Feasibility of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in extremely- and very-low-birth-weight infants: a single-center retrospective study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Hiroshi Nouso, Reisuke Imaji, Hinako Watanabe, Momoko Sumida, Hiroshi Okano, Terutaka Tanimoto
{"title":"Feasibility of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in extremely- and very-low-birth-weight infants: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Hiroshi Nouso, Reisuke Imaji, Hinako Watanabe, Momoko Sumida, Hiroshi Okano, Terutaka Tanimoto","doi":"10.1007/s00595-026-03497-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Inguinal hernia (IH) occurs frequently in extremely- and very-low-birth-weight (ELBW/VLBW) infants. This study evaluates the feasibility of performing laparoscopic repair (LR) near neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge, by comparing its perioperative outcomes with those of open repair (OR) in ELBW/VLBW infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed infants with birth weight < 1500 g who were diagnosed with IH during NICU hospitalization and underwent IH repair between 2015 and 2023. LR was performed using the laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) technique. We compared the patient characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among a total of 49 infants, 31 underwent OR and 18 underwent LR. The LR group had a higher body weight at surgery, a lower prevalence of chronic lung disease, and different sex distribution. Operative and anesthesia times were similar for unilateral repair but shorter with LR for bilateral repair. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications. Three infants from the OR group underwent subsequent umbilicoplasty, and one developed a metachronous contralateral hernia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LR appears technically feasible with acceptable short-term outcomes and may allow contralateral evaluation and concomitant umbilicoplasty. However, baseline imbalances, the small sample size, and limited follow-up preclude conclusions regarding superiority or equivalence to OR.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-026-03497-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Inguinal hernia (IH) occurs frequently in extremely- and very-low-birth-weight (ELBW/VLBW) infants. This study evaluates the feasibility of performing laparoscopic repair (LR) near neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge, by comparing its perioperative outcomes with those of open repair (OR) in ELBW/VLBW infants.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed infants with birth weight < 1500 g who were diagnosed with IH during NICU hospitalization and underwent IH repair between 2015 and 2023. LR was performed using the laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) technique. We compared the patient characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative outcomes between the groups.

Results: Among a total of 49 infants, 31 underwent OR and 18 underwent LR. The LR group had a higher body weight at surgery, a lower prevalence of chronic lung disease, and different sex distribution. Operative and anesthesia times were similar for unilateral repair but shorter with LR for bilateral repair. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications. Three infants from the OR group underwent subsequent umbilicoplasty, and one developed a metachronous contralateral hernia.

Conclusion: LR appears technically feasible with acceptable short-term outcomes and may allow contralateral evaluation and concomitant umbilicoplasty. However, baseline imbalances, the small sample size, and limited follow-up preclude conclusions regarding superiority or equivalence to OR.

极低和极低出生体重儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补的可行性:一项单中心回顾性研究。
目的:腹股沟疝(IH)常见于极低和极低出生体重(ELBW/VLBW)婴儿。本研究通过比较ELBW/VLBW婴儿的围手术期结果,评估在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)出院时进行腹腔镜修复(LR)的可行性。方法:我们回顾性地回顾了出生体重的婴儿。结果:在49例婴儿中,31例接受了OR, 18例接受了LR。LR组手术时体重较高,慢性肺病患病率较低,性别分布不同。单侧修复术的手术时间和麻醉时间相似,但双侧修复术的LR较短。两组术后并发症无明显差异。三名来自OR组的婴儿接受了随后的脐带成形术,其中一名发生了异时性对侧疝。结论:LR在技术上可行,短期效果可接受,可允许对侧评估和伴随的脐带成形术。然而,基线不平衡、小样本量和有限的随访排除了关于or优越性或等效性的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书