Clinical factors associated with rescue bronchoscopic sputum suction after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yasuo Tsuda, Tomonori Nakanoko, Tetsuro Kawazoe, Kojiro Shirabe, Keita Natsugoe, Yuki Shin, Koji Ando, Eiji Oki, Tomoharu Yoshizumi
{"title":"Clinical factors associated with rescue bronchoscopic sputum suction after minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Yasuo Tsuda, Tomonori Nakanoko, Tetsuro Kawazoe, Kojiro Shirabe, Keita Natsugoe, Yuki Shin, Koji Ando, Eiji Oki, Tomoharu Yoshizumi","doi":"10.1007/s00595-026-03500-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Postoperative sputum retention after minimally invasive esophagectomy may require bronchoscopic sputum suction when conservative airway clearance is insufficient. However, the clinical features associated with this intervention remain unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the data of 145 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. Patients were divided into those who required postoperative bronchoscopic sputum suction and those who did not. Clinicopathological factors, surgical outcomes, Brinkman Index, pulmonary function, and postoperative complications were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative bronchoscopic sputum suction was required in 21 patients. All bronchoscopic procedures were performed after transfer from the intensive care unit to the general ward. The bronchoscopic group had a significantly higher Brinkman Index than the no-bronchoscopic group, whereas standard spirometric parameters, including forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and the forced expiratory volume in 1 s percentage, did not differ between the groups. Patients requiring bronchoscopy had higher rates of postoperative pneumonia and anastomotic leakage and a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy, greater cumulative smoking exposure was associated with rescue bronchoscopic sputum suction despite comparable preoperative spirometry. Therefore, a high Brinkman index may indicate the need for closer postoperative respiratory surveillance and timely airway clearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-026-03500-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Postoperative sputum retention after minimally invasive esophagectomy may require bronchoscopic sputum suction when conservative airway clearance is insufficient. However, the clinical features associated with this intervention remain unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 145 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. Patients were divided into those who required postoperative bronchoscopic sputum suction and those who did not. Clinicopathological factors, surgical outcomes, Brinkman Index, pulmonary function, and postoperative complications were compared.

Results: Postoperative bronchoscopic sputum suction was required in 21 patients. All bronchoscopic procedures were performed after transfer from the intensive care unit to the general ward. The bronchoscopic group had a significantly higher Brinkman Index than the no-bronchoscopic group, whereas standard spirometric parameters, including forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and the forced expiratory volume in 1 s percentage, did not differ between the groups. Patients requiring bronchoscopy had higher rates of postoperative pneumonia and anastomotic leakage and a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy, greater cumulative smoking exposure was associated with rescue bronchoscopic sputum suction despite comparable preoperative spirometry. Therefore, a high Brinkman index may indicate the need for closer postoperative respiratory surveillance and timely airway clearance.

微创食管切除术后支气管镜吸痰抢救相关临床因素:一项单中心回顾性研究。
目的:微创食管切除术后痰潴留可能需要支气管镜吸痰,当保守气道间隙不足时。然而,与这种干预相关的临床特征仍不清楚。方法:回顾性分析145例行微创食管切除术治疗胸段食管癌的临床资料。患者分为术后需要支气管镜吸痰组和不需要吸痰组。比较临床病理因素、手术结果、Brinkman指数、肺功能和术后并发症。结果:21例患者术后行支气管镜吸痰。所有的支气管镜检查都是在从重症监护室转到普通病房后进行的。支气管镜组的Brinkman指数明显高于非支气管镜组,而标准肺活量指标,包括用力肺活量、1s用力呼气量和1s用力呼气量的百分比,在两组之间没有差异。需要支气管镜检查的患者术后肺炎和吻合口漏的发生率较高,术后住院时间明显延长。结论:在微创食管切除术的患者中,尽管术前肺量测量相当,但更大的累积吸烟暴露与抢救支气管镜吸痰有关。因此,高Brinkman指数可能表明术后需要更密切的呼吸监测和及时的气道清除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书