Javier Sanmartin, Joan Cartanya-Bonvehi, Helen Valenzuela, Lidia Carballeira, Silvia Montserrat, Adrian Baranchuk, Roberto Elosua
{"title":"Frequency and Prognostic Significance of T-wave Inversions in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Javier Sanmartin, Joan Cartanya-Bonvehi, Helen Valenzuela, Lidia Carballeira, Silvia Montserrat, Adrian Baranchuk, Roberto Elosua","doi":"10.1186/s40798-026-01115-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>T-wave inversions (TWI) are a challenging finding in athletes' electrocardiograms. This study aimed to determine the frequency and prognosis of TWI in athletes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023494038). Data sources were PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included original research articles reporting on the prevalence or underlying substrates of TWI and providing data on athletes participating in any type of sports, sex, or race. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Random-effects models were used. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses (sex, age, ethnicity, diagnostic criteria) were predefined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,509 articles identified, 115 were selected (258,954 individuals). Substantial heterogeneity was observed among the study results. The global TWI prevalence in athletes > 16 years according to the International criteria was 4% (3%, 1%, and 0% in anterior, inferior, and lateral leads, respectively). Prevalence was higher in Black athletes. TWI was more frequent in athletes than non-athletes (prevalence ratio=1.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.97). Cardiomyopathy diagnosis among athletes with TWI showed high variability, but in most studies, prevalence was <1%. Acute cardiovascular event incidence was low in most of the studies with high heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TWI is more frequent in athletes than non-athletes but remains low overall. While it may reflect physiological exercise related ventricular remodelling, thorough evaluation is essential to exclude structural heart disease. The risk of cardiovascular events is uncertain due to low statistical power and high heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13633200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-026-01115-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: T-wave inversions (TWI) are a challenging finding in athletes' electrocardiograms. This study aimed to determine the frequency and prognosis of TWI in athletes.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023494038). Data sources were PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included original research articles reporting on the prevalence or underlying substrates of TWI and providing data on athletes participating in any type of sports, sex, or race. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. Random-effects models were used. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses (sex, age, ethnicity, diagnostic criteria) were predefined.
Results: Of 4,509 articles identified, 115 were selected (258,954 individuals). Substantial heterogeneity was observed among the study results. The global TWI prevalence in athletes > 16 years according to the International criteria was 4% (3%, 1%, and 0% in anterior, inferior, and lateral leads, respectively). Prevalence was higher in Black athletes. TWI was more frequent in athletes than non-athletes (prevalence ratio=1.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.97). Cardiomyopathy diagnosis among athletes with TWI showed high variability, but in most studies, prevalence was <1%. Acute cardiovascular event incidence was low in most of the studies with high heterogeneity.
Conclusions: TWI is more frequent in athletes than non-athletes but remains low overall. While it may reflect physiological exercise related ventricular remodelling, thorough evaluation is essential to exclude structural heart disease. The risk of cardiovascular events is uncertain due to low statistical power and high heterogeneity.
背景:t波反转(TWI)在运动员心电图中是一个具有挑战性的发现。本研究旨在确定运动员发生TWI的频率和预后。方法:遵循PRISMA指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023494038)。数据来源为PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science。我们纳入了报道TWI患病率或潜在基础的原创研究文章,并提供了参加任何类型运动、性别或种族的运动员的数据。使用横截面研究的乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型。预先确定敏感性和亚组分析(性别、年龄、种族、诊断标准)。结果:在鉴定的4,509篇文章中,选择了115篇(258,954人)。研究结果存在显著的异质性。根据国际标准,2016年全球运动员TWI患病率为4%(前导联、下导联和外侧导联分别为3%、1%和0%)。黑人运动员的患病率更高。TWI在运动员中的发生率高于非运动员(患病率比=1.49;95%可信区间:1.13-1.97)。TWI运动员的心肌病诊断表现出很高的可变性,但在大多数研究中,患病率为:结论:TWI在运动员中比非运动员更常见,但总体上仍较低。虽然它可能反映与生理运动相关的心室重构,但彻底的评估对于排除结构性心脏病是必要的。由于统计效力低和异质性高,心血管事件的风险是不确定的。