Convolutional neural network for red blood cell transfusion prediction: A machine learning based study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Liyun Zheng, Jiyuan Ma, Mengyun Deng, Yiming Ma, Yuan Zhang, Lihua Wang, Xiaofei Li
{"title":"Convolutional neural network for red blood cell transfusion prediction: A machine learning based study.","authors":"Liyun Zheng, Jiyuan Ma, Mengyun Deng, Yiming Ma, Yuan Zhang, Lihua Wang, Xiaofei Li","doi":"10.1111/tme.70126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subjective, inconsistent clinician judgement on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion demand causes unnecessary blood wastage, increased perioperative safety risks, and poorly balanced hospital blood inventory. To tackle these persistent clinical limitations, we developed a workflow-adapted clinical decision support tool: a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN) trained on routinely acquired haematological and clinical variables to stratify inpatient RBC transfusion volume categories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a retrospective cohort of 7,250 patients from Beijing Friendship Hospital (April 2024-June 2025), we trained a 1D CNN on 19 standardised pre-transfusion variables to predict transfusion volume categories (1, 2, 3, 4, ≥5 units). The model was optimised with Adam and evaluated on a 30% hold-out test set. Comprehensive characterisation of the cohort's baseline clinical features was also performed to clearly define the transfusion contexts and clinical indications of the study population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the 30% hold-out test set, the 1D CNN reached an overall accuracy of 0.7314 and converged without overfitting. The model accurately identified the predominant 2 units transfusion class (68.03% of cases, precision 0.7314). However, performance was limited in minority classes (≥5 units and 3 units), which showed low prevalence (< 5%) and overlapping haemoglobin values (60-80 g/L), indicating a critical safety limitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 1D CNN reliably forecasts routine transfusion requirements in a single-center setting but under-detects high-volume transfusion events. External validation across diverse clinical centers, targeted data enrichment for minority classes, and development of indication-specific sub-models are mandatory to improve the model's generalizability and clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.70126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subjective, inconsistent clinician judgement on red blood cell (RBC) transfusion demand causes unnecessary blood wastage, increased perioperative safety risks, and poorly balanced hospital blood inventory. To tackle these persistent clinical limitations, we developed a workflow-adapted clinical decision support tool: a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN) trained on routinely acquired haematological and clinical variables to stratify inpatient RBC transfusion volume categories.

Methods: Using a retrospective cohort of 7,250 patients from Beijing Friendship Hospital (April 2024-June 2025), we trained a 1D CNN on 19 standardised pre-transfusion variables to predict transfusion volume categories (1, 2, 3, 4, ≥5 units). The model was optimised with Adam and evaluated on a 30% hold-out test set. Comprehensive characterisation of the cohort's baseline clinical features was also performed to clearly define the transfusion contexts and clinical indications of the study population.

Results: On the 30% hold-out test set, the 1D CNN reached an overall accuracy of 0.7314 and converged without overfitting. The model accurately identified the predominant 2 units transfusion class (68.03% of cases, precision 0.7314). However, performance was limited in minority classes (≥5 units and 3 units), which showed low prevalence (< 5%) and overlapping haemoglobin values (60-80 g/L), indicating a critical safety limitation.

Conclusions: The 1D CNN reliably forecasts routine transfusion requirements in a single-center setting but under-detects high-volume transfusion events. External validation across diverse clinical centers, targeted data enrichment for minority classes, and development of indication-specific sub-models are mandatory to improve the model's generalizability and clinical utility.

卷积神经网络用于红细胞输血预测:一种基于机器学习的研究。
背景:临床医生对红细胞(RBC)输血需求的主观判断不一致,导致不必要的血液浪费,增加围手术期安全风险,导致医院血液库存不平衡。为了解决这些持续的临床局限性,我们开发了一种适应工作流程的临床决策支持工具:一维卷积神经网络(1D CNN),训练常规获得的血液学和临床变量,以分层住院患者红细胞输血量类别。方法:采用北京友谊医院(2024年4月- 2025年6月)7250例患者的回顾性队列,对19个标准化输血前变量进行1D CNN训练,预测输血量类别(1、2、3、4、≥5单位)。亚当对模型进行了优化,并在30%的测试集上进行了评估。还对队列的基线临床特征进行了全面的描述,以明确定义研究人群的输血背景和临床适应症。结果:在30% hold out的测试集上,1D CNN的整体准确率达到0.7314,没有过拟合。该模型准确地识别出优势2单位输血类别(68.03%,准确率0.7314)。然而,在少数类别(≥5个单位和3个单位)中,其表现有限,患病率较低(结论:1D CNN可靠地预测了单中心环境下的常规输血需求,但对大容量输血事件的检测不足)。跨不同临床中心的外部验证、针对少数群体的有针对性的数据丰富以及针对特定适应症的子模型的开发是提高模型的通用性和临床实用性的必要条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion Medicine
Transfusion Medicine 医学-血液学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology. In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书