>1000 members) and paid donor leave. Measures included awareness and engagement of workplace donation teams and leave entitlements, as well as general and workplace-specific motivators and barriers, with subgroup comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altruism and perceived need motivated blood donation, while inconvenience (time, location) was the main barrier, especially among non-donors. Workplace-supported blood donation increased motivation through convenience, social connection, and supportive organizational culture. However, lack of awareness of workplace initiatives was the most common barrier, indicating substantial unrealized potential.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>When effectively embedded and communicated, workplace-supported blood donation could activate latent altruism, reduce barriers, and foster social norms that sustain behavior, as well as strengthen coworker connection and alignment with organizational values. Further research should examine the benefits for employees and employers to build the case for workplaces as effective settings for donor recruitment and retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.70419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Workplace-supported blood donation is a promising yet underexamined strategy for donor recruitment and retention. Aligning blood donation with corporate social responsibility goals may improve employee engagement while reducing logistical barriers. Although blood collection agencies worldwide adopt varied models of workplace support, limited research has examined how workplace contexts shape motivators and barriers to blood donation.

Study design and methods: An online self-report survey (n = 285) was conducted with employees from four large Australian organizations, each with established blood donation teams (>1000 members) and paid donor leave. Measures included awareness and engagement of workplace donation teams and leave entitlements, as well as general and workplace-specific motivators and barriers, with subgroup comparisons.

Results: Altruism and perceived need motivated blood donation, while inconvenience (time, location) was the main barrier, especially among non-donors. Workplace-supported blood donation increased motivation through convenience, social connection, and supportive organizational culture. However, lack of awareness of workplace initiatives was the most common barrier, indicating substantial unrealized potential.

Discussion: When effectively embedded and communicated, workplace-supported blood donation could activate latent altruism, reduce barriers, and foster social norms that sustain behavior, as well as strengthen coworker connection and alignment with organizational values. Further research should examine the benefits for employees and employers to build the case for workplaces as effective settings for donor recruitment and retention.

员工激励因素和工作场所支持献血的障碍。
背景:工作场所支持的献血是一种很有前途但尚未得到充分研究的献血者招募和保留策略。将献血与企业社会责任目标结合起来,可以提高员工敬业度,同时减少物流障碍。尽管世界各地的采血机构采用了不同的工作场所支持模式,但有限的研究调查了工作场所环境如何形成献血的激励因素和障碍。研究设计和方法:对澳大利亚四家大型组织的员工进行了一项在线自我报告调查(n = 285),每家组织都有建立的献血团队(1000名成员)和带薪献血假。措施包括对工作场所捐赠团队和休假权利的认识和参与,以及一般和工作场所特定的激励因素和障碍,并进行分组比较。结果:利他主义和感知需求是献血的主要动机,而不便(时间、地点)是主要障碍,特别是在非献血者中。工作场所支持的献血通过便利、社会联系和支持性的组织文化增加了动机。然而,缺乏对工作场所倡议的认识是最常见的障碍,表明有大量潜力尚未实现。讨论:当有效地嵌入和沟通时,工作场所支持的献血可以激活潜在的利他主义,减少障碍,培养维持行为的社会规范,并加强同事之间的联系和与组织价值观的一致。进一步的研究应审查对雇员和雇主的好处,以证明工作场所是招募和保留捐助者的有效场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书