Struggling for resonance: Mediopassive interaction in a long-term treatment of severe personality disorder.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychotherapy Pub Date : 2026-10-05 DOI:10.1037/pst0000633
Christian Sell, Stefan Pfänder
{"title":"Struggling for resonance: Mediopassive interaction in a long-term treatment of severe personality disorder.","authors":"Christian Sell, Stefan Pfänder","doi":"10.1037/pst0000633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although clinicians often report significant emotional challenges in psychotherapy for personality disorders, we still know relatively little about how these difficulties are enacted and reorganized in moment-to-moment patient-therapist interaction. We examine whether interactional resonance and mediopassive agency can help illuminate relational difficulties and change in a good-outcome long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy involving a patient with severe interpersonal pathology, chronic depressive symptoms, and somatic complaints. The patient met the diagnostic criteria for borderline and avoidant personality disorders, as well as depressive and somatic symptom disorders. For much of the treatment, the therapist described sessions as highly distressing. Over time, sessions were experienced as less distressing and more productive. We examined whether this shift could be accounted for by changes in how patient and therapist took up and developed each other's contributions in interaction. Following a preliminary screening of therapist reports, case notes, and session recordings, we selected 10 sessions for multimodal conversation analysis. Using exploratory conversation analysis, we specified analytic indicators for interactional resonance and then compared five high-distress sessions with five lower distress sessions. High-distress sessions showed lower interactional resonance, whereas lower distress sessions showed higher resonance. In lower distress sessions, patient and therapist more often engaged in mediopassive interactions-that is, they jointly participated in the stepwise construction of meaning across turns. Psychotherapy for severe interpersonal pathology may involve working with persistently low levels of interactional resonance that constrain spontaneous, collaborative meaning-making. The findings further suggest that a dyad's capacity for interactional resonance may increase over the course of long-term treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20910,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000633","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although clinicians often report significant emotional challenges in psychotherapy for personality disorders, we still know relatively little about how these difficulties are enacted and reorganized in moment-to-moment patient-therapist interaction. We examine whether interactional resonance and mediopassive agency can help illuminate relational difficulties and change in a good-outcome long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy involving a patient with severe interpersonal pathology, chronic depressive symptoms, and somatic complaints. The patient met the diagnostic criteria for borderline and avoidant personality disorders, as well as depressive and somatic symptom disorders. For much of the treatment, the therapist described sessions as highly distressing. Over time, sessions were experienced as less distressing and more productive. We examined whether this shift could be accounted for by changes in how patient and therapist took up and developed each other's contributions in interaction. Following a preliminary screening of therapist reports, case notes, and session recordings, we selected 10 sessions for multimodal conversation analysis. Using exploratory conversation analysis, we specified analytic indicators for interactional resonance and then compared five high-distress sessions with five lower distress sessions. High-distress sessions showed lower interactional resonance, whereas lower distress sessions showed higher resonance. In lower distress sessions, patient and therapist more often engaged in mediopassive interactions-that is, they jointly participated in the stepwise construction of meaning across turns. Psychotherapy for severe interpersonal pathology may involve working with persistently low levels of interactional resonance that constrain spontaneous, collaborative meaning-making. The findings further suggest that a dyad's capacity for interactional resonance may increase over the course of long-term treatment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

为共鸣而挣扎:重度人格障碍长期治疗中的中被动互动。
尽管临床医生经常在人格障碍的心理治疗中报告重大的情感挑战,但我们对这些困难是如何在实时的患者-治疗师互动中制定和重组的仍然知之甚少。我们研究了互动共振和中被动代理是否可以帮助阐明关系困难和改变,在涉及严重人际病理、慢性抑郁症状和躯体疾病的患者的长期心理动力学心理治疗中,效果良好。患者符合边缘型和回避型人格障碍的诊断标准,以及抑郁和躯体症状障碍。在大部分的治疗中,治疗师将疗程描述为极度痛苦。随着时间的推移,疗程变得不那么痛苦,更有成效。我们研究了这种转变是否可以通过患者和治疗师在互动中如何接受和发展彼此的贡献来解释。在对治疗师报告、病例记录和会话记录进行初步筛选后,我们选择了10个会话进行多模式会话分析。采用探索性对话分析,我们指定了互动共振的分析指标,然后比较了5个高痛苦会话和5个低痛苦会话。高痛苦组表现出较低的互动共振,而低痛苦组表现出较高的互动共振。在较低的痛苦阶段,患者和治疗师更多地参与到中被动的互动中,也就是说,他们共同参与到跨回合的意义逐步构建中。严重人际关系病理学的心理治疗可能涉及持续低水平的互动共鸣,这限制了自发的、协作的意义创造。研究结果进一步表明,在长期治疗过程中,二人组的互动共振能力可能会增加。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training publishes a wide variety of articles relevant to the field of psychotherapy. The journal strives to foster interactions among individuals involved with training, practice theory, and research since all areas are essential to psychotherapy. This journal is an invaluable resource for practicing clinical and counseling psychologists, social workers, and mental health professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书