The effect of long-term e-cigarette use on the inflammation marker fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Induced Diseases Pub Date : 2026-09-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tid/224361
Mohammed A Almeshari, Afaf M Alrashdi, Alhanouf G Almutairi, Lujain A Alfaiz, Rimas M Almalki, Salma A Kaabi
{"title":"The effect of long-term e-cigarette use on the inflammation marker fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO): A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohammed A Almeshari, Afaf M Alrashdi, Alhanouf G Almutairi, Lujain A Alfaiz, Rimas M Almalki, Salma A Kaabi","doi":"10.18332/tid/224361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>E-cigarettes are perceived as a less harmful alternative to conventional cigarettes; however, concerns remain about the potential health risks associated with long-term use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the long-term effects of e-cigarettes on airway inflammation, as measured by fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched via Ovid, with the last search conducted on 3 October 2025. Studies were included if they used FeNO to assess the effects of long-term e-cigarette use; those without FeNO measurements were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with validated tools according to study design, and meta-analysis was performed when quantitative data were available. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024508780).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 1018 records, six studies (n=792 participants) met the eligibility criteria. The included studies varied in population characteristics and findings: one reported higher FeNO in complete quitters versus failures/reducers; two found higher FeNO in e-cigarette users versus controls; two observed no difference; and one found lower FeNO among e-cigarette users. The meta-analysis of three studies showed a pooled mean difference of -0.26 (95% CI: -9.74-9.22), indicating no significant difference between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results across studies were heterogeneous and inconclusive, highlighting the variability in findings related to the impact of long-term e-cigarette use on airway inflammation. These inconsistencies underscore the need for further research, particularly well-powered longitudinal prospective studies, to better understand the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on inflammatory biomarkers such as FeNO.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"24 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13629185/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/224361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: E-cigarettes are perceived as a less harmful alternative to conventional cigarettes; however, concerns remain about the potential health risks associated with long-term use. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the long-term effects of e-cigarettes on airway inflammation, as measured by fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO).

Methods: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched via Ovid, with the last search conducted on 3 October 2025. Studies were included if they used FeNO to assess the effects of long-term e-cigarette use; those without FeNO measurements were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed with validated tools according to study design, and meta-analysis was performed when quantitative data were available. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024508780).

Results: From 1018 records, six studies (n=792 participants) met the eligibility criteria. The included studies varied in population characteristics and findings: one reported higher FeNO in complete quitters versus failures/reducers; two found higher FeNO in e-cigarette users versus controls; two observed no difference; and one found lower FeNO among e-cigarette users. The meta-analysis of three studies showed a pooled mean difference of -0.26 (95% CI: -9.74-9.22), indicating no significant difference between groups.

Conclusions: The results across studies were heterogeneous and inconclusive, highlighting the variability in findings related to the impact of long-term e-cigarette use on airway inflammation. These inconsistencies underscore the need for further research, particularly well-powered longitudinal prospective studies, to better understand the long-term effects of e-cigarette use on inflammatory biomarkers such as FeNO.

长期使用电子烟对炎症标志物呼气一氧化氮分数(FeNO)的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
电子烟被认为是一种危害较小的传统香烟替代品;然而,长期使用的潜在健康风险仍然令人担忧。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估电子烟对气道炎症的长期影响,通过呼气一氧化氮分数(FeNO)来测量。方法:系统综述和荟萃分析。通过Ovid检索MEDLINE和EMBASE,最后一次检索于2025年10月3日进行。如果研究使用FeNO来评估长期使用电子烟的影响,则纳入研究;没有FeNO测量的被排除在外。根据研究设计,使用经过验证的工具评估偏倚风险,并在获得定量数据时进行荟萃分析。该方案在PROSPERO (CRD42024508780)中前瞻性注册。结果:从1018条记录中,有6项研究(n=792名参与者)符合入选标准。纳入的研究在人群特征和结果上各不相同:一项研究报告完全戒烟者的FeNO高于失败/减少者;两项研究发现,电子烟使用者的FeNO高于对照组;两个观察到无差异;一项研究发现电子烟使用者的FeNO较低。三项研究的meta分析显示,合并平均差异为-0.26 (95% CI: -9.74-9.22),组间无显著差异。结论:所有研究的结果都是异质的和不确定的,突出了长期使用电子烟对气道炎症影响的研究结果的可变性。这些不一致强调了进一步研究的必要性,特别是有力的纵向前瞻性研究,以更好地了解电子烟使用对炎性生物标志物(如FeNO)的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Induced Diseases
Tobacco Induced Diseases SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Induced Diseases encompasses all aspects of research related to the prevention and control of tobacco use at a global level. Preventing diseases attributable to tobacco is only one aspect of the journal, whose overall scope is to provide a forum for the publication of research articles that can contribute to reducing the burden of tobacco induced diseases globally. To address this epidemic we believe that there must be an avenue for the publication of research/policy activities on tobacco control initiatives that may be very important at a regional and national level. This approach provides a very important "hands on" service to the tobacco control community at a global scale - as common problems have common solutions. Hence, we see ourselves as "connectors" within this global community. The journal hence encourages the submission of articles from all medical, biological and psychosocial disciplines, ranging from medical and dental clinicians, through health professionals to basic biomedical and clinical scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书